kennytm [Sat, 4 Aug 2018 09:20:10 +0000 (17:20 +0800)]
Rollup merge of #53050 - carols10cents:rustdoc-moar-room, r=GuillaumeGomez
Make left column of rustdoc search results narrower
To make more room for the description of the item
The description often has useful text that helps disambiguate between search results, but very little of it is shown.
As a side effect, this breaks the alignment between the search results and the "In Return Types" tab, which tends to line up above the description-- up until I started investigating this, I thought "In Names"/"In Parameters"/"In Return Types" were column headers and I just never saw search results that had info for the "In Parameters" middle column! Now, with the two columns of search results each taking up about a half, they look more like tabs than column headers.
Types that are long still wrap and look good-- I made some artificially long types in the following screenshots.
kennytm [Sat, 4 Aug 2018 09:19:38 +0000 (17:19 +0800)]
Rollup merge of #51919 - tbu-:pr_num_to_from_bytes2, r=SimonSapin
Provide `{to,from}_{ne,le,be}_bytes` functions on integers
If one doesn't view integers as containers of bytes, converting them to
bytes necessarily needs the specfication of encoding.
I think Rust is a language that wants to be explicit. The `to_bytes`
function is basically the opposite of that – it converts an integer into
the native byte representation, but there's no mention (in the function
name) of it being very much platform dependent. Therefore, I think it
would be better to replace that method by three methods, the explicit
`to_ne_bytes` ("native endian") which does the same thing and
`to_{le,be}_bytes` which return the little- resp. big-endian encoding.
kennytm [Sat, 4 Aug 2018 06:36:02 +0000 (14:36 +0800)]
Rollup merge of #53047 - integer32llc:rustdoc-clicky-clicky, r=QuietMisdreavus
Make entire row of doc search results clickable
By adding empty `after` content that clears and is `display: block`.
Technique found here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/7817313/51683
Now any part of a documentation search result that is highlighted when
you hover over it should also be clickable.
NOTE: THE BELOW IMAGES ARE GIFS BUT I DIDN'T MAKE THEM LOOP, OPEN IN A NEW TAB TO SEE THEM SORRY SORRY
Here's what happens before this change: my mouse cursor is in the middle of the table cell, and the row is highlighted which makes it look like clicking should have an effect, but clicking doesn't do anything:
kennytm [Sat, 4 Aug 2018 06:35:53 +0000 (14:35 +0800)]
Rollup merge of #52995 - cramertj:smaller-await, r=withoutboats
Remove unnecessary local in await! generator
This makes `async { await!(future::ready(())) }` 4 bytes instead of 16. [Playground example](http://play.rust-lang.org/?gist=54c075599b9ff390fe505c75d6b98feb&version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2018)
kennytm [Sat, 4 Aug 2018 06:35:51 +0000 (14:35 +0800)]
Rollup merge of #52969 - Keruspe:local_rebuild, r=alexcrichton
rustbuild: fix local_rebuild
If we detect a local rebuild (e.g. bootstrap compiler is the same version as target compiler), we set stage to 1.
When trying to build e.g. UnstableBook, we use Mode::ToolBootstrap and stage is 1.
Just allow Mode::ToolBootstrap and stagge != 0 if we are in a local_rebuild
This fixes building current master using current beta (as master hasn't yet been bumped to 1.30).
This should be backported to beta too, as currently we cannot build beta using itself because of that.
kennytm [Sat, 4 Aug 2018 06:35:50 +0000 (14:35 +0800)]
Rollup merge of #52968 - zackmdavis:app-lint-cability, r=estebank
App-lint-cability
@eminence recently pointed out (rust-lang/cargo#5846) that it's
surprising that `cargo fix` (now shipping with Cargo itself!) doesn't
fix very common lint warnings, which is as good of a reminder as any
that we should finish #50723.
