Auto merge of #54278 - eddyb:spanned-generic-predicates, r=nikomatsakis
rustc: keep a Span for each predicate in ty::GenericPredicates.
This should allow finer-grained diagnostics, including migration suggestions for #54090.
(Note that I haven't changed most of the users of `predicates_of` to use the new spans)
Auto merge of #53013 - zackmdavis:infer_outlints, r=nikomatsakis
in which inferable outlives-requirements are linted
RFC 2093 (tracking issue #44493) lets us leave off these
commonsensically inferable `T: 'a` outlives requirements. (A separate
feature-gate was split off for the case of 'static lifetimes, for
which questions still remain.) Detecting these was requested as an
idioms-2018 lint.
Resolves #52042, an item under the fabulous metaïssue #52047.
It's plausible that this shouldn't land until after `infer_outlives_requirements` has been stabilized ([final comment period started](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44493#issuecomment-408852946) 4 days ago), but I think there's also a strong case to not-wait in order to maximize the time that [Edition Preview 2](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/rust-2018-release-schedule-and-extended-beta/8076) users have to kick at it. (It's allow by default, so there's no impact unless you explicitly turn it or the rust-2018-idioms group up to `warn` or higher.)
Questions—
* Is `explicit-outlives-requirements` a good name? (I chose it as an [RFC 344](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/0344-conventions-galore.md#lints)-compliant "inversion" of the feature-gate name, `infer_outlives_requirements`, but I could imagine someone arguing that the word `struct` should be part of the name somewhere, for specificity.)
* Are there any false-positives or false-negatives? @nikomatsakis [said that](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/52042#issuecomment-406409795) getting this right would be "fairly hard", which makes me nervous that I'm missing something. The UI test in the initial submission of this pull request just exercises the examples [given in the Edition Guide](https://rust-lang-nursery.github.io/edition-guide/2018/transitioning/ownership-and-lifetimes/struct-inference.html).
Fixes toolstate regression caused by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/54356.
The `save::process_crate` now needs to be passed an additional `&Input`, this change contains the RLS equivalent of [this](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/54356/files#diff-707a0eda6b2f1a0537abc3d23133748cR983).
Auto merge of #54356 - Xanewok:save-analysis-invocation, r=nrc
Emit used rustc invocation in the save-analysis file
Blocked on https://github.com/nrc/rls-data/pull/19. (I'm guessing it won't pass CI due to an out-of-tree git dependency)
This should allow RLS to recreate a Rust compilation build plan from the save-analysis files alone, which should be useful when fetching those from external build systems, most notably Buck now.
Also this includes some more potentially useful compilation-specific options (e.g. sysroot or the actual path to extern crates) but that's not required for the build plan bits.
Auto merge of #54568 - levex:issue-54130, r=nagisa
codegen_llvm: check inline assembly constraints with LLVM
---%<---
Hey all,
As issue #54130 highlights, constraints are not checked and passing bad constraints to LLVM can crash it since a `Verify()` call is placed inside an assertion (see: `src/llvm/lib/IR/InlineAsm.cpp:39`).
As this is my first PR to the Rust compiler (woot! :tada:), there might be better ways of achieving this result. In particular, I am not too happy about generating an error in codegen; it would be much nicer if we did it earlier. However, @rkruppe [noted on IRC](https://botbot.me/mozilla/rustc/2018-09-25/?msg=104791581&page=1) that this should be fine for an unstable feature and a much better solution than the _status quo_, which is an ICE.
Thanks!
--->%---
LLVM provides a way of checking whether the constraints and the actual
inline assembly make sense. This commit introduces a check before
emitting code for the inline assembly. If LLVM rejects the inline
assembly (or its constraints), then the compiler emits an error E0668
("malformed inline assembly").
Auto merge of #54338 - orium:fix-macro-inc-comp, r=nrc
Use full name to identify a macro in a `FileName`.
Before this two macros with same name would be indistinguishable inside a `FileName`. This caused a bug in incremental compilation (see #53097) since two different macros would map out to the same `StableFilemapId`.
Zack M. Davis [Sun, 26 Aug 2018 19:22:04 +0000 (12:22 -0700)]
in which inferable outlives-requirements are linted
RFC 2093 (tracking issue #44493) lets us leave off
commonsensically inferable `T: 'a` outlives requirements. (A separate
feature-gate was split off for the case of 'static lifetimes, for
which questions still remain.) Detecting these was requested as an
idioms-2018 lint.
