Michael Howell [Tue, 13 Sep 2022 19:25:32 +0000 (12:25 -0700)]
rustdoc: remove outdated CSS `.content table` etc
The `.content table` / `.content td` / `.content tr` family of selectors date
back to 4fd061c426902b0904c65e64a3780b21f9ab3afb, when module indexes and
other parts of rustdoc used `<table>` tags for layout and content
presentation. The `.content td h1, .content td h2` has only been changed
since then to tweak the font size in dd5ff428edbc7cd4fa600b81f27bbec28589704f.
It may also have affected a few other tables over the last decade, but
they've been gradually replaced with grid layouts and flexbox to make layouts
that work better on narrow viewports. For example, 34bd2b845b3acd84c5a9bddae3ff8081c19ec5e9.
These rules have no affect on the appearance of docblock tables
===============================================================
.content table {
border-spacing: 0 5px;
}
According to MDN, [border-spacing] only has an effect when `border-collapse`
is `separate`. However, `border-collapse: collapse` is set globally for all
tables, so this rule does nothing.
Tables with paragraphs in them are impossible without dropping down to raw
HTML. Also, the rustdoc stylesheet sets paragraphs to have no top margin
anyway, so this rule is a no-op.
Tables with headers in them are impossible without dropping down to raw HTML.
This is considered unlikely, especially since it looks weird right now
(`.docblock h2` has an underline that is redundant with the table cell's own
border).
.content tr:first-child td { border-top: 0; }
This has no effect because of border collapsing.
This rule is removed, because tables look fine without it
=========================================================
.content td:first-child { padding-right: 20px; }
By removing this rule, the first cell in each row has the same padding as all
other cells in the row.
This rule is kept, and converted to directly target `.docblock`
===============================================================
.content td { vertical-align: top; }
Removing this rule would cause it to be aligned to the middle instead.
Auto merge of #101615 - compiler-errors:rpitit-perf, r=oli-obk
Make `compare_predicate_entailment` no longer a query
Make `compare_predicate_entailment` so it's no longer a query (again), and splits out the new logic (that equates the return types to infer RPITITs) into its own query. This means that this new query (now called `collect_trait_impl_trait_tys`) is no longer executed for non-RPITIT cases.
This should improve perf (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/101224#issuecomment-1241682203), though in practice we see that these some crates remain from the primary regressions list on the original report... They are all <= 0.43% regression and seemingly only on the incr-full scenario for all of them.
I am at a loss for what might be causing this regression other than what I fixed here, since we don't introduce much new non-RPITIT logic except for some `def_kind` query calls in some places, for example, like projection. Maybe that's it?
----
Originally this PR was opened to test enabling `cache_on_disk` (62164aaaa11) but that didn't turn out to be very useful (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/101615#issuecomment-1242403205), so that led me to just split the query (and rename the PR).
Auto merge of #101757 - Dylan-DPC:rollup-wkt6oe9, r=Dylan-DPC
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #101602 (Streamline `AttrAnnotatedTokenStream`)
- #101690 (Avoid `Iterator::last`)
- #101700 (A `SubstitutionPart` is not considered a deletion if it replaces nothing with nothing)
- #101745 (Fix typo in concat_bytes documentation)
- #101748 (rustdoc: remove redundant CSS `#source-sidebar, #sidebar-toggle`)
Rollup merge of #101690 - kadiwa4:avoid_iterator_last, r=oli-obk
Avoid `Iterator::last`
Adapters like `Filter` and `Map` use the default implementation of `Iterator::last` which is not short-circuiting (and so does `core::str::Split`). The predicate function will be run for every single item of the underlying iterator. I hope that removing those calls to `last` results in slight performance improvements.
Auto merge of #96709 - jackh726:gats-stabilization, r=compiler-errors
Stabilize generic associated types
Closes #44265
r? `@nikomatsakis`
# ⚡ Status of the discussion ⚡
* [x] There have been several serious concerns raised, [summarized here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/96709#issuecomment-1129311660).
* [x] There has also been a [deep-dive comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/96709#issuecomment-1167220240) explaining some of the "patterns of code" that are enabled by GATs, based on use-cases posted to this thread or on the tracking issue.
* [x] We have modeled some aspects of GATs in [a-mir-formality](https://github.com/nikomatsakis/a-mir-formality) to give better confidence in how they will be resolved in the future. [You can read a write-up here](https://github.com/rust-lang/types-team/blob/master/minutes/2022-07-08-implied-bounds-and-wf-checking.md).
