From 5a440f1bc29c06fdaa93ce8e05da70fc081f74ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: varkor Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 01:03:02 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Fix control flow check for breaking with diverging values --- compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/expr.rs | 5 ++++- src/test/ui/break-diverging-value.rs | 13 +++++++++++++ src/test/ui/break-diverging-value.stderr | 11 +++++++++++ 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 src/test/ui/break-diverging-value.rs create mode 100644 src/test/ui/break-diverging-value.stderr diff --git a/compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/expr.rs b/compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/expr.rs index 9990f86a36b..15820d367c0 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/expr.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/expr.rs @@ -627,7 +627,10 @@ fn check_expr_break( assert!(expr_opt.is_none() || self.tcx.sess.has_errors()); } - ctxt.may_break = true; + // If we encountered a `break`, then (no surprise) it may be possible to break from the + // loop... unless the value being returned from the loop diverges itself, e.g. + // `break return 5` or `break loop {}`. + ctxt.may_break |= !e_ty.is_never(); // the type of a `break` is always `!`, since it diverges tcx.types.never diff --git a/src/test/ui/break-diverging-value.rs b/src/test/ui/break-diverging-value.rs new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0498580c7bd --- /dev/null +++ b/src/test/ui/break-diverging-value.rs @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +fn loop_break_return() -> i32 { + let loop_value = loop { break return 0 }; // ok +} + +fn loop_break_loop() -> i32 { + let loop_value = loop { break loop {} }; // ok +} + +fn loop_break_break() -> i32 { //~ ERROR mismatched types + let loop_value = loop { break break }; +} + +fn main() {} diff --git a/src/test/ui/break-diverging-value.stderr b/src/test/ui/break-diverging-value.stderr new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..78a8d78ed34 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/test/ui/break-diverging-value.stderr @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +error[E0308]: mismatched types + --> $DIR/break-diverging-value.rs:9:26 + | +LL | fn loop_break_break() -> i32 { + | ---------------- ^^^ expected `i32`, found `()` + | | + | implicitly returns `()` as its body has no tail or `return` expression + +error: aborting due to previous error + +For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0308`. -- 2.44.0