It turns out that issuing a correct, autofixable suggestion here is
somewhat subtle in the presence of other bounds and generic
parameters. Basically, we want to handle these three cases:
• One outlives-bound. We want to drop the bound altogether, including
the colon—
MyStruct<'a, T: 'a>
^^^^ help: remove this bound
• An outlives bound first, followed by a trait bound. We want to
delete the outlives bound and the following plus sign (and
hopefully get the whitespace right, too)—
MyStruct<'a, T: 'a + MyTrait>
^^^^^ help: remove this bound
• An outlives bound after a trait bound. We want to delete the
outlives lifetime and the preceding plus sign—
MyStruct<'a, T: MyTrait + 'a>
^^^^^ help: remove this bound
This gets (slightly) even more complicated in the case of where
clauses, where we want to drop the where clause altogether if there's
just the one bound. Hopefully the comments are enough to explain
what's going on!
A script (in Python, sorry) was used to generate the
hopefully-sufficiently-exhaustive UI test input. Some of these are
split off into a different file because rust-lang-nursery/rustfix#141
(and, causally upstream of that, #53934) prevents them from being
`run-rustfix`-tested.
We also make sure to include a UI test of a case (copied from RFC
2093) where the outlives-bound can't be inferred. Special thanks to
Niko Matsakis for pointing out the `inferred_outlives_of` query,
rather than blindly stripping outlives requirements as if we weren't a
production compiler and didn't care.
Igor Matuszewski [Sat, 22 Sep 2018 20:24:32 +0000 (22:24 +0200)]
Move `filename_for_metadata` to codegen_utils
This function isn't strictly tied to LLVM (it's more of a utility) and
it's now near an analogous, almost identical `filename_for_input` (for
rlibs and so forth).
Also this means not depending on the backend when one wants to know the
accurate .rmeta output filename.
Auto merge of #54468 - matthewjasper:fix-polonius, r=nikomatsakis
[NLL] Get Polonius borrow check to work in simple cases
* Restores the generation of outlives facts from subtyping.
* Restore liveness facts.
* Generate invalidates facts at the start point of each location,
where we check for errors.
* Add a small test for simple cases (previously these cases have compiled, and more recently ICEd).
Closes #54212
cc #53142 (will need test)
### Known limitations
* Two phase borrows aren't implemented for Polonius yet
* Invalidation facts haven't been updated for some of the recent changes to make `Drop` terminators access fewer things.
* Fact generation is not as optimized as it could be.
* Around 30 tests fail in compare mode, often tests that are ignored in nll compare mode
Auto merge of #54533 - ljedrz:cleanup_librustc_typeck_check, r=davidtwco
A few cleanups and minor improvements to typeck/check
- turn a `loop` into a `while let`
- turn a `push_back` loop into an `extend`
- turn a few `push` loops into collected iterators
- prefer `vec![x; n]` to `(0..n).map(|_| x).collect()`
- combine two loops doing the same thing on 2 data sets using `chain`
- use `unwrap_or` where applicable and readable
- add a `potentially_plural_count` helper function to simplify several `format!()` calls
- prefer `to_owned` to `to_string` for string literals
- change `match` to `if let` where only one branch matters
- a few other minor improvements
- whitespace fixes
Auto merge of #52319 - tinco:issue_12590, r=pnkfelix
Track whether module declarations are inline (fixes #12590)
To track whether module declarations are inline I added a field `inline: bool` to `ast::Mod`. The main use case is for pretty to know whether it should render the items associated with the module, but perhaps there are use cases for this information to not be forgotten in the AST.
Matthew Jasper [Wed, 26 Sep 2018 19:41:14 +0000 (20:41 +0100)]
Get Polonius borrow check to work in simple cases
* Restores the generation of outlives facts from subtyping.
* Restore liveness facts.
* Generate invalidates facts at the start point of each location,
where we check for errors.
* Add a small test for simple cases.
Auto merge of #54453 - nikomatsakis:nll-issue-53121-shred-outlives, r=pnkfelix
rework how we handle outlives relationships
When we encounter an outlives relationship involving a projection, we use to over-constrain in some cases with region constraints. We also used to evaluate whether the where-clauses in the environment might apply **before** running inference.
We now avoid doing both of those things:
- If there are where-clauses in the environment that might be useful, we add no constraints.
- After inference is done, we check if we wound up inferring values compatible with the where-clause, and make use of them if so.
I realize now that this PR includes some meandering commits and refactorings from when I expected to go in a different direction. If desired, I could try to remove some of those.
Auto merge of #51946 - japaric:emit-stack-sizes, r=nikomatsakis
[eRFC] add -Z emit-stack-sizes
# What
This PR exposes LLVM's ability to report the stack usage of each function through the unstable /
experimental `-Z emit-stack-sizes` flag.
