4173: Use core instead of std for builtin derive macros r=edwin0cheng a=edwin0cheng
Fixed #4087.
We can't use `$crate` here right now because :
1. We have to able to detect `macro` 2.0 in collecting phase for finding `rustc_builtin_macro` attrs.
2. And we have to make hygiene works for builtin derive macro.
4159: For associated type shorthand (T::Item), use the substs from the where clause r=matklad a=flodiebold
So e.g. if we have `fn foo<T: SomeTrait<u32>>() -> T::Item`, we want to lower that to `<T as SomeTrait<u32>>::Item` and not `<T as SomeTrait<_>>::Item`.
For associated type shorthand (T::Item), use the substs from the where clause
So e.g. if we have `fn foo<T: SomeTrait<u32>>() -> T::Item`, we want to lower
that to `<T as SomeTrait<u32>>::Item` and not `<T as SomeTrait<_>>::Item`.
4113: Support returning non-hierarchical symbols r=matklad a=kjeremy
If `hierarchicalDocumentSymbolSupport` is not true in the client capabilites
then it does not support the `DocumentSymbol[]` return type from the
`textDocument/documentSymbol` request and we must fall back to `SymbolInformation[]`.
This is one of the few requests that use the client capabilities to
differentiate between return types and could cause problems for clients.
See https://github.com/microsoft/language-server-protocol/pull/538#issuecomment-442510767 for more context.
Found while looking at #144
4136: add support for cfg feature attributes on expression #4063 r=matklad a=bnjjj
close issue #4063
4141: Fix typo r=matklad a=Veetaha
4142: Remove unnecessary async from vscode language client creation r=matklad a=Veetaha
Co-authored-by: kjeremy <kjeremy@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Benjamin Coenen <5719034+bnjjj@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: veetaha <veetaha2@gmail.com>
4133: main: eagerly prime goto-definition caches r=matklad a=BurntSushi
This commit eagerly primes the caches used by goto-definition by
submitting a "phantom" goto-definition request. This is perhaps a bit
circuitous, but it does actually get the job done. The result of this
change is that once RA is finished its initial loading of a project,
goto-definition requests are instant. There don't appear to be any more
surprise latency spikes.
This _partially_ addresses #1650 in that it front-loads the latency of the
first goto-definition request, which in turn makes it more predictable and
less surprising. In particular, this addresses the use case where one opens
the text editor, starts reading code for a while, and only later issues the
first goto-definition request. Before this PR, that first goto-definition request
is guaranteed to have high latency in any reasonably sized project. But
after this PR, there's a good chance that it will now be instant.
What this _doesn't_ address is that initial loading time. In fact, it makes it
longer by adding a phantom goto-definition request to the initial startup
sequence. However, I observed that while this did make initial loading
slower, it was overall a somewhat small (but not insignificant) fraction
of initial loading time.
-----
At least, the above is what I _want_ to do. The actual change in this PR is just a proof-of-concept. I came up with after an evening of printf-debugging. Once I found the spot where this cache priming should go, I was unsure of how to generate a phantom input. So I just took an input I knew worked from my printf-debugging and hacked it in. Obviously, what I'd like to do is make this more general such that it will always work.
I don't know whether this is the "right" approach or not. My guess is that there is perhaps a cleaner solution that more directly primes whatever cache is being lazily populated rather than fudging the issue with a phantom goto-definition request.
I created this as a draft PR because I'd really like help making this general. I think whether y'all want to accept this patch is perhaps a separate question. IMO, it seems like a good idea, but to be honest, I'm happy to maintain this patch on my own since it's so trivial. But I would like to generalize it so that it will work in any project.
My thinking is that all I really need to do is find a file and a token somewhere in the loaded project, and then use that as input. But I don't quite know how to connect all the data structures to do that. Any help would be appreciated!
cc @matklad since I've been a worm in your ear about this problem. :-)
Co-authored-by: Andrew Gallant <jamslam@gmail.com>
Andrew Gallant [Sat, 25 Apr 2020 03:30:49 +0000 (23:30 -0400)]
main: eagerly prime goto-definition caches
This commit makes RA more aggressive about eagerly priming the caches.
In particular, this fixes an issue where even after RA was done priming
its caches, an initial goto-definition request would have very high
latency. This fixes that issue by requesting syntax highlighting for
everything. It is presumed that this is a tad wasteful, but not overly
so.
This commit also tweaks the logic that determines when the cache is
primed. Namely, instead of just priming it when the state is loaded
initially, we attempt to prime it whenever some state changes. This
fixes an issue where if a modification notification is seen before cache
priming is done, it would stop the cache priming early.
4128: Include correct item path for variant completions r=matklad a=jonas-schievink
The test would previously suggest `E::V`, which is not enough to name the variant as the enum is in a module. Now it correctly suggests the full path `m::E::V`.
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
3998: Make add_function generate functions in other modules via qualified path r=matklad a=TimoFreiberg
Additional feature for #3639
- [x] Add tests for paths with more segments
- [x] Make generating the function in another file work
- [x] Add `pub` or `pub(crate)` to the generated function if it's generated in a different module
- [x] Make the assist jump to the edited file
- [x] Enable file support in the `check_assist` helper
4006: Syntax highlighting for format strings r=matklad a=ltentrup
I have an implementation for syntax highlighting for format string modifiers `{}`.
The first commit refactors the changes in #3826 into a separate struct.
The second commit implements the highlighting: first we check in a macro call whether the macro is a format macro from `std`. In this case, we remember the format string node. If we encounter this node during syntax highlighting, we check for the format modifiers `{}` using regular expressions.
There are a few places which I am not quite sure:
- Is the way I extract the macro names correct?
- Is the `HighlightTag::Attribute` suitable for highlighting the `{}`?
Let me know what you think, any feedback is welcome!
4126: Don't omit methods with self from path completion r=matklad a=jonas-schievink
It's sometimes useful to create a reference to these items (eg. for use as a function pointer). Perhaps these should be given lower score though, if that's possible?
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
I've hacked together some basic completions for a few builtin attributes.
* I have no idea what `CompletionItemKind` we should set for them.
* There's plenty of fancy stuff we could do by detecting the item the attribute is being added to. Nothing of that here.
* Maybe we could complete as soon as you type `#` or `#!`?
I'm not sure what info exactly we can dump on `CompletionContext` and what we should query during the completion calculation itself. I've assumed adding an `is_attribute` field is OK, since it allows to discard the completion quickly if it doesn't apply. Later we inspect the AST to find out whether it is an inner attribute or not.
If `hierarchicalDocumentSymbolSupport` is not true in the client capabilites
then it does not support the `DocumentSymbol[]` return type from the
`textDocument/documentSymbol` request and we must fall back to `SymbolInformation[]`.
This is one of the few requests that use the client capabilities to
differentiate between return types and could cause problems for clients.
See https://github.com/microsoft/language-server-protocol/pull/538#issuecomment-442510767 for more context.
I might be reading this wrong, but it looks like we are setting it to
essentially arbitrary string at the moment, as there are no defined
order on the items in the *set* of completions.
projects / rust.git / log