* [x] The major points of the discussion have been [summarized on the GAT initiative repository](https://rust-lang.github.io/generic-associated-types-initiative/mvp.html).
* [x] [FCP has been proposed](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/96709#issuecomment-1129311660) and we are awaiting final decisions and discussion amidst the relevant team members.
# Stabilization proposal
This PR proposes the stabilization of `#![feature(generic_associated_types)]`. While there a number of future additions to be made and bugs to be fixed (both discussed below), properly doing these will require significant language design and will ultimately likely be backwards-compatible. Given the overwhelming desire to have some form of generic associated types (GATs) available on stable and the stability of the "simple" uses, stabilizing the current subset of GAT features is almost certainly the correct next step.
There are a myriad of potential use cases for GATs. Stabilization unblocks probable future language features (e.g. async functions in traits), potential future standard library features (e.g. a `LendingIterator` or some form of `Iterator` with a lifetime generic), and a plethora of user use cases (some of which can be seen just by scrolling through the tracking issue and looking at all the issues linking to it).
There are a myriad of potential use cases for GATs. First, there are many users that have chosen to not use GATs primarily because they are not stable (some of which can be seen just by scrolling through the tracking issue and looking at all the issues linking to it). Second, while language feature desugaring isn't *blocked* on stabilization, it gives more confidence on using the feature. Likewise, library features like `LendingIterator` are not necessarily blocked on stabilization to be implemented unstably; however few, if any, public-facing APIs actually use unstable features.
This feature has a long history of design, discussion, and developement - the RFC was first introduced roughly 6 years ago. While there are still a number of features left to implement and bugs left to fix, it's clear that it's unlikely those will have backwards-incompatibility concerns. Additionally, the bugs that do exist do not strongly impede the most-common use cases.
## What is stabilized
The primary language feature stabilized here is the ability to have generics on associated types, as so. Additionally, where clauses on associated types will now be accepted, regardless if the associated type is generic or not.
```rust
trait ATraitWithGATs {
type Assoc<'a, T> where T: 'a;
}
trait ATraitWithoutGATs<'a, T> {
type Assoc where T: 'a;
}
```
When adding an impl for a trait with generic associated types, the generics for the associated type are copied as well. Note that where clauses are allowed both after the specified type and before the equals sign; however, the latter is a warn-by-default deprecation.
```rust
struct X;
struct Y;
impl ATraitWithGATs for X {
type Assoc<'a, T> = &'a T
where T: 'a;
}
impl ATraitWithGATs for Y {
type Assoc<'a, T>
where T: 'a
= &'a T;
}
```
To use a GAT in a function, generics are specified on the associated type, as if it was a struct or enum. GATs can also be specified in trait bounds:
GATs can also appear in trait methods. However, depending on how they are used, they may confer where clauses on the associated type definition. More information can be found [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87479). Briefly, where clauses are required when those bounds can be proven in the methods that *construct* the GAT or other associated types that use the GAT in the trait. This allows impls to have maximum flexibility in the types defined for the associated type.
To take a relatively simple example:
```rust
trait Iterable {
type Item<'a>;
type Iterator<'a>: Iterator<Item = Self::Item<'a>>;
fn iter<'x>(&'x self) -> Self::Iterator<'x>;
//^ We know that `Self: 'a` for `Iterator<'a>`, so we require that bound on `Iterator`
// `Iterator` uses `Self::Item`, so we also require a `Self: 'a` on `Item` too
}
```
A couple well-explained examples are available in a previous [blog post](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2021/08/03/GATs-stabilization-push.html).
## What isn't stabilized/implemented
### Universal type/const quantification
Currently, you can write a bound like `X: for<'a> Trait<Assoc<'a> = &'a ()>`. However, you cannot currently write `for<T> X: Trait<Assoc<T> = T>` or `for<const N> X: Trait<Assoc<N> = [usize; N]>`.
let ty: Box<dyn for<'a> Trait<Assoc<'a> = &'a ()>>;
//^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ not allowed
```
### Higher-kinded types
You cannot write currently (and there are no current plans to implement this):
```rust
struct Struct<'a> {}
fn foo(s: for<'a> Struct<'a>) {}
```
## Tests
There are many tests covering GATs that can be found in `src/test/ui/generic-associated-types`. Here, I'll list (in alphanumeric order) tests highlight some important behavior or contain important patterns.