# Motivation
The end goal is to enable whole program analysis of stack usage to prove absence of stack overflows
at compile time. Such property is important in systems that lack a MMU / MPU and where stack
overflows can corrupt memory. And in systems that have protection against stack overflows such proof
can be used to opt out of runtime checks (e.g. stack probes or the MPU).
Such analysis requires the call graph of the program, which can be obtained from MIR, and the stack
usage of each function in the program. Precise information about the later later can only be
obtained from LLVM as it depends on the optimization level and optimization options like LTO.
This PR does **not** attempt to add the ability to perform such whole program analysis to rustc;
it simply does the minimal amount of work to enable such analysis to be implemented out of tree.
# Implementation
This PR exposes a way to set LLVM's `EmitStackSizeSection` option from the command line. The option
is documented [here]; the documentation is copied below for convenience and posteriority:
> A section containing metadata on function stack sizes will be emitted when
> TargetLoweringObjectFile::StackSizesSection is not null, and TargetOptions::EmitStackSizeSection
> is set (-stack-size-section). The section will contain an array of pairs of function symbol values
> (pointer size) and stack sizes (unsigned LEB128). The stack size values only include the space
> allocated in the function prologue. Functions with dynamic stack allocations are not included.
Where the LLVM feature is not available (e.g. LLVM version < 6.0) or can't be applied (e.g. the
output format doesn't support sections e.g. .wasm files) the flag does nothing -- i.e. no error or
warning is emitted.
#[inline(never)]
fn stack() {
unsafe {
// array allocated on the stack
let array: [i32; 4] = mem::uninitialized();
for elem in &array {
ptr::read_volatile(&elem);
}
}
}
EOF
$ # we need a custom linking step to preserve the .stack_sizes section
$ # (see unresolved questions for a solution that doesn't require custom linking)
$ cat > keep-stack-sizes.x <<'EOF'
SECTIONS
{
.stack_sizes :
{
KEEP(*(.stack_sizes));
}
}
EOF
Like `-Z sanitize` this is a re-export of an LLVM feature. To me knowledge, we don't have a policy
about stabilization of such features as they are incompatible with, or demand extra implementation
effort from, alternative backends (e.g. cranelift). As such this feature will remain experimental /
unstable for the foreseeable future.
# Unresolved questions
## Section name
Should we rename the `.stack_sizes` section to `.debug_stacksizes`?
With the former name linkers will strip the section unless told otherwise using a linker script,
which means getting this information requires both knowledge about linker scripts and a custom
linker invocation (see example above).
If we use the `.debug_stacksizes` name (I believe) linkers will always keep the section, which means
`-Z emit-stack-sizes` is the only thing required to get the stack usage information.
# ~TODOs~
~Investigate why this doesn't work with the `thumb` targets. I get the LLVM error shown below:~
``` console
$ cargo new --lib foo && cd $_
$ echo '#![no_std] pub fn foo() {}' > src/lib.rs
$ cargo rustc --target thumbv7m-none-eabi -- -Z emit-stack-sizes
LLVM ERROR: unsupported relocation on symbol
```
~which sounds like it might be related to the `relocation-model` option. Maybe `relocation-model =
static` is not supported for some reason?~
This fixed itself after the LLVM upgrade.
---
r? @nikomatsakis
cc @rust-lang/compiler @perlindgren @whitequark
Niko Matsakis [Mon, 17 Sep 2018 18:00:33 +0000 (14:00 -0400)]
use approx. bounds to decide whether to add outlives obligations
Before, if we had a projection like `<T as Foo<'0>>::Bar: 'x` and a
where clause like `<T as Foo<'a>>::Bar: 'a`, we considered those to
have nothing to do with one another. Therefore, we would use the
"overconstrained" path of adding `T: 'x` and `'0: 'x` requirements. We
now do a "fuzzy" match where we erase regions first and hence we see
the env bound `'a`.
Niko Matsakis [Wed, 12 Sep 2018 21:48:51 +0000 (17:48 -0400)]
apply `process_registered_region_obligations` at the end of regionck
We used to apply it repeatedly as we went, relying on the current
value of the `region_bound_pairs_accum` vector. But now we save those
values into a map, so we can just process all the registered region
obligations at the end.
Auto merge of #54199 - nikomatsakis:predicate_may_hold-failure, r=eddyb
overlook overflows in rustdoc trait solving
Context:
The new rustdoc "auto trait" feature walks across impls and tries to run trait solving on them with a lot of unconstrained variables. This is prone to overflows. These overflows used to cause an ICE because of a caching bug (fixed in this PR). But even once that is fixed, it means that rustdoc causes an overflow rather than generating docs.
