bors[bot] [Wed, 20 May 2020 07:22:53 +0000 (07:22 +0000)]
Merge #4505
4505: Infer return type of loops with value breaks r=flodiebold a=ruabmbua
Creates a type variable to represent the return value of the loop.
Uses `coerce_merge_branch` on each break with the previous value, to determine the actual return value of the loop.
This brings the time needed to compute the `add_missing_impl_members` assist down from ~5 minutes to 20 seconds on my test workload (which is editing within an impl of a MIR [`MutVisitor`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_middle/mir/visit/trait.MutVisitor.html))
cc #4498
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
impl<T, F: FnOnce() -> T> Deref for Lazy<T, F> {
type Target = T;
fn deref(&self) -> &T { todo!() }
}
fn test() {
let lazy1: Lazy<u32, _> = Lazy::new(|| 0u32);
let r1 = lazy1.to_string();
fn make_u32_fn() -> u32 { todo!() }
let make_u32_fn_ptr: fn() -> u32 = make_u32_fn;
let lazy2: Lazy<u32, _> = Lazy::new(make_u32_fn_ptr);
let r2 = lazy2.to_string();
}
```
* On current master:
* When type default is commented-out, `r1` is correctly inferred, `r2` in _{unknown}_.
* When type default is not commented-out, both `r1` and `r2` are _{unknown}_.
* With this PR:
* When type default is commented-out, both `r1` and `r2` are correctly inferred.
* When type default is not commented-out, both `r1` and `r2` are _{unknown}_.
Well, it's a improvement at least. I guess this thing with type defaults is a different problem.
I also tried add Fn impls for fn items, but wasn't successful. So this PR only adds those impls for fn pointers.
Co-authored-by: Hrvoje Ban <hban@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR
- adds an option to granularly enable\disable all CodeLens, just like the TypeScript extension.
- fixes a minor bug for doctests. It makes no sense to show `Debug` lens for them as cargo `Can't skip running doc tests with --no-run`.
I did some profiling using DHAT, and this was what I could easily optimize without much knowledge of the codebase.
This speeds up analysis-stats on rust-analyser by ~4% on my local machine.
**Benchmark**
➜ rust-analyzer-base git:(master) hyperfine --min-runs=2 '/home/simon/Documents/rust-analyzer/target/release/rust-analyzer analysis-stats .' '/home/simon/Documents/rust-analyzer-base/target/release/rust-analyzer analysis-stats .'
Benchmark #1: /home/simon/Documents/rust-analyzer/target/release/rust-analyzer analysis-stats .
Time (mean ± σ): 49.621 s ± 0.317 s [User: 48.725 s, System: 0.792 s]
Range (min … max): 49.397 s … 49.846 s 2 runs
Benchmark #2: /home/simon/Documents/rust-analyzer-base/target/release/rust-analyzer analysis-stats .
Time (mean ± σ): 51.764 s ± 0.045 s [User: 50.882 s, System: 0.756 s]
Range (min … max): 51.733 s … 51.796 s 2 runs
Summary
'/home/simon/Documents/rust-analyzer/target/release/rust-analyzer analysis-stats .' ran
1.04 ± 0.01 times faster than '/home/simon/Documents/rust-analyzer-base/target/release/rust-analyzer analysis-stats .'
Co-authored-by: Simon Vandel Sillesen <simon.vandel@gmail.com>
bors[bot] [Sat, 16 May 2020 09:50:19 +0000 (09:50 +0000)]
Merge #4479
4479: Chalk upgrade r=matklad a=flodiebold
This includes the fix for `dyn Trait` super traits, but I noticed that still a lot of `db.super_trait_method()` calls don't work because the super trait isn't in scope (because it doesn't actually need to be). Somehow, I thought we handled that already, but I'll fix it in a separate PR. Also I'll see what happens if we use more of Chalk's new built-in types and traits in a separate PR.
bors[bot] [Sat, 16 May 2020 02:15:44 +0000 (02:15 +0000)]
Merge #4288
4288: Add rename self to parameter and back. r=zbsz a=zbsz
This is a first stab at #3439
I liked the idea to do this as a rename instead of separate assist, so I tried implementing that.