- `./parse/*`: Parsing of GATs in traits and impls, and the trait path with GATs
- `./collections-project-default.rs`: Interaction with associated type defaults
- `./collections.rs`: The `Collection` pattern
- `./const-generics-gat-in-trait-return-type-*.rs`: Const parameters
- `./constraint-assoc-type-suggestion.rs`: Emit correct syntax in suggestion
- `./cross-crate-bounds.rs`: Ensure we handles bounds across crates the same
- `./elided-in-expr-position.rs`: Disallow lifetime elision in return position
- `./gat-in-trait-path-undeclared-lifetime.rs`: Ensure we error on undeclared lifetime in trait path
- `./gat-in-trait-path.rs`: Base trait path case
- `./gat-trait-path-generic-type-arg.rs`: Don't allow shadowing of parameters
- `./gat-trait-path-parenthesised-args.rs`: Don't allow paranthesized args in trait path
- `./generic-associated-types-where.rs`: Ensure that we require where clauses from trait to be met on impl
- `./impl_bounds.rs`: Check that the bounds on GATs in an impl are checked
- `./issue-76826.rs`: `Windows` pattern
- `./issue-78113-lifetime-mismatch-dyn-trait-box.rs`: Implicit 'static diagnostics
- `./issue-84931.rs`: Ensure that we have a where clause on GAT to ensure trait parameter lives long enough
- `./issue-87258_a.rs`: Unconstrained opaque type with TAITs
- `./issue-87429-2.rs`: Ensure we can use bound vars in the bounds
- `./issue-87429-associated-type-default.rs`: Ensure bounds hold with associated type defaults, for both trait and impl
- `./issue-87429-specialization.rs`: Check that bounds hold under specialization
- `./issue-88595.rs`: Under the outlives lint, we require a bound for both trait and GAT lifetime when trait lifetime is used in function
- `./issue-90014.rs`: Lifetime bounds are checked with TAITs
- `./issue-91139.rs`: Under migrate mode, but not NLL, we don't capture implied bounds from HRTB lifetimes used in a function and GATs
- `./issue-91762.rs`: We used to too eagerly pick param env candidates when normalizing with GATs. We now require explicit parameters specified.
- `./issue-95305.rs`: Disallow lifetime elision in trait paths
- `./iterable.rs`: `Iterable` pattern
- `./method-unsatified-assoc-type-predicate.rs`: Print predicates with GATs correctly in method resolve error
- `./missing_lifetime_const.rs`: Ensure we must specify lifetime args (not elidable)
- `./missing-where-clause-on-trait.rs`: Ensure we don't allow stricter bounds on impl than trait
- `./parameter_number_and_kind_impl.rs`: Ensure paramters on GAT in impl match GAT in trait
- `./pointer_family.rs`: `PointerFamily` pattern
- `./projection-bound-cycle.rs`: Don't allow invalid cycles to prove bounds
- `./self-outlives-lint.rs`: Ensures that an e.g. `Self: 'a` is written on the traits GAT if that bound can be implied from the GAT usage in the trait
- `./shadowing.rs`: Don't allow lifetime shadowing in params
- `./streaming_iterator.rs`: `StreamingIterator`(`LendingIterator`) pattern
- `./trait-objects.rs`: Disallow trait objects for traits with GATs
- `./variance_constraints.rs`: Require that GAT substs be invariant
## Remaining bugs and open issues
A full list of remaining open issues can be found at: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/F-generic_associated_types
There are some `known-bug` tests in-tree at `src/test/ui/generic-associated-types/bugs`.
Here I'll categorize most of those that GAT bugs (or involve a pattern found more with GATs), but not those that include GATs but not a GAT issue in and of itself. (I also won't include issues directly for things listed elsewhere here.)
Using the concrete type of a GAT instead of the projection type can give errors, since lifetimes are chosen to be early-bound vs late-bound.
- #85533
- #87803
In certain cases, we can run into cycle or overflow errors. This is more generally a problem with associated types.
- #87755
- #87758
Bounds on an associatd type need to be proven by an impl, but where clauses need to be proven by the usage. This can lead to confusion when users write one when they mean the other.
- #87831
- #90573
We sometimes can't normalize closure signatures fully. Really an asociated types issue, but might happen a bit more frequently with GATs, since more obvious place for HRTB lifetimes.
- #88382
When calling a function, we assign types to parameters "too late", after we already try (and fail) to normalize projections. Another associated types issue that might pop up more with GATs.
- #88460
- #96230
We don't fully have implied bounds for lifetimes appearing in GAT trait paths, which can lead to unconstrained type errors.
