Rollup merge of #35574 - badboy:emscripten-test-fixes, r=brson
Emscripten test fixes
This picks up parts of #31623 to disable certain tests that emscripten can't run, as threads/processes are not supported.
I re-applied @tomaka's changes manually, I can rebase those commits with his credentials if he wants.
It also disables jemalloc for emscripten (at least in Rustbuild, I have to check if there is another setting for the same thing in the old makefile approach).
This should not impact anything for normal builds.
Question: How can I only underline the function name ? I have observed the debug output and the struct of item, but I can't find the `Span` for function name. Should I modify the struct I get to save function name's position or there is another way to get it ? (I can only find `Span`s for function attributes, inputs, outputs, blocks)
Rollup merge of #35539 - cgswords:ts_concat, r=nrc
Implemented a smarter TokenStream concatenation system
The new algorithm performs 'aggressive compacting' during concatenation as follows:
- If the nodes' combined total total length is less than 32, we copy both of
them into a new vector and build a new leaf node.
- If one node is an internal node and the other is a 'small' leaf (length<32),
we recur down the internal node on the appropriate side.
- Otherwise, we construct a new internal node that points to them as left and
right.
This should produce notably better behavior than the current concatenation implementation.
Rollup merge of #35444 - alexcrichton:optimize-catch-unwind, r=brson
std: Optimize panic::catch_unwind slightly
The previous implementation of this function was overly conservative with
liberal usage of `Option` and `.unwrap()` which in theory never triggers. This
commit essentially removes the `Option`s in favor of unsafe implementations,
improving the code generation of the fast path for LLVM to see through what's
happening more clearly.
Rollup merge of #35392 - malbarbo:cell-from, r=brson
Implement From for Cell, RefCell and UnsafeCell
Considering that `From` is implemented for `Box`, `Rc` and `Arc`, it seems [reasonable](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/implementing-from-t-for-other-std-types/3744) to implement it for `Cell`, `RefCell` and `UnsafeCell`.
bors [Sun, 14 Aug 2016 06:37:11 +0000 (23:37 -0700)]
Auto merge of #35453 - jseyfried:hygienize_metavariables, r=nrc
macros: Make metavariables hygienic
This PR makes metavariables hygienic. For example, consider:
```rust
macro_rules! foo {
($x:tt) => { // Suppose that this token tree argument is always a metavariable.
macro_rules! bar { ($x:expr, $y:expr) => { ($x, $y) } }
}
}
fn main() {
foo!($z); // This currently compiles.
foo!($y); // This is an error today but compiles after this PR.
}
```
Today, the `macro_rules! bar { ... }` definition is only valid when the metavariable passed to `foo` is not `$y` (since it unhygienically conflicts with the `$y` in the definition of `bar`) or `$x` (c.f. #35450).
After this PR, the definition of `bar` is always valid (and `bar!(a, b)` always expands to `(a, b)` as expected).
This can break code that was allowed in #34925 (landed two weeks ago). For example,
```rust
macro_rules! outer {
($t:tt) => {
macro_rules! inner { ($i:item) => { $t } }
}
}
outer!($i); // This `$i` should not interact with the `$i` in the definition of `inner!`.
inner!(fn main() {}); // After this PR, this is an error ("unknown macro variable `i`").
```
Due to the severe limitations on nested `macro_rules!` before #34925, this is not a breaking change for stable/beta.
bors [Sat, 13 Aug 2016 16:52:49 +0000 (09:52 -0700)]
Auto merge of #35414 - jupp0r:feature/test-threads-flag, r=alexcrichton
Add --test-threads option to test binaries
This change allows parallelism of test runs to be specified by a
command line flag names --test-threads in addition to the existing
environment variable RUST_TEST_THREADS. Fixes #25636.
bors [Fri, 12 Aug 2016 08:26:12 +0000 (01:26 -0700)]
Auto merge of #35091 - eddyb:impl-trait, r=nikomatsakis
Implement `impl Trait` in return type position by anonymization.
This is the first step towards implementing `impl Trait` (cc #34511).
`impl Trait` types are only allowed in function and inherent method return types, and capture all named lifetime and type parameters, being invariant over them.
No lifetimes that are not explicitly named lifetime parameters are allowed to escape from the function body.
The exposed traits are only those listed explicitly, i.e. `Foo` and `Clone` in `impl Foo + Clone`, with the exception of "auto traits" (like `Send` or `Sync`) which "leak" the actual contents.
// is represented as:
type A</*invariant over*/ T> where A<T>: Iterator<Item=B<T>>;
type B</*invariant over*/ T> where B<T>: FnOnce() -> T;
fn foo<T>(xs: Vec<T>) -> A<T> {
xs.into_iter().map(|x| || x): $0 where $0: Iterator<Item=$1>, $1: FnOnce() -> T
}
```
`$0` and `$1` are resolved (to `iter::Map<vec::Iter<T>, closure>` and the closure, respectively) and assigned to `A` and `B`, after checking the body of `foo`. `A` and `B` are *never* resolved for user-facing type equality (typeck), but always for the low-level representation and specialization (trans).
The "auto traits" exception is implemented by collecting bounds like `impl Trait: Send` that have failed for the obscure `impl Trait` type (i.e. `A` or `B` above), pretending they succeeded within the function and trying them again after type-checking the whole crate, by replacing `impl Trait` with the real type.
While passing around values which have explicit lifetime parameters (of the function with `-> impl Trait`) in their type *should* work, regionck appears to assign inference variables in *way* too many cases, and never properly resolving them to either explicit lifetime parameters, or `'static`.