(Previously, we did this on the librustc and libsyntax crates in #50724. I filed cmr/this-week-in-rust#685 in hopes of recruiting new contributors to do the rest.)
kennytm [Sat, 4 Aug 2018 06:35:49 +0000 (14:35 +0800)]
Rollup merge of #52940 - kennytm:move-checktool-protection-week, r=alexcrichton
Align 6-week cycle check with beta promotion instead of stable release.
The regression check is to make beta promotion easier, so it makes more
sense to use the Tuesday of the release week (T-2) as the end point of the
regression prevention, instead of Thursday (T-0). But since the beta
promotion PR is sent at Tuesday evening at UTC, the protection should
include the whole Tuesday as well, meaning the 6-week cycle will start from
Wednesdays.
This will also move the start of the regression protection week one day
earlier.
bors [Fri, 3 Aug 2018 12:22:17 +0000 (12:22 +0000)]
Auto merge of #52887 - yurydelendik:disable-lld-symbols, r=alexcrichton
Disable debug sections when optimization flags is set for LLD.
Currently LLD does not error when optimization is set and debugging information sections are present. (See discussion at https://reviews.llvm.org/D47901)
bors [Fri, 3 Aug 2018 06:34:16 +0000 (06:34 +0000)]
Auto merge of #52925 - RalfJung:sanity_check, r=oli-obk
check_const: use the same ParamEnv as codegen for statics
Fixes at least part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/52849 (my CTFE-stress benchmark). Note that I do not know what I am doing here, this is just based on hints from @oli-obk.
Tobias Bucher [Fri, 29 Jun 2018 20:46:20 +0000 (22:46 +0200)]
Provide `{to,from}_{ne,le,be}_bytes` functions on integers
If one doesn't view integers as containers of bytes, converting them to
bytes necessarily needs the specfication of encoding.
I think Rust is a language that wants to be explicit. The `to_bytes`
function is basically the opposite of that – it converts an integer into
the native byte representation, but there's no mention (in the function
name) of it being very much platform dependent. Therefore, I think it
would be better to replace that method by three methods, the explicit
`to_ne_bytes` ("native endian") which does the same thing and
`to_{le,be}_bytes` which return the little- resp. big-endian encoding.
* Bring in some fixes for `cargo fix`
* Update RLS/rustfmt to keep them compiling
* Update all tools to [depend on `rustc-workspace-hack`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/52919#issuecomment-409802418)
* Change how we deal with feature unification amongst these builds.
bors [Fri, 3 Aug 2018 00:50:09 +0000 (00:50 +0000)]
Auto merge of #51657 - wesleywiser:wip_profiling, r=eddyb
Implement a self profiler
This is a work in progress implementation of #50780. I'd love feedback on the overall structure and code as well as some specific things:
- [The query categorization mechanism](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/compare/master...wesleywiser:wip_profiling?expand=1#diff-19e0a69c10eff31eb2d16805e79f3437R101). This works but looks kind of ugly to me. Perhaps there's a better way?
- [The profiler assumes only one activity can run at a time](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/compare/master...wesleywiser:wip_profiling?expand=1#diff-f8a403b2d88d873e4b27c097c614a236R177). This is obviously incompatible with the ongoing parallel queries.
- [The output code is just a bunch of `format!()`s](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/compare/master...wesleywiser:wip_profiling?expand=1#diff-f8a403b2d88d873e4b27c097c614a236R91). Is there a better way to generate markdown or json in the compiler?
- [The query categorizations are likely wrong](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/compare/master...wesleywiser:wip_profiling?expand=1#diff-19e0a69c10eff31eb2d16805e79f3437R101). I've marked what seemed obvious to me but I'm sure I got a lot of them wrong.
