bors [Sat, 26 Feb 2022 22:17:04 +0000 (22:17 +0000)]
Auto merge of #1989 - saethlin:short-backtraces, r=RalfJung
Only print the pruning note if the trace was definitely pruned
Per https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/pull/1987#discussion_r815337994
The only problem with this is that it looks like we can't emit the note about `-Zmiri-backtrace=full` if we also emit a tag-tracking diagnostic. The final note about the setting simply doesn't appear on the final error if it is printed before. I feel like we're running up against some diagnostic deduplication logic?
bors [Sat, 26 Feb 2022 08:56:02 +0000 (08:56 +0000)]
Auto merge of #1987 - saethlin:short-backtraces, r=oli-obk
Prune stacktraces for tag-tracking diagnostics too
In https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/pull/1977 we forgot to use the pruning logic when printing tag-tracking messages. I just saw this output before this PR which is very silly:
```
test sanity ... note: tracking was triggered
--> src/lib.rs:110:21
|
110 | unsafe { &*(&self.value[range] as *const [T] as *const Aligned<A, [T]>) }
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ created tag 160954
|
= note: inside `<Aligned<A4, [u8]> as std::ops::Index<std::ops::RangeTo<usize>>>::index` at src/lib.rs:110:21
note: inside `sanity` at src/lib.rs:261:30
--> src/lib.rs:261:30
|
261 | let y: &Aligned<_, _> = &y[..2];
| ^^^^^^
note: inside closure at src/lib.rs:229:1
--> src/lib.rs:229:1
|
228 | #[test]
| ------- in this procedural macro expansion
229 | / fn sanity() {
230 | | use core::mem;
231 | |
232 | | let x: Aligned<A2, _> = Aligned([0u8; 3]);
... |
284 | | let _: &[u8] = y;
285 | | }
| |_^
= note: inside `<[closure@src/lib.rs:229:1: 285:2] as std::ops::FnOnce<()>>::call_once - shim` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:227:5
= note: inside `<fn() as std::ops::FnOnce<()>>::call_once - shim(fn())` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:227:5
= note: inside `test::__rust_begin_short_backtrace::<fn()>` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/test/src/lib.rs:575:5
= note: inside closure at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/test/src/lib.rs:566:30
= note: inside `<[closure@test::run_test::{closure#1}] as std::ops::FnOnce<()>>::call_once - shim(vtable)` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:227:5
= note: inside `<std::boxed::Box<dyn std::ops::FnOnce() + std::marker::Send> as std::ops::FnOnce<()>>::call_once` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/alloc/src/boxed.rs:1854:9
= note: inside `<std::panic::AssertUnwindSafe<std::boxed::Box<dyn std::ops::FnOnce() + std::marker::Send>> as std::ops::FnOnce<()>>::call_once` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/core/src/panic/unwind_safe.rs:271:9
= note: inside `std::panicking::r#try::do_call::<std::panic::AssertUnwindSafe<std::boxed::Box<dyn std::ops::FnOnce() + std::marker::Send>>, ()>` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/panicking.rs:492:40
= note: inside `std::panicking::r#try::<(), std::panic::AssertUnwindSafe<std::boxed::Box<dyn std::ops::FnOnce() + std::marker::Send>>>` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/panicking.rs:456:19
= note: inside `std::panic::catch_unwind::<std::panic::AssertUnwindSafe<std::boxed::Box<dyn std::ops::FnOnce() + std::marker::Send>>, ()>` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/panic.rs:137:14
= note: inside `test::run_test_in_process` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/test/src/lib.rs:598:18
= note: inside closure at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/test/src/lib.rs:492:39
= note: inside `test::run_test::run_test_inner` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/test/src/lib.rs:530:13
= note: inside `test::run_test` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/test/src/lib.rs:562:28
= note: inside `test::run_tests::<[closure@test::run_tests_console::{closure#2}]>` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/test/src/lib.rs:305:17