We might not be able to handle lifetime parameters in `impl Trait` without changes to lifetime inference, but type parameters can have arbitrary lifetimes in them from the caller, so most type-generic usecases (or not generic at all) should not run into this problem.
Alex Crichton [Sat, 9 Jul 2016 02:45:37 +0000 (19:45 -0700)]
std: Optimize panic::catch_unwind slightly
The previous implementation of this function was overly conservative with
liberal usage of `Option` and `.unwrap()` which in theory never triggers. This
commit essentially removes the `Option`s in favor of unsafe implementations,
improving the code generation of the fast path for LLVM to see through what's
happening more clearly.
Everyone in the issue discussion seemed to be in favor, @huonw also spoke about this [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/3xldr9/surfaces_and_signatures_component_privacy_versus/cy615wq), but the issue haven't got any movement.
I think it's reasonable to do this before turning `private_in_public` warnings into errors.
Jonathan Turner [Thu, 11 Aug 2016 13:34:02 +0000 (06:34 -0700)]
Rollup merge of #35576 - circuitfox:E0072-update-error-format, r=jonathandturner
E0072 update error format
Part of #35233
Fixes #35506
r? @jonathandturner
The bonus for this issue currently seems to be impossible to do reliably, as the compiler seems to lack span information for item names alone, like `Foo` in `struct Foo { ... }`. It would be possible to hack something together by computing span offsets, but that seems like a solution that would be begging for trouble.
A proper solution to this would, of course, be to add span information to the right place (seems to be `rustc::hir::Item::name` but I may be wrong).
Jonathan Turner [Thu, 11 Aug 2016 13:34:01 +0000 (06:34 -0700)]
Rollup merge of #35562 - birkenfeld:as-mut-doc, r=steveklabnik
Remove redundant `&mut ref mut` in doc for Result::as_mut()
While a good example of how `&mut ref mut` is a no-op, I don't think we should show that here :)
See https://users.rust-lang.org/t/mnemonic-for-reading-qualifiers/6853
Jonathan Turner [Thu, 11 Aug 2016 13:34:00 +0000 (06:34 -0700)]
Rollup merge of #35537 - munyari:e0038, r=jonathandturner
Update E0038 to the new error format
Part of #35233
Addresses #35500
"r? @jonathandturner
This doesn't compile yet, and I need help. In my naive solution, adding the span label makes our error message a mutable `errors::DiagnosticBuilder` pointer.
```
Building stage0 std artifacts (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Building stage0 test artifacts (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Building stage0 compiler artifacts (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Compiling rustc v0.0.0 (file:///home/nash/code/rust/src/librustc)
src/librustc/traits/error_reporting.rs:735:9: 735:12 error: mismatched types [E0308]
src/librustc/traits/error_reporting.rs:735 err
^~~
src/librustc/traits/error_reporting.rs:735:9: 735:12 help: run `rustc --explain E0308` to see a detailed explanation
src/librustc/traits/error_reporting.rs:735:9: 735:12 note: expected type `core::option::Option<errors::DiagnosticBuilder<'tcx>>`
src/librustc/traits/error_reporting.rs:735:9: 735:12 note: found type `core::option::Option<&mut errors::DiagnosticBuilder<'_>>`
error: aborting due to previous error
error: Could not compile `rustc`.
To learn more, run the command again with --verbose.
Jonathan Turner [Thu, 11 Aug 2016 13:33:59 +0000 (06:33 -0700)]
Rollup merge of #35528 - Vassah:master, r=jonathandturner
Update Error Format for E0091 and E0092
Addresses [#35228](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/35228) and [#35229](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/35229) as part of [#35233](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/35233).
Please let me know if there are any issues; first time contributor.
bors [Thu, 11 Aug 2016 12:04:41 +0000 (05:04 -0700)]
Auto merge of #35403 - scottcarr:lvalue_refactor, r=nikomatsakis
refactor lvalue_ty to be method of lvalue
Currently `Mir` (and `MirContext`) implement a method `lvalue_ty` (and actually many more `foo_ty`). But this should be a method of `Lvalue`.
If you have an `lvalue` and you want to get its type, the natural thing to write is:
```
lvalue.ty()
```
Of course it needs context, but still:
```
lvalue.ty(mir, tcx)
```
Makes more sense than
```
mir.lvalue_ty(lvalue, tcx)
```
I actually think we should go a step farther and have traits so we could get the type of some value generically, but that's up for debate. The thing I'm running into a lot in the compiler is I have a value of type `Foo` and I know that there is some related type `Bar` which I can get through some combination of method calls, but it's often not as direct as I would imagine. Unless you already know the code, its not clear why you would look in `Mir` for a method to get the type of an `Lvalue`.
bors [Thu, 11 Aug 2016 04:42:48 +0000 (21:42 -0700)]
Auto merge of #34845 - bitshifter:issue-30961, r=alexcrichton
Add help for target CPUs, features, relocation and code models.
Fix for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/30961. Requires PR https://github.com/rust-lang/llvm/pull/45 to be accepted first, and the .gitmodules for llvm to be updated before this can be merged.
bors [Wed, 10 Aug 2016 20:13:50 +0000 (13:13 -0700)]
Auto merge of #35489 - sanxiyn:target-list, r=alexcrichton
Print Rust target name, not LLVM target name, for `--print target-list`
Rust target name and LLVM target name are usually the same, but not always. For example, `arm-unknown-linux-musleabi` Rust target uses `arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi` LLVM target.
projects / rust.git / log