It mostly works, but I'm sure there are some cases that I missed, especially in regards to parameter type.
Note: I'm playing with this this as a way to learn Rust and this project. So I'm sure it could be cleaner and put in better places`. Any suggestions?
bors[bot] [Fri, 15 May 2020 14:29:01 +0000 (14:29 +0000)]
Merge #4448
4448: Generate configuration for launch.json r=vsrs a=vsrs
This PR adds two new commands: `"rust-analyzer.debug"` and `"rust-analyzer.newDebugConfig"`. The former is a supplement to the existing `"rust-analyzer.run"` command and works the same way: asks for a runnable and starts new debug session. The latter allows adding a new configuration to **launch.json** (or to update an existing one).
If the new option `"rust-analyzer.debug.useLaunchJson"` is set to true then `"rust-analyzer.debug"` and Debug Lens will first look for existing debug configuration in **launch.json**. That is, it has become possible to specify startup arguments, env variables, etc.
`"rust-analyzer.debug.useLaunchJson"` is false by default, but it might be worth making true the default value. Personally I prefer true, but I'm not sure if it is good for all value.
----
I think that this PR also solves https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/3441.
Both methods to update launch.json mentioned in the issue do not work:
1. Menu. It is only possible to add a launch.json configuration template via a debug adapter. And anyway it's only a template and it is impossible to specify arguments from an extension.
2. DebugConfigurationProvider. The exact opposite situation: it is possible to specify all debug session settings, but it is impossible to export these settings to launch.json.
Separate `"rust-analyzer.newDebugConfig"` command looks better for me.
bors[bot] [Thu, 14 May 2020 14:29:22 +0000 (14:29 +0000)]
Merge #4273
4273: Trigger add_vis assist on paths/record fields as well r=flodiebold a=TimoFreiberg
Resolves #4037.
- [x] Function defs
- [x] ADT defs
- [x] Enum variants
- [x] Consts
- [x] Statics
- [x] Traits
- [x] Type aliases
- [x] Modules
- [x] Record fields (using different implementation)
- [x] struct fields
- [x] enum variant fields
- :x: union fields (`Semantics::resolve_record_field` seems to not work for union fields, so I think this can be handled in a future PR)
- [x] More tests?
- [x] Improve test fixture code and documentation a bit (see [Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/185405-t-compiler.2Fwg-rls-2.2E0/topic/resolve_path.20between.20fixture.20files))
Co-authored-by: Timo Freiberg <timo.freiberg@gmail.com>
bors[bot] [Thu, 14 May 2020 11:20:42 +0000 (11:20 +0000)]
Merge #4445
4445: Correctly fill default type parameters r=flodiebold a=montekki
Fixes #3877
So, basically even if the parameters are omitted from the `impl` block, check the parameters in `trait` if they have a default type, and if they do go from `hir` to `ast::TypeArg`. I've added a helper for that but I am not sure that it's a proper way to go from `hir` to `ast` here.
bors[bot] [Thu, 14 May 2020 09:23:34 +0000 (09:23 +0000)]
Merge #4405
4405: Make some stuff public so that they can be reused by other tools r=pksunkara a=pksunkara
So, my little experiment of building a code analysis tool using rust-analyzer is successful. I am going to proceed to build the tool now. This PR makes the needed things public.
I know there were some things about trying to change stuff regarding loading workspaces, which would make it more easier for other tools to reuse. But, until then, it should be okay using this `load_cargo` fn.
Btw, if I were publish my tool, I would need the `ra` crates to be released. Since @matklad told me that he doesn't want to care about breaking stuff, I would propose the following.
Every monday, during the weekly release, we release a new pre v1 minor version of all the crates. That way, we don't need to care about breaking stuff but still have rust-analyzer on crates.io.
I made https://github.com/pksunkara/cargo-workspaces to help release workspace crates easily.
So, coming week, we start with `0.1.0`, then week after that, we release `0.2.0` and then `0.3.0` etc.. until we decide on `1.0.0` which is probably when the compiler team also starts using the crates. There is no limit to the minor versions (we can even have `0.150.0` or `0.1500.0`), so I don't see anything wrong with this strategy.