= note: inside `test::run_tests_console` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/test/src/console.rs:286:5
= note: inside `test::test_main` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/test/src/lib.rs:116:15
= note: inside `test::test_main_static` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/test/src/lib.rs:135:5
= note: inside `main`
= note: inside `<fn() as std::ops::FnOnce<()>>::call_once - shim(fn())` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:227:5
= note: inside `std::sys_common::backtrace::__rust_begin_short_backtrace::<fn(), ()>` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/sys_common/backtrace.rs:122:18
= note: inside closure at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/rt.rs:145:18
= note: inside `std::ops::function::impls::<impl std::ops::FnOnce<()> for &dyn std::ops::Fn() -> i32 + std::marker::Sync + std::panic::RefUnwindSafe>::call_once` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:259:13
= note: inside `std::panicking::r#try::do_call::<&dyn std::ops::Fn() -> i32 + std::marker::Sync + std::panic::RefUnwindSafe, i32>` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/panicking.rs:492:40
= note: inside `std::panicking::r#try::<i32, &dyn std::ops::Fn() -> i32 + std::marker::Sync + std::panic::RefUnwindSafe>` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/panicking.rs:456:19
= note: inside `std::panic::catch_unwind::<&dyn std::ops::Fn() -> i32 + std::marker::Sync + std::panic::RefUnwindSafe, i32>` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/panic.rs:137:14
= note: inside closure at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/rt.rs:128:48
= note: inside `std::panicking::r#try::do_call::<[closure@std::rt::lang_start_internal::{closure#2}], isize>` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/panicking.rs:492:40
= note: inside `std::panicking::r#try::<isize, [closure@std::rt::lang_start_internal::{closure#2}]>` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/panicking.rs:456:19
= note: inside `std::panic::catch_unwind::<[closure@std::rt::lang_start_internal::{closure#2}], isize>` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/panic.rs:137:14
= note: inside `std::rt::lang_start_internal` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/rt.rs:128:20
= note: inside `std::rt::lang_start::<()>` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/rt.rs:144:17
= note: this note originates in the attribute macro `test` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
error: Undefined Behavior: trying to reborrow for SharedReadOnly at alloc61593+0x2, but parent tag <160954> does not have an appropriate item in the borrow stack
--> src/lib.rs:261:30
|
261 | let y: &Aligned<_, _> = &y[..2];
| ^^^^^^ trying to reborrow for SharedReadOnly at alloc61593+0x2, but parent tag <160954> does not have an appropriate item in the borrow stack
|
= help: this indicates a potential bug in the program: it performed an invalid operation, but the rules it violated are still experimental
= help: see https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/blob/master/wip/stacked-borrows.md for further information
= note: inside `sanity` at src/lib.rs:261:30
note: inside closure at src/lib.rs:229:1
--> src/lib.rs:229:1
|
228 | #[test]
| ------- in this procedural macro expansion
229 | / fn sanity() {
230 | | use core::mem;
231 | |
232 | | let x: Aligned<A2, _> = Aligned([0u8; 3]);
... |
284 | | let _: &[u8] = y;
285 | | }
| |_^
= note: this error originates in the attribute macro `test` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
note: some details are omitted, run with `MIRIFLAGS=-Zmiri-backtrace=full` for a verbose backtrace
bors [Tue, 22 Feb 2022 15:39:07 +0000 (15:39 +0000)]
Auto merge of #1977 - saethlin:short-backtraces, r=RalfJung
Prune backtraces similar to RUST_BACKTRACE=1 logic
This removes the majority of output from `cargo miri run` and `cargo miri test` in common usage.
