Auto merge of #9171 - Serial-ATA:highlight-js, r=xFrednet
Update highlight.js
changelog: none
With [highlight.js v11.6.0](https://github.com/highlightjs/highlight.js/releases/tag/11.6.0), the lint list can finally update from `9.5.0`. No more EOL warning in console! :smile:
I also made it switch to the `github-dark` theme when using `coal`, instead of just always using the normal github light theme.
Auto merge of #9172 - Guilherme-Vasconcelos:master, r=flip1995
Rename rustcSource in contributing documentation
According to [rust-analyzer docs](https://rust-analyzer.github.io/manual.html#toolchain:~:text=rust%2Danalyzer.rustc.source), rustcSource has been renamed to rustc.source.
Introduces 3 new lints:
- `std_instead_of_core` - lints items resolved through `std` which are available in `core`
- `std_instead_of_alloc` - lints items resolved through `std` which are available in `alloc`
- `alloc_instead_of_core` - lints items resolved through `alloc` which are available in `core`
Though the original issue only mentions `std_instead_of_alloc`, the other two lints could be useful as well.
questions:
- what do I call the file the lints live in? I was thinking `std_reexports`?
changelog: new lint's: [`std_instead_of_core`], [`std_instead_of_alloc`], [`alloc_instead_of_core`]
Auto merge of #95956 - yaahc:stable-in-unstable, r=cjgillot
Support unstable moves via stable in unstable items
part of https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/moving.20items.20to.20core.20unstably and a blocker of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/90328.
The libs-api team needs the ability to move an already stable item to a new location unstably, in this case for Error in core. Otherwise these changes are insta-stable making them much harder to merge.
This PR attempts to solve the problem by checking the stability of path segments as well as the last item in the path itself, which is currently the only thing checked.
Auto merge of #9161 - Victor-N-Suadicani:move_format_push_string_to_pedantic, r=flip1995
Move format_push_string to restriction
Fixes #9077 (kinda) by moving the lint to the restriction group. As I noted in that issue, I think the suggested change is too much and as the OP of the issue points out, the ramifications of the change are not necessarily easily understood. As such I don't think the lint should be enabled by default.
changelog: [`format_push_string`]: moved to restriction (see #9077).
Auto merge of #99231 - Dylan-DPC:rollup-0tl8c0o, r=Dylan-DPC
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #97720 (Always create elided lifetime parameters for functions)
- #98315 (Stabilize `core::ffi:c_*` and rexport in `std::ffi`)
- #98705 (Implement `for<>` lifetime binder for closures)
- #99126 (remove allow(rustc::potential_query_instability) in rustc_span)
- #99139 (Give a better error when `x dist` fails for an optional tool)
Rollup merge of #97720 - cjgillot:all-fresh, r=petrochenkov
Always create elided lifetime parameters for functions
Anonymous and elided lifetimes in functions are sometimes (async fns) --and sometimes not (regular fns)-- desugared to implicit generic parameters.
This difference of treatment makes it some downstream analyses more complicated to handle. This step is a pre-requisite to perform lifetime elision resolution on AST.
There is currently an inconsistency in the treatment of argument-position impl-trait for functions and async fns:
```rust
trait Foo<'a> {}
fn foo(t: impl Foo<'_>) {} //~ ERROR missing lifetime specifier
async fn async_foo(t: impl Foo<'_>) {} //~ OK
fn bar(t: impl Iterator<Item = &'_ u8>) {} //~ ERROR missing lifetime specifier
async fn async_bar(t: impl Iterator<Item = &'_ u8>) {} //~ OK
```
The current implementation reports "missing lifetime specifier" on `foo`, but **accepts it** in `async_foo`.
This PR **proposes to accept** the anonymous lifetime in both cases as an extra generic lifetime parameter.
This change would be insta-stable, so let's ping t-lang.
Anonymous lifetimes in GAT bindings keep being forbidden:
```rust
fn foo(t: impl Foo<Assoc<'_> = Bar<'_>>) {}
^^ ^^
forbidden ok
```
I started a discussion here: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/Anonymous.20lifetimes.20in.20universal.20impl-trait/near/284968606
Auto merge of #99210 - Dylan-DPC:rollup-879cp1t, r=Dylan-DPC
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #98574 (Lower let-else in MIR)
- #99011 (`UnsafeCell` blocks niches inside its nested type from being available outside)
- #99030 (diagnostics: error messages when struct literals fail to parse)
- #99155 (Keep unstable target features for asm feature checking)
- #99199 (Refactor: remove an unnecessary `span_to_snippet`)
Auto merge of #9169 - Alexendoo:message-convention-regex, r=flip1995
Use `LazyLock` for `lint_message_convention` regexes
They were being recompiled for `Message::new` call, for me this shaves 7s off the time it takes to run the test. Also removes a redundant exception from the list and joins the various `message...` exceptions into one
Rollup merge of #98574 - dingxiangfei2009:let-else-thir, r=oli-obk
Lower let-else in MIR
This MR will switch to lower let-else statements in MIR building instead.