The overhead currently seems very low. Running `perf` on a sample compilation with profiling enabled reveals:
bors [Thu, 2 Aug 2018 21:39:14 +0000 (21:39 +0000)]
Auto merge of #52841 - petrochenkov:premacro, r=alexcrichton
resolve: Implement prelude search for macro paths, implement tool attributes
When identifier is macro path is resolved in scopes (i.e. the first path segment - `foo` in `foo::mac!()` or `foo!()`), scopes are searched in the same order as for non-macro paths - items in modules, extern prelude, tool prelude (see later), standard library prelude, language prelude, but with some extra shadowing restrictions (names from globs and macro expansions cannot shadow names from outer scopes). See the comment in `fn resolve_lexical_macro_path_segment` for more details.
"Tool prelude" currently contains two "tool modules" `rustfmt` and `clippy`, and is searched immediately after extern prelude.
This makes the [possible long-term solution](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2103-tool-attributes.md#long-term-solution) for tool attributes exactly equivalent to the existing extern prelude scheme, except that `--extern=my_crate` making crate names available in scope is replaced with something like `--tool=my_tool` making tool names available in scope.
The `tool_attributes` feature is still unstable and `#![feature(tool_attributes)]` now implicitly enables `#![feature(use_extern_macros)]`. `use_extern_macros` is a prerequisite for `tool_attributes`, so their stabilization will happen in the same order.
If `use_extern_macros` is not enabled, then tool attributes are treated as custom attributes (this is temporary, anyway).
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/52576
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/52512
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/51277
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/52269
bors [Thu, 2 Aug 2018 19:42:19 +0000 (19:42 +0000)]
Auto merge of #52782 - pnkfelix:issue-45696-dangly-paths-for-box, r=eddyb
[NLL] Dangly paths for box
Special-case `Box` in `rustc_mir::borrow_check`.
Since we know dropping a box will not access any `&mut` or `&` references, it is safe to model its destructor as only touching the contents *owned* by the box.
----
There are three main things going on here:
1. The first main thing, this PR is fixing a bug in NLL where `rustc` previously would issue a diagnostic error in a case like this:
```rust
fn foo(x: Box<&mut i32>) -> &mut i32 { &mut **x }
```
such code was accepted by the AST-borrowck in the past, but NLL was rejecting it with the following message ([playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?gist=13c5560f73bfb16d6dab3ceaad44c0f8&version=nightly&mode=release&edition=2015))
```
error[E0597]: `**x` does not live long enough
--> src/main.rs:3:40
|
3 | fn foo(x: Box<&mut i32>) -> &mut i32 { &mut **x }
| ^^^^^^^^ - `**x` dropped here while still borrowed
| |
| borrowed value does not live long enough
|
note: borrowed value must be valid for the anonymous lifetime #1 defined on the function body at 3:1...
--> src/main.rs:3:1
|
3 | fn foo(x: Box<&mut i32>) -> &mut i32 { &mut **x }
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: aborting due to previous error
```
2. The second main thing: The reason such code was previously rejected was because NLL (MIR-borrowck) incorporates a fix for issue #31567, where it models a destructor's execution as potentially accessing any borrows held by the thing being destructed. The tests with `Scribble` model this, showing that the compiler now catches such unsoundness.
However, that fix for issue #31567 is too strong, in that NLL (MIR-borrowck) includes `Box` as one of the types with a destructor that potentially accesses any borrows held by the box. This thus was the cause of the main remaining discrepancy between AST-borrowck and MIR-borrowck, as documented in issue #45696, specifically in [the last example of this comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/45696#issuecomment-345367873), which I have adapted into the `fn foo` shown above.
We did close issue #45696 back in December of 2017, but AFAICT that example was not fixed by PR #46268. (And we did not include a test, etc etc.)
This PR fixes that case, by trying to model the so-called `DerefPure` semantics of `Box<T>` when we traverse the type of the input to `visit_terminator_drop`.