~~I've copied the logic almost directly from `std`:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/3b186511f62b0ce20e72ede0e8e13f8787155f02/library/std/src/sys_common/backtrace.rs#L76-L77~~
~~It might be nice to have the "some details were omitted" note and a fallback to a setting where we print everything just in case this logic goes sideways, but~~
~~1. I'm not sure where to put the note~~
~~2. `MIRI_BACKTRACE`, `RUST_BACKTRACE`, and `RUSTC_CTFE_BACKTRACE` already do something else. Should we repurpose or add on to the semantics of `MIRI_BACKTRACE`?~~
---
Based on this tiny silly crate:
```rust
fn main() {
some_function();
}
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
#[test]
fn it_works() {
unsafe {
let _x: &'static u8 = core::mem::transmute(1usize);
}
}
}
```
`cargo miri run`:
Before:
```
Finished dev [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.10s
Running `/home/ben/.cargo/bin/cargo-miri target/miri/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/debug/scratch`
error: Undefined Behavior: type validation failed: encountered a dangling reference (address 0x1 is unallocated)
--> src/main.rs:7:23
|
7 | let _x: &u8 = core::mem::transmute(1usize);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ type validation failed: encountered a dangling reference (address 0x1 is unallocated)
|
= help: this indicates a bug in the program: it performed an invalid operation, and caused Undefined Behavior
= help: see https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/reference/behavior-considered-undefined.html for further information
= note: inside `some_function` at src/main.rs:7:23
note: inside `main` at src/main.rs:2:5
--> src/main.rs:2:5
|
2 | some_function();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
= note: inside `<fn() as std::ops::FnOnce<()>>::call_once - shim(fn())` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:227:5
= note: inside `std::sys_common::backtrace::__rust_begin_short_backtrace::<fn(), ()>` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/sys_common/backtrace.rs:122:18
= note: inside closure at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/rt.rs:145:18
= note: inside `std::ops::function::impls::<impl std::ops::FnOnce<()> for &dyn std::ops::Fn() -> i32 + std::marker::Sync + std::panic::RefUnwindSafe>::call_once` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:259:13
= note: inside `std::panicking::r#try::do_call::<&dyn std::ops::Fn() -> i32 + std::marker::Sync + std::panic::RefUnwindSafe, i32>` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/panicking.rs:492:40
= note: inside `std::panicking::r#try::<i32, &dyn std::ops::Fn() -> i32 + std::marker::Sync + std::panic::RefUnwindSafe>` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/panicking.rs:456:19
= note: inside `std::panic::catch_unwind::<&dyn std::ops::Fn() -> i32 + std::marker::Sync + std::panic::RefUnwindSafe, i32>` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/panic.rs:137:14
= note: inside closure at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/rt.rs:128:48
= note: inside `std::panicking::r#try::do_call::<[closure@std::rt::lang_start_internal::{closure#2}], isize>` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/panicking.rs:492:40
= note: inside `std::panicking::r#try::<isize, [closure@std::rt::lang_start_internal::{closure#2}]>` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/panicking.rs:456:19
= note: inside `std::panic::catch_unwind::<[closure@std::rt::lang_start_internal::{closure#2}], isize>` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/panic.rs:137:14
= note: inside `std::rt::lang_start_internal` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/rt.rs:128:20
= note: inside `std::rt::lang_start::<()>` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/rt.rs:144:17
error: aborting due to previous error
```
After:
``` Finished dev [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.10s
Running `/home/ben/.cargo/bin/cargo-miri target/miri/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/debug/scratch`
error: Undefined Behavior: type validation failed: encountered a dangling reference (address 0x1 is unallocated)
--> src/main.rs:7:23
|
7 | let _x: &u8 = core::mem::transmute(1usize);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ type validation failed: encountered a dangling reference (address 0x1 is unallocated)
|
= help: this indicates a bug in the program: it performed an invalid operation, and caused Undefined Behavior
= help: see https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/reference/behavior-considered-undefined.html for further information
= note: inside `some_function` at src/main.rs:7:23
note: inside `main` at src/main.rs:2:5
--> src/main.rs:2:5
|
2 | some_function();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
note: Some details are omitted, run with `MIRIFLAGS=-Zmiri-backtrace=full` for a verbose backtrace.
error: aborting due to previous error
```
`cargo miri test`
Before:
```
Finished test [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.00s
Running unittests (target/miri/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/debug/deps/scratch-9d7717efc37bb64c)
running 1 test
test tests::it_works ... error: Undefined Behavior: type validation failed: encountered a dangling reference (address 0x1 is unallocated)
--> src/main.rs:16:35
|
16 | let _x: &'static u8 = core::mem::transmute(1usize);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ type validation failed: encountered a dangling reference (address 0x1 is unallocated)
|
= help: this indicates a bug in the program: it performed an invalid operation, and caused Undefined Behavior
= help: see https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/reference/behavior-considered-undefined.html for further information
= note: inside `tests::it_works` at src/main.rs:16:35
note: inside closure at src/main.rs:14:5
--> src/main.rs:14:5
|
13 | #[test]
| ------- in this procedural macro expansion
14 | / fn it_works() {
15 | | unsafe {
16 | | let _x: &'static u8 = core::mem::transmute(1usize);
17 | | }
18 | | }
| |_____^
= note: inside `<[closure@src/main.rs:14:5: 18:6] as std::ops::FnOnce<()>>::call_once - shim` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:227:5