To lower let-else in MIR, we build a mini-switch two branches. One branch leads to the matching case, and the other leads to the `else` block. This arrangement will allow temporary lifetime analysis running as-is so that the temporaries are properly extended according to the same rule applied to regular `let` statements.
Auto merge of #9156 - Rqnsom:manual_flatten, r=Alexendoo
fix [`manual_flatten`] help texts order
fixes #8948
Whenever suggestion for this lint does not fit in one line,
legacy solution has some unexpected/unhandled behavior:
lint will then generate two help messages which seem to be shown in the wrong order.
The second help message in that case will contain the suggestion.
The first help message always refers to a suggestion message,
and **it should adapt** depending on the location of the suggestion:
- inline suggestion within the error/warning message
- suggestion separated into a second help text
This is my first contribution here, so I hope I didn't miss anything for creating this PR.
changelog: fix [`manual_flatten`] help texts order
Whenever suggestion for this lint does not fit in one line,
lint will generate two help messages. The second help message
will always contain the suggestion.
The first help message refers to suggestion message,
and it should adapt depending on the location of the suggestion:
- inline suggestion within the error/warning message
- suggestion separated into second help text
Auto merge of #8703 - aldhsu:add_repeated_where_clause_or_trait_bound, r=flip1995
Add `repeated_where_clause_or_trait_bound` lint
I thought I would try and scratch my own itch for #8674.
1. Is comparing the `Res` the correct way for ensuring we have the same trait?
2. Is there a way to get the spans for the bounds and clauses for suggestions?
I tried to use `GenericParam::bounds_span_for_suggestions` but it only gave me an empty span at the end of the spans.
I tried `WhereClause::span_for_predicates_or_empty_place` and it included the comma.
3. Is there a simpler way to get the trait names? I have used the spans of the traits because I didn't see a way to get it off the `Res` or `Def`.
Auto merge of #9138 - Jarcho:branches_sharing_code_2, r=giraffate
Fixes for `branches_sharing_code`
fixes #7198
fixes #7452
fixes #7555
fixes #7589
changelog: Don't suggest moving modifications to locals used in any of the condition expressions in `branches_sharing_code`
changelog: Don't suggest moving anything after a local with a significant drop in `branches_sharing_code`
Jason Newcomb [Fri, 8 Jul 2022 19:29:23 +0000 (15:29 -0400)]
Fixes for `branches_sharing_code`
* Don't suggest moving modifications to locals used in any of the condition expressions
* Don't suggest moving anything after a local with a significant drop
Jason Newcomb [Sat, 18 Jun 2022 02:21:42 +0000 (22:21 -0400)]
Changes to `let_unit_value`
* View through locals in `let_unit_value` when determining if inference is required
* Don't remove typed let bindings for more functions
Auto merge of #8958 - Alexendoo:simple_filter_map, r=giraffate
Lint simple expressions in `manual_filter_map`, `manual_find_map`
changelog: Lint simple expressions in [`manual_filter_map`], [`manual_find_map`]
The current comparison rules out `.find(|a| a.is_some()).map(|b| b.unwrap())` because `a` being a reference can effect more complicated expressions, this adds a simple check for that case and adds the necessary derefs
There's some overlap with `option_filter_map` so `lint_filter_some_map_unwrap` now returns a `bool` to indicate it linted
Auto merge of #9120 - anall:bugfix/ice9041, r=Jarcho
Fix ICE in sugg::DerefDelegate with (named) closures
rustc comiler internals helpfully tell us how to fix the issue:
```
to get the signature of a closure, use `substs.as_closure().sig()` not `fn_sig()`
```
Fixes ICE in #9041
This also makes this code in `sugg::DerefDelegate` match a different use `typ.fn_sig(…)` I found: in `mixed_read_write_in_expression` -- being strict on the value of `typ.kind()` will hopefully reduce any future possibility of ICE crashes in this area.
Auto merge of #9132 - hellow554:maybe_trait_bound_on_type_repetition, r=Manishearth
Maybe trait bound on type repetition
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog: fix maybe trait on [`type_repetition_in_bounds`] lint
I simplified the two for loops, which did exactly the same. Only downside is, that I need a `copied`, but that's to convert from `&&` to `&`, to that should be a noop?
One more thing: I only handle [`TraitBoundModifier::Maybe`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_hir/enum.TraitBoundModifier.html#variant.Maybe). Can anyone give me an example (and testcase) for [`TraitBoundModifier::MaybeConst`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_hir/enum.TraitBoundModifier.html#variant.MaybeConst)?
projects / rust.git / log