This PR therefore adds a new helper that propagates the overflow error out. This requires rustdoc to then decide what to do when it encounters such an overflow: technically, an overflow represents neither "yes" nor "no", but rather a failure to make a decision. I've decided to opt on the side of treating this as "yes, implemented", since rustdoc already takes an optimistic view. This may prove to include too many items, but I *suspect* not.
We could probably reduce the rate of overflows by unifying more of the parameters from the impl -- right now we only seem to consider the self type. Moreover, in the future, as we transition to Chalk, overflow errors are expected to just "go away" (in some cases, though, queries might return an ambiguous result).
Fixes #52873
cc @QuietMisdreavus -- this is the stuff we were talking about earlier
cc @GuillaumeGomez -- this supersedes #53687
Auto merge of #53824 - ljedrz:begone_onevector, r=michaelwoerister
Remove OneVector, increase related SmallVec capacities
Removes the `OneVector` type alias (equivalent to `SmallVec<[T; 1]>`); it is used in scenarios where the capacity of 1 is often exceeded, which might be nullifying the performance wins (due to spilling to the heap) expected when using `SmallVec` instead of `Vec`.
The numbers I used in this PR are very rough estimates - it would probably be a good idea to adjust some/all of them, which is what this proposal is all about.
It might be a good idea to additionally create some local type aliases for the `SmallVec`s in the `Folder` trait, as they are repeated in quite a few spots; I'd be happy to apply this sort of adjustments.
Auto merge of #54575 - pietroalbini:rollup, r=pietroalbini
Rollup of 12 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #53518 (Add doc for impl From in char_convert)
- #54058 (Introduce the partition_dedup/by/by_key methods for slices)
- #54281 (Search box)
- #54368 (Reduce code block sides padding)
- #54498 (The project moved under the Mozilla umbrella)
- #54518 (resolve: Do not block derive helper resolutions on single import resolutions)
- #54522 (Fixed three small typos.)
- #54529 (aarch64-pc-windows-msvc: Don't link libpanic_unwind to libtest.)
- #54537 (Rename slice::exact_chunks() to slice::chunks_exact())
- #54539 (Fix js error)
- #54557 (incr.comp.: Don't automatically enable -Zshare-generics for incr. comp. builds.)
- #54558 (Improvements to finding LLVM's FileCheck)
Pietro Albini [Tue, 25 Sep 2018 20:34:51 +0000 (22:34 +0200)]
Rollup merge of #54558 - tromey:find-filecheck, r=nikomatsakis
Improvements to finding LLVM's FileCheck
This patch adds a few improvements to how the build system finds
LLVM's FileCheck program.
* On Fedora, the system LLVM installs FileCheck in the "llvm"
subdirectory of the LLVM libdir. This patch teaches the build
system to look there.
* This adds a configure option to specify which llvm-config executable
to use. This is handy on systems that can parallel install multiple
versions of LLVM; for example I can now:
./configure --llvm-config=/bin/llvm-config-5.0-64
... to build against LLVM 5, rather than whatever the default
llvm-config might be.
* Finally, this adds a configure- and config.toml- option to set the
path to FileCheck. This is handy when building against an LLVM
where FileCheck was not installed. This happens on compatibility
installs of LLVM on Fedora.
Pietro Albini [Tue, 25 Sep 2018 20:34:50 +0000 (22:34 +0200)]
Rollup merge of #54557 - michaelwoerister:dont-auto-share-generics-for-incr-comp, r=alexcrichton
incr.comp.: Don't automatically enable -Zshare-generics for incr. comp. builds.
So far the compiler would automatically enable sharing of monomorphizations for incremental builds. That was OK because without (Thin)LTO this could have very little impact on the runtime performance of the generated code. However, since https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/53673, ThinLTO and incr. comp. can be combined, so the trade-off is not as clear anymore.
This PR removes the automatic tie between the two options. Whether monomorphizations are shared between crates or not now _only_ depends on the optimization level.
Pietro Albini [Tue, 25 Sep 2018 20:34:46 +0000 (22:34 +0200)]
Rollup merge of #54529 - michaelwoerister:dont-unwind-test, r=alexcrichton
aarch64-pc-windows-msvc: Don't link libpanic_unwind to libtest.
This implements the suggestion from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/54190#issuecomment-422904437 in order to unbreak bootstrapping for the `aarch64-pc-windows-msvc` target. With this applied and using MSVC 15.8.3 for linking the bootstrap actually works and I can cross-compile a hello-world program.
projects / rust.git / log