- #88526
Suggestion for adding lifetime bounds can suggest unhelpful fixes (`T: 'a` instead of `Self: 'a`), but the next compiler error after making the suggested change is helpful.
- #90816
- #92096
- #95268
We can end up requiring that `for<'a> I: 'a` when we really want `for<'a where I: 'a> I: 'a`. This can leave unhelpful errors than effectively can't be satisfied unless `I: 'static`. Requires bigger changes and not only GATs.
- #91693
Unlike with non-generic associated types, we don't eagerly normalize with param env candidates. This is intended behavior (for now), to avoid accidentaly stabilizing picking arbitrary impls.
- #91762
Some Iterator adapter patterns (namely `filter`) require Polonius or unsafe to work.
- #92985
## Potential Future work
### Universal type/const quantification
No work has been done to implement this. There are also some questions around implied bounds.
### Object-safe GATs
The intention is to make traits with GATs object-safe. There are some design work to be done around well-formedness rules and general implementation.
### GATified std lib types
It would be helpful to either introduce new std lib traits (like `LendingIterator`) or to modify existing ones (adding a `'a` generic to `Iterator::Item`). There also a number of other candidates, like `Index`/`IndexMut` and `Fn`/`FnMut`/`FnOnce`.
### Reduce the need for `for<'a>`
Seen [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1598#issuecomment-2611378730). One possible syntax:
```rust
trait Iterable {
type Iter<'a>: Iterator<Item = Self::Item<'a>>;
}
fn foo<T>() where T: Iterable, T::Item<let 'a>: Display { } //note the `let`!
```
### Better implied bounds on higher-ranked things
Currently if we have a `type Item<'a> where self: 'a`, and a `for<'a> T: Iterator<Item<'a> = &'a ()`, this requires `for<'a> Self: 'a`. Really, we want `for<'a where T: 'a> ...`
There was some mentions of this all the back in the RFC thread [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1598#issuecomment-264340514).
## Alternatives
### Make generics on associated type in bounds a binder
Imagine the bound `for<'a> T: Trait<Item<'a>= &'a ()>`. It might be that `for<'a>` is "too large" and it should instead be `T: Trait<for<'a> Item<'a>= &'a ()>`. Brought up in RFC thread [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1598#issuecomment-229443863) and in a few places since.
Another related question: Is `for<'a>` the right syntax? Maybe `where<'a>`? Also originally found in RFC thread [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1598#issuecomment-261639969).
### Stabilize lifetime GATs first
This has been brought up a few times. The idea is to only allow GATs with lifetime parameters to in initial stabilization. This was probably most useful prior to actual implementation. At this point, lifetimes, types, and consts are all implemented and work. It feels like an arbitrary split without strong reason.
## History
* On 2016-04-30, [RFC opened](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1598)
* On 2017-09-02, RFC merged and [tracking issue opened](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44265)
* On 2017-10-23, [Move Generics from MethodSig to TraitItem and ImplItem](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/44766)
* On 2017-12-01, [Generic Associated Types Parsing & Name Resolution](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/45904)
* On 2017-12-15, [https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/46706](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/46706)
* On 2018-04-23, [Feature gate where clauses on associated types](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/49368)
* On 2018-05-10, [Extend tests for RFC1598 (GAT)](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/49423)
* On 2018-05-24, [Finish implementing GATs (Chalk)](https://github.com/rust-lang/chalk/pull/134)
* On 2019-12-21, [Make GATs less ICE-prone](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/67160)
* On 2020-02-13, [fix lifetime shadowing check in GATs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/68938)
* On 2020-06-20, [Projection bound validation](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/72788)
* On 2020-10-06, [Separate projection bounds and predicates](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/73905)
* On 2021-02-05, [Generic associated types in trait paths](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/79554)
* On 2021-02-06, [Trait objects do not work with generic associated types](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81823)
* On 2021-04-28, [Make traits with GATs not object safe](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/84622)
* On 2021-05-11, [Improve diagnostics for GATs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/82272)
* On 2021-07-16, [Make GATs no longer an incomplete feature](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/84623)
* On 2021-07-16, [Replace associated item bound vars with placeholders when projecting](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/86993)
* On 2021-07-26, [GATs: Decide whether to have defaults for `where Self: 'a`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87479)
* On 2021-08-25, [Normalize projections under binders](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/85499)
* On 2021-08-03, [The push for GATs stabilization](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2021/08/03/GATs-stabilization-push.html)
* On 2021-08-12, [Detect stricter constraints on gats where clauses in impls vs trait](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/88336)
* On 2021-09-20, [Proposal: Change syntax of where clauses on type aliases](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/89122)
* On 2021-11-06, [Implementation of GATs outlives lint](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/89970)
* On 2021-12-29. [Parse and suggest moving where clauses after equals for type aliases](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/92118)
* On 2022-01-15, [Ignore static lifetimes for GATs outlives lint](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/92865)
* On 2022-02-08, [Don't constrain projection predicates with inference vars in GAT substs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/92917)
* On 2022-02-15, [Rework GAT where clause check](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93820)
* On 2022-02-19, [Only mark projection as ambiguous if GAT substs are constrained](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93892)
* On 2022-03-03, [Support GATs in Rustdoc](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/94009)
* On 2022-03-06, [Change location of where clause on GATs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/90076)
* On 2022-05-04, [A shiny future with GATs blog post](https://jackh726.github.io/rust/2022/05/04/a-shiny-future-with-gats.html)
* On 2022-05-04, [Stabilization PR](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/96709)
Auto merge of #100640 - reitermarkus:socket-display-buffer, r=thomcc
Use `DisplayBuffer` for socket addresses.
