Hadley Canine [Tue, 5 Mar 2019 14:52:38 +0000 (14:52 +0000)]
Remove JSBackend from config.toml
JSBackend is implied when building the emscripten backend, and not available for the standard llvm backend. This commit also puts the example config in sync with the defaults in src/bootstrap/native.rs
Josh Stone [Mon, 4 Mar 2019 23:12:45 +0000 (15:12 -0800)]
Add as_slice() to slice::IterMut and vec::Drain
In bluss/indexmap#88, we found that there was no easy way to implement
`Debug` for our `IterMut` and `Drain` iterators. Those are built on
`slice::IterMut` and `vec::Drain`, which implement `Debug` themselves,
but have no other way to access their data. With a new `as_slice()`
method, we can read the data and customize its presentation.
Josh Stone [Mon, 4 Mar 2019 21:28:31 +0000 (13:28 -0800)]
Add an explicit test for issue #50582
This code no longer ICEs, and @yodaldevoid found that it was fixed by
commit fe5710a. While that added a similar test, we can explicitly test
this reproducer too.
bors [Mon, 4 Mar 2019 04:46:38 +0000 (04:46 +0000)]
Auto merge of #58380 - estebank:missing-match-pats, r=zackmdavis
Point at enum definition when match patterns are not exhaustive
```
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: type `X` is non-empty
--> file.rs:9:11
|
1 | / enum X {
2 | | A,
| | - variant not covered
3 | | B,
| | - variant not covered
4 | | C,
| | - variant not covered
5 | | }
| |_- `X` defined here
...
9 | match x {
| ^
|
= help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled, possibly by adding wildcards or more match arms
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `B` and `C` not covered
--> file.rs:11:11
|
1 | / enum X {
2 | | A,
3 | | B,
4 | | C,
| | - not covered
5 | | }
| |_- `X` defined here
...
11 | match x {
| ^ patterns `C` not covered
```
When a match expression doesn't have patterns covering every variant,
point at the enum's definition span. On a best effort basis, point at the
variant(s) that are missing. This does not handle the case when the missing
pattern is due to a field's enum variants:
```
enum E1 {
A,
B,
C,
}
enum E2 {
A(E1),
B,
}
fn foo() {
match E2::A(E1::A) {
E2::A(E1::B) => {}
E2::B => {}
}
//~^ ERROR `E2::A(E1::A)` and `E2::A(E1::C)` not handled
}
```
Unify look between match with no arms and match with some missing patterns.
bors [Sun, 3 Mar 2019 22:49:16 +0000 (22:49 +0000)]
Auto merge of #58505 - schomatis:fix/nll/remove-live-var, r=matthewjasper
[NLL] Remove `LiveVar`
The `LiveVar` type (and related) made it harder to reason about the code. It seemed as an abstraction that didn't bring any useful concept to the reader (when transitioning from the RFC theory to the actual implementation code).
It achieved a compactness in the vectors storing the def/use/drop information that was related only to the `LocalUseMap`. This PR went in the other direction and favored time over memory (but this decision can be easily reverted to the other side without reintroducing `LiveVar`).
What this PR aims at is to clarify that there's no significant transformation between the MIR `Local` and the `LiveVar` (now refactored as `live_locals: Vec<Local>`): we're just filtering (not mapping) the entire group of `Local`s into a meaningful subset that we should perform the liveness analysis on.
As a side note, there is no guarantee that the liveness analysis is performed only on (what the code calls) "live" variables, if the NLL facts are requested it will be performed on *any* variable so there can't be any assumptions on that regard. (Still, this PR didn't change the general naming convention to reduce the number of changes here and streamline the review process).
**Acceptance criteria:** This PR attempts to do only a minor refactoring and not to change the logic so it can't have any performance impact, particularly, it can't lose any of the significant performance improvement achieved in the great work done in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/52115.
benaryorg [Sun, 3 Mar 2019 14:21:52 +0000 (15:21 +0100)]
race condition in thread local storage example
The example had a potential race condition that would still pass the test.
If the thread which was supposed to modify it's own thread local was slower than the instruction to
modify in the main thread, then the test would pass even in case of a failure.
This is would be minor if the child thread was waited for since it check using an `assert_eq` for
the same thing, but vice versa.
However, if the `assert_eq` failed this would trigger a panic, which is not at all caught by the
example since the thread is not waited on.
bors [Sun, 3 Mar 2019 16:46:12 +0000 (16:46 +0000)]
Auto merge of #58673 - matthewjasper:typeck-ptr-coercions, r=pnkfelix
[NLL] Type check operations with pointer types
It seems these were forgotten about. Moving to `Rvalue::AddressOf` simplifies the coercions from references, but I want this to be fixed as soon as possible.
kennytm [Sun, 3 Mar 2019 05:56:57 +0000 (13:56 +0800)]
Rollup merge of #58865 - dlrobertson:fix-varargs, r=alexreg
Fix C-variadic function printing
There is no longer a need to append the string `", ..."` to a functions
args as `...` is parsed as an argument and will appear in the functions
arguments.
bors [Sun, 3 Mar 2019 03:00:16 +0000 (03:00 +0000)]
Auto merge of #58464 - jethrogb:jb/std-test-panic-output, r=alexcrichton
Use the correct stderr when testing libstd
When compiling the unit tests for libstd, there are two copies of `std` in existence, see [lib.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/919cf42/src/libstd/lib.rs#L335-L341). This means there are two copies of everything, including thread local variable definitions. Before this PR, it's possible that libtest would configure a stderr sink in one of those copies, whereas the panic logic would inspect the sink in the other copy, resulting in libtest missing the relevant panic message. This PR makes sure that when testing, the panic logic always accesses the stderr sink from “realstd”, using the same logic that libtest uses.
Esteban Küber [Sun, 10 Feb 2019 13:12:00 +0000 (05:12 -0800)]
Point at enum definition when match patterns are not exhaustive
```
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: type `X` is non-empty
--> file.rs:9:11
|
1 | / enum X {
2 | | A,
| | - variant not covered
3 | | B,
| | - variant not covered
4 | | C,
| | - variant not covered
5 | | }
| |_- `X` defined here
...
9 | match x {
| ^
|
= help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled, possibly by adding wildcards or more match arms
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `B` and `C` not covered
--> file.rs:11:11
|
1 | / enum X {
2 | | A,
3 | | B,
4 | | C,
| | - not covered
5 | | }
| |_- `X` defined here
...
11 | match x {
| ^ patterns `C` not covered
```
When a match expression doesn't have patterns covering every variant,
point at the enum's definition span. On a best effort basis, point at the
variant(s) that are missing. This does not handle the case when the missing
pattern is due to a field's enum variants:
```
enum E1 {
A,
B,
C,
}
enum E2 {
A(E1),
B,
}
fn foo() {
match E2::A(E1::A) {
E2::A(E1::B) => {}
E2::B => {}
}
//~^ ERROR `E2::A(E1::A)` and `E2::A(E1::C)` not handled
}
```
Unify look between match with no arms and match with some missing patterns.
projects / rust.git / log