= note: inside `<fn() as std::ops::FnOnce<()>>::call_once - shim(fn())` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:227:5
= note: inside `tests::test::__rust_begin_short_backtrace::<fn()>` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/test/src/lib.rs:575:5
= note: inside closure at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/test/src/lib.rs:566:30
= note: inside `<[closure@tests::test::run_test::{closure#1}] as std::ops::FnOnce<()>>::call_once - shim(vtable)` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:227:5
= note: inside `<std::boxed::Box<dyn std::ops::FnOnce() + std::marker::Send> as std::ops::FnOnce<()>>::call_once` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/alloc/src/boxed.rs:1854:9
= note: inside `<std::panic::AssertUnwindSafe<std::boxed::Box<dyn std::ops::FnOnce() + std::marker::Send>> as std::ops::FnOnce<()>>::call_once` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/core/src/panic/unwind_safe.rs:271:9
= note: inside `std::panicking::r#try::do_call::<std::panic::AssertUnwindSafe<std::boxed::Box<dyn std::ops::FnOnce() + std::marker::Send>>, ()>` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/panicking.rs:492:40
= note: inside `std::panicking::r#try::<(), std::panic::AssertUnwindSafe<std::boxed::Box<dyn std::ops::FnOnce() + std::marker::Send>>>` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/panicking.rs:456:19
= note: inside `std::panic::catch_unwind::<std::panic::AssertUnwindSafe<std::boxed::Box<dyn std::ops::FnOnce() + std::marker::Send>>, ()>` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/panic.rs:137:14
= note: inside `tests::test::run_test_in_process` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/test/src/lib.rs:598:18
= note: inside closure at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/test/src/lib.rs:492:39
= note: inside `tests::test::run_test::run_test_inner` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/test/src/lib.rs:530:13
= note: inside `tests::test::run_test` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/test/src/lib.rs:562:28
= note: inside `tests::test::run_tests::<[closure@tests::test::run_tests_console::{closure#2}]>` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/test/src/lib.rs:305:17
= note: inside `tests::test::run_tests_console` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/test/src/console.rs:290:5
= note: inside `tests::test::test_main` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/test/src/lib.rs:116:15
= note: inside `tests::test::test_main_static` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/test/src/lib.rs:135:5
= note: inside `main`
= note: inside `<fn() as std::ops::FnOnce<()>>::call_once - shim(fn())` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:227:5
= note: inside `std::sys_common::backtrace::__rust_begin_short_backtrace::<fn(), ()>` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/sys_common/backtrace.rs:122:18
= note: inside closure at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/rt.rs:145:18
= note: inside `std::ops::function::impls::<impl std::ops::FnOnce<()> for &dyn std::ops::Fn() -> i32 + std::marker::Sync + std::panic::RefUnwindSafe>::call_once` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/core/src/ops/function.rs:259:13
= note: inside `std::panicking::r#try::do_call::<&dyn std::ops::Fn() -> i32 + std::marker::Sync + std::panic::RefUnwindSafe, i32>` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/panicking.rs:492:40
= note: inside `std::panicking::r#try::<i32, &dyn std::ops::Fn() -> i32 + std::marker::Sync + std::panic::RefUnwindSafe>` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/panicking.rs:456:19
= note: inside `std::panic::catch_unwind::<&dyn std::ops::Fn() -> i32 + std::marker::Sync + std::panic::RefUnwindSafe, i32>` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/panic.rs:137:14
= note: inside closure at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/rt.rs:128:48
= note: inside `std::panicking::r#try::do_call::<[closure@std::rt::lang_start_internal::{closure#2}], isize>` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/panicking.rs:492:40
= note: inside `std::panicking::r#try::<isize, [closure@std::rt::lang_start_internal::{closure#2}]>` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/panicking.rs:456:19
= note: inside `std::panic::catch_unwind::<[closure@std::rt::lang_start_internal::{closure#2}], isize>` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/panic.rs:137:14
= note: inside `std::rt::lang_start_internal` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/rt.rs:128:20
= note: inside `std::rt::lang_start::<()>` at /home/ben/.rustup/toolchains/miri/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/rt.rs:144:17
= note: this error originates in the attribute macro `test` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
error: aborting due to previous error
error: test failed, to rerun pass '--bin scratch'
```
After:
```
Finished test [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.00s
Running unittests (target/miri/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/debug/deps/scratch-9d7717efc37bb64c)
running 1 test
test tests::it_works ... error: Undefined Behavior: type validation failed: encountered a dangling reference (address 0x1 is unallocated)
--> src/main.rs:16:35
|
16 | let _x: &'static u8 = core::mem::transmute(1usize);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ type validation failed: encountered a dangling reference (address 0x1 is unallocated)
|
= help: this indicates a bug in the program: it performed an invalid operation, and caused Undefined Behavior
= help: see https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/reference/behavior-considered-undefined.html for further information
= note: inside `tests::it_works` at src/main.rs:16:35
note: inside closure at src/main.rs:14:5
--> src/main.rs:14:5
|
13 | #[test]
| ------- in this procedural macro expansion
14 | / fn it_works() {
15 | | unsafe {
16 | | let _x: &'static u8 = core::mem::transmute(1usize);
17 | | }
18 | | }
| |_____^
= note: this error originates in the attribute macro `test` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
note: Some details are omitted, run with `MIRIFLAGS=-Zmiri-backtrace=full` for a verbose backtrace.
