8595: Diagnostic paths support specifying `remapPrefix` r=rickvanprim a=rickvanprim
Currently VSCode Problem Matchers will resolve a path like `//foo_crate/src/main.rs` if `${workspaceFolder}/foo_crate/src/main.rs` exists. Presumably their behavior is functionally a string concatenation that would produce `${workspaceFolder///foo_crate/src/main.rs` and repeated path separators get ignored.
This PR attempts to mimic this behavior by stripping any `Component::RootDir` from `file_name` before joining it to `workspace_root`, and then checking if the file exists. If it does, this path is used, and if not, the behavior falls through to the existing Rust path join behavior.
Co-authored-by: James Leitch <rickvanprim@gmail.com>
8570: Flycheck tries to parse both Cargo and Rustc messages. r=rickvanprim a=rickvanprim
This change allows non-Cargo build systems to be used for Flycheck provided they call `rustc` with `--error-format=json` and emit those JSON messages to `stdout`.
Co-authored-by: James Leitch <rickvanprim@gmail.com>
reading both stdout & stderr is a common gotcha, you need to drain them
concurrently to avoid deadlocks. Not sure why I didn't do the right
thing from the start. Seems like I assumed the stderr is short? That's
not the case when cargo spams `compiling xyz` messages
* don't feel obliged to quickly review every PR assigned to you
* so that other folks can notify you about interesting PRs without
thinking to much about creating additional work for you
8524: Fix extract function with partial block selection r=matklad a=brandondong
**Reproduction:**
```rust
fn foo() {
let n = 1;
let mut v = $0n * n;$0
v += 1;
}
```
1. Select the snippet ($0) and use the "Extract into function" assist.
2. Extracted function is incorrect and does not compile:
```rust
fn foo() {
let n = 1;
let mut v = fun_name(n);
v += 1;
}
fn fun_name(n: i32) {}
```
3. Omitting the ending semicolon from the selection fixes the extracted function:
```rust
fn fun_name(n: i32) -> i32 {
n * n
}
```
**Cause:**
- When `extraction_target` uses a block extraction (semicolon case) instead of an expression extraction (no semicolon case), the user selection is directly used as the TextRange.
- However, the existing function extraction logic for blocks requires that the TextRange spans from start to end of complete statements to work correctly.
- For example:
```rust
fn foo() {
let m = 2;
let n = 1;
let mut v = m $0* n;
let mut w = 3;$0
v += 1;
w += 1;
}
```
produces
```rust
fn foo() {
let m = 2;
let n = 1;
let mut v = m let mut w = fun_name(n);
v += 1;
w += 1;
}
fn fun_name(n: i32) -> i32 {
let mut w = 3;
w
}
```
- The user selected TextRange is directly replaced by the function call which is now in the middle of another statement. The extracted function body only contains statements that were fully covered by the TextRange and so the `* n` code is deleted. The logic for calculating variable usage and outlived variables for the function parameters and return type respectively search within the TextRange and so do not include `m` or `v`.
**Fix:**
- Only extract full statements when using block extraction. If a user selected part of a statement, extract that full statement.
8527: Switch introduce_named_lifetime assist to use mutable syntax tree r=matklad a=iDawer
This extends `GenericParamsOwnerEdit` trait with `get_or_create_generic_param_list` method
* don't feel obliged to quickly review every PR assigned to you
* so that other folks can notify you about interesting PRs without
thinking to much about creating additional work for you
8540: Prevent being able to rename items that are not part of the workspace r=Veykril a=Veykril
This change causes renames that happen on items coming from crates outside the workspace to fail. I believe this should be the right approach, but usage of cargo's workspace might not be entirely correct for preventing these kinds of refactoring from touching things they shouldn't. I'm not entirely sure?
cc #6623, this is one of the bigger footguns when it comes to refactoring, especially in combination with import aliases people tend to rename items coming from a crates dependency which this prevents.
I have a few Q's:
- [x] Should I write more tests, if so, what precisely should I test for?
- [x] I have an inline question on line 65, can someone provide guidance? :)
- [x] I can implement this for `ast::TupleField` too. But should it be a separate assist fn, or should I try and jam both into the `generate_deref`?
- [x] I want to follow this up with an assist on `impl $0Deref for T {` which would automatically generate a `DerefMut` impl that mirrors the Deref as well, however, I could probably use some pointers on how to do that, since I'll have to reach into the ast of `fn deref` to grab the field that it's referencing for the `DerefMut` impl.
8569: Support inherent impls in unnamed consts r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
It turns out that some proc. macros not only generate *trait* impls wrapped in `const _: () = { ... };`, but inherent impls too. Even though it is questionable whether *custom derives* should produce non-trait impls, this is useful for procedural attribute macros once we support them.
bors r+
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
8560: Escape characters in doc comments in macros correctly r=jonas-schievink a=ChayimFriedman2
Previously they were escaped twice, both by `.escape_default()` and the debug view of strings (`{:?}`). This leads to things like newlines or tabs in documentation comments being `\\n`, but we unescape literals only once, ending up with `\n`.
This was hard to spot because CMark unescaped them (at least for `'` and `"`), but it did not do so in code blocks.
This also was the root cause of #7781. This issue was solved by using `.escape_debug()` instead of `.escape_default()`, but the real issue remained.
We can bring the `.escape_default()` back by now, however I didn't do it because it is probably slower than `.escape_debug()` (more work to do), and also in order to change the code the least.
Example (the keyword and primitive docs are `include!()`d at https://doc.rust-lang.org/src/std/lib.rs.html#570-578, and thus originate from macro):
Escape characters in doc comments in macros correctly
Previously they were escaped twice, both by `.escape_default()` and the debug view of strings (`{:?}`). This leads to things like newlines or tabs in documentation comments being `\\n`, but we unescape literals only once, ending up with `\n`.
This was hard to spot because CMark unescaped them (at least for `'` and `"`), but it did not do so in code blocks.
This also was the root cause of #7781. This issue was solved by using `.escape_debug()` instead of `.escape_default()`, but the real issue remained.
We can bring the `.escape_default()` back by now, however I didn't do it because it is probably slower than `.escape_debug()` (more work to do), and also in order to change the code the least.
8557: Add an error message to fixture errors r=Veykril a=yoshuawuyts
Improve the error message when folks forget to add an `$0` in one of the fixtures. Figuring this one out was 20 minutes down the drain for me, so figured I might as well make sure nobody else has to go through the same thing in the future. Thanks!
projects / rust.git / log