3. The third main thing is that during a review of the first draft of this PR, @matthewjasper pointed out that the new traversal of `Box<T>` could cause the compiler to infinite loop. I have adjusted the PR to avoid this (by tracking what types we have previously seen), and added a much needed test of this somewhat odd scenario. (Its an odd scenario because the particular case only arises for things like `struct A(Box<A>);`, something which cannot be constructed in practice.)
bors [Thu, 2 Aug 2018 10:28:42 +0000 (10:28 +0000)]
Auto merge of #52906 - RalfJung:jemalloc, r=alexcrichton
enable jemalloc assertions when configured to do so
This is essentially a re-submission of the functional part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/43648. I was unable to reproduce the issue I had back then, maybe something changed somewhere to no longer trigger the assertion.
bors [Thu, 2 Aug 2018 08:24:14 +0000 (08:24 +0000)]
Auto merge of #52890 - djrenren:test-visibility, r=petrochenkov
Reexport tests without polluting namespaces
This should fix issue #52557.
Basically now we gensym a new name for the test function and reexport that.
That way the test function's reexport name can't conflict because it was impossible for the test author to write it down.
We then use a `use` statement to expose the original name using the original visibility.
If we detect a local rebuild (e.g. bootstrap compiler is the same version as target compiler), we set stage to 1.
When trying to build e.g. UnstableBook, we use Mode::ToolBootstrap and stage is 1.
Just allow Mode::ToolBootstrap and stagge != 0 if we are in a local_rebuild
Zack M. Davis [Thu, 2 Aug 2018 03:30:04 +0000 (20:30 -0700)]
`Applicability`-ify librustc_lint
Andrew Chin recently pointed out (rust-lang/cargo#5846) that it's
surprising that `cargo fix` (now shipping with Cargo itself!) doesn't
fix very common lint warnings, which is as good of a reminder as any
that we should finish #50723.
bors [Thu, 2 Aug 2018 04:22:23 +0000 (04:22 +0000)]
Auto merge of #52847 - upsuper:thread-stack-reserve, r=alexcrichton
Don't commit thread stack on Windows
On Windows, there is a system level resource limitation called commit limit, which is roughly the sum of physical memory + paging files[1]. `CreateThread` by default commits the stack size[2], which unnecessarily takes such resource from the shared limit.
This PR changes it to only reserve the stack size rather than commit it. Reserved memory would only take the address space of the current process until it's actually accessed.
This should make the behavior on Windows match other platforms, and is also a pretty standard practice on Windows nowadays.
bors [Thu, 2 Aug 2018 00:14:21 +0000 (00:14 +0000)]
Auto merge of #52206 - RalfJung:zst-slices, r=alexcrichton
slices: fix ZST slice iterators making up pointers; debug_assert alignment in from_raw_parts
This fixes the problem that we are fabricating pointers out of thin air. I also managed to share more code between the mutable and shared iterators, while reducing the amount of macros.
I am not sure how useful it really is to add a `debug_assert!` in libcore. Everybody gets a release version of that anyway, right? Is there at least a CI job that runs the test suite with a debug version?
bors [Wed, 1 Aug 2018 19:54:06 +0000 (19:54 +0000)]
Auto merge of #52958 - pietroalbini:rollup, r=pietroalbini
Rollup of 15 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #52793 (Add test for NLL: unexpected "free region `` does not outlive" error )
- #52799 (Use BitVector for global sets of AttrId)
- #52809 (Add test for unexpected region for local data ReStatic)
- #52834 ([NLL] Allow conflicting borrows of promoted length zero arrays)
- #52835 (Fix Alias intra doc ICE)
- #52854 (fix memrchr in miri)
- #52899 (tests/ui: Add missing mips{64} ignores)
- #52908 (Use SetLenOnDrop in Vec::truncate())
- #52915 (Don't count MIR locals as borrowed after StorageDead when finding locals live across a yield terminator)
- #52926 (rustc: Trim down the `rust_2018_idioms` lint group)
- #52930 (rustc_resolve: record single-segment extern crate import resolutions.)
- #52939 (Make io::Read::read_to_end consider io::Take::limit)
- #52942 (Another SmallVec.extend optimization)
- #52947 (1.27 actually added the `armv5te-unknown-linux-musleabi` target)
- #52954 (async can begin expressions)
projects / rust.git / log