Continuation of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/100625 for socket addresses.
Renames `net::addr` to `net::addr::socket`, `net::ip` to `net::addr::ip` and `net::ip::display_buffer::IpDisplayBuffer` to `net::addr::display_buffer::DisplayBuffer`.
Auto merge of #100101 - BelovDV:issue-99429, r=petrochenkov
change rlib format to distinguish native dependencies
Another one method to solve problem mentioned in #99429.
Changed .rlib format, it contains all bundled native libraries as archieves.
At link time rlib is unpacked and native dependencies linked separately.
New behavior hidden under separate_native_rlib_dependencies flag.
Auto merge of #99556 - davidtwco:collapse-debuginfo, r=wesleywiser
ssa: implement `#[collapse_debuginfo]`
cc #39153 rust-lang/compiler-team#386
Debuginfo line information for macro invocations are collapsed by default - line information are replaced by the line of the outermost expansion site. Using `-Zdebug-macros` disables this behaviour.
When the `collapse_debuginfo` feature is enabled, the default behaviour is reversed so that debuginfo is not collapsed by default. In addition, the `#[collapse_debuginfo]` attribute is available and can be applied to macro definitions which will then have their line information collapsed.
Auto merge of #101716 - Dylan-DPC:rollup-ayvh6nd, r=Dylan-DPC
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #100293 (Add inline-llvm option for disabling/enabling LLVM inlining)
- #100767 (Remove manual <[u8]>::escape_ascii)
- #101668 (Suggest pub instead of public for const type item)
- #101671 (Fix naming format of IEEE 754 standard)
- #101676 (Check that the types in return position `impl Trait` in traits are well-formed)
- #101681 (Deny return-position `impl Trait` in traits for object safety)
- #101693 (Update browser UI test 0 10)
- #101701 (Rustdoc-Json: Add tests for trait impls.)
- #101706 (rustdoc: remove no-op `#search`)
Rollup merge of #101676 - compiler-errors:rpitit-wf, r=lcnr
Check that the types in return position `impl Trait` in traits are well-formed
This effectively duplicates `check_associated_type_bounds`, but that shouldn't be for long, since we're going to remove it once we refactor RPITITs into regular associated items.
currently, but that's for a different reason, which is that we don't currently check that a trait function's return type is sized (i.e. `fn bar() -> [u8]` also works in a trait).
Rollup merge of #101671 - LingMan:ieee_754, r=Dylan-DPC
Fix naming format of IEEE 754 standard
Currently the documentation of f64::min refers to "IEEE-754 2008" while the documentation of f64::minimum refers to "IEEE 754-2019".
Note that one has the format IEEE,hyphen,number,space,year while the other is IEEE,space,number,hyphen,year. The official IEEE site [1] uses the later format and it is also the one most commonly used throughout the codebase.
Update all comments and - more importantly - documentation to consistently use the official format.
Rollup merge of #100293 - yanchen4791:add-inline-llvm-option, r=nnethercote
Add inline-llvm option for disabling/enabling LLVM inlining
In this PR, a new -Z option `inline-llvm` is added in order to be able to turn on/off LLVM inlining.
The capability of turning on/off inlining in LLVM backend is needed for testing performance implications of using recently enabled inlining in rustc's frontend (with -Z inline-mir=yes option, #91743). It would be interesting to see the performance effect using rustc's frontend inlining only without LLVM inlining enabled. Currently LLVM is still doing inlining no mater what value inline-mir is set to. With the option `inline-llvm` being added in this PR, user can turn off LLVM inlining by using `-Z inline-llvm=no` option (the default of inline-llvm is 'yes', LLVM inlining enabled).
Auto merge of #101442 - joboet:null_check_tcs, r=thomcc
Check if TCS is a null pointer on SGX
The `EENTER` instruction only checks if the TCS is aligned, not if it zero. Saying the address returned is a `NonNull<u8>` (for which `Tcs` is a type alias) is unsound. As well-behaved runners will not put the TCS at address zero, so the definition of `Tcs` is correct. However, `std` should check the address before casting it to a `NonNull`.
I don't know what the right approach is here. There were a few suggestions in the issue, and they all seem a bit thorny to implement. So I just picked one that was kind of familiar.
Auto merge of #101678 - jannic:fix-101640, r=jyn514
Add diagnostic arg 'current_crate'
With this fix, I get almost the same error message as on stable, again.
However, I expected to get the new error message `std is required by {$current_crate} because it does not declare #![no_std]`, but I didn't. Instead, I got a new line `help: consider building the standard library from source with cargo build -Zbuild-std`. So I obviously do not fully understand what is going on.
In any case, the bug itself seems to be fixed by this patch.
Auto merge of #101682 - compiler-errors:rpitit-encode, r=fee1-dead
Only encode return-position `impl Trait` in trait when parent function has a default body
Semi-blocked on #101679, because I can't currently write a test for when we _should_ encode the type of the return-position `impl Trait` in trait, which is when a trait has a default function body, like so:
Though this can land even without #101679, since it does prevent ICEs from occuring any time you use `#![feature(return_position_impl_trait_in_trait)]` in a library, which is kind annoying.
Auto merge of #101673 - crlf0710:generator_clone, r=oli-obk
Allow generators to impl Clone/Copy
Revives #95137. It's a pity that the original pr didn't land because the implementation is almost complete! All credits goes to `@canndrew,` and i just resolved the merge conflicts and updated the feature gate version number.
Auto merge of #101670 - obi1kenobi:patch-1, r=jyn514
Add @obi1kenobi to the cc list for rustdoc-json-types
I'm one of the maintainers of `cargo-semver-checks`, and as mentioned [in Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/266220-rustdoc/topic/Long.20Term.20Rustdoc.20JSON.20Stability) it's very useful to me to know about upcoming rustdoc JSON types changes so I can be ready to publish new `cargo-semver-checks` releases compatible with the new JSON format.
Auto merge of #101482 - joboet:netbsd_parker, r=sanxiyn
Optimize thread parking on NetBSD
As the futex syscall is not present in the latest stable release, NetBSD cannot use the efficient thread parker and locks Linux uses. Currently, it therefore relies on a pthread-based parker, consisting of a mutex and semaphore which protect a state variable. NetBSD however has more efficient syscalls available: [`_lwp_park`](https://man.netbsd.org/_lwp_park.2) and [`_lwp_unpark`](https://man.netbsd.org/_lwp_unpark.2). These already provide the exact semantics of `thread::park` and `Thread::unpark`, but work with thread ids. In `std`, this ID is here stored in an atomic state variable, which is also used to optimize cases were the parking token is already available at the time `thread::park` is called.
Currently the documentation of f64::min refers to "IEEE-754 2008" while the documentation of
f64::minimum refers to "IEEE 754-2019".
Note that one has the format IEEE,hyphen,number,space,year while the other is
IEEE,space,number,hyphen,year. The official IEEE site [1] uses the later format and it is also the
one most commonly used throughout the codebase.
Update all comments and - more importantly - documentation to consistently use the official format.
Auto merge of #101613 - GuillaumeGomez:codeblock-tooltip, r=notriddle
Simplify codeblock and their associated tooltip
It is based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/101600 so it needs to wait for this one to be merged first.
This PR does two things:
* Remove CSS class duplication by setting CSS classes such as `compile_fail` directly on the `div` wrapping both the codeblock and the tooltip.
* Simplify DOM: no need to wrap the tooltip into a `<div>`, it can work just as well without it.
You can test it [here](https://rustdoc.crud.net/imperio/codeblock-tooltip/std/string/struct.String.html#deref).
projects / rust.git / log