error: aborting due to previous error
error: test failed, to rerun pass '--bin scratch'
```
Ben Kimock [Sun, 20 Feb 2022 16:55:39 +0000 (11:55 -0500)]
Prune backtraces similar to RUST_BACKTRACE=1 logic
Previously, Miri would always print a backtrace including all frames
when encountering an error. This adds -Zmiri-backtrace which defaults
to 1, internally called BacktraceStyle::Short. By default, backtraces
are pruned to start at __rust_begin_short_backtrace, similar to std.
Then we also remove non-local frames from the bottom of the trace.
This cleans up the last one or two shims outside main or a test.
Users can opt out of pruning by setting -Zmiri-backtrace=full, and will
be automatically opted out if there are no local frames because that
means the reported error is likely in the Rust runtime, which this
pruning is crafted to remove.
bors [Tue, 22 Feb 2022 02:43:53 +0000 (02:43 +0000)]
Auto merge of #1978 - RalfJung:simd_eq, r=RalfJung
implement simd_eq and simd_reduce_any
This lets us re-enable the division and modulo tests, since those operations now internally use simd_eq and simd_reduce_any.
However, I am not sure what exactly the rules are for simd_reduce_any. `@workingjubilee` for now I made it UB to call those with inputs that are not all-0 or all-1, but that might be taking it too far?
bors [Fri, 4 Feb 2022 17:01:23 +0000 (17:01 +0000)]
Auto merge of #1968 - RalfJung:rustup, r=RalfJung
rustup; implement simd_and/or
I had to disable the integer division tests since they now require simd_eq, which seems [non-trivial to implement](https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/1912#issuecomment-1030164843).
bors [Fri, 4 Feb 2022 16:18:30 +0000 (16:18 +0000)]
Auto merge of #1967 - RalfJung:rustup, r=RalfJung
rustup: disable read_dir test for now
I don't currently have time to fix our read_dir support, so I disabled the tests for now. https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/1966 tracks bringing back that functionality.
bors [Sun, 9 Jan 2022 14:10:00 +0000 (14:10 +0000)]
Auto merge of #1952 - RalfJung:self-referential, r=RalfJung
exclude mutable references to !Unpin types from uniqueness guarantees
This basically works around https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues/148 by not requiring uniqueness any more for mutable references to self-referential generators. That corresponds to [the same work-around that was applied in rustc itself](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/b81553267437627af63c79c1a20c73af865a842a/compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/layout.rs#L2482).
I am not entirely sure if this is a good idea since it might hide too many errors in case types are "accidentally" `!Unpin`. OTOH, our test suite still passes, and to my knowledge the vast majority of types is `Unpin`. (`place.layout.ty` is monomorphic, we should always exactly know which type this is.)
bors [Tue, 21 Dec 2021 21:25:52 +0000 (21:25 +0000)]
Auto merge of #1945 - saethlin:better-sb-tracking, r=RalfJung
Provide slightly better notes when tracking a pointer tag
I slapped this in as a sort of advanced println-based debugging when trying to figure out a track-raw-pointers finding in `smallvec`. Perhaps this looks like a good idea to you all?
EDIT: User scenario
Run `MIRIFLAGS=-Ztag-raw-pointers cargo miri test`, get a diagnostic that looks like
```
error: Undefined Behavior: trying to reborrow for SharedReadOnly at alloc99465+0x9, but parent tag <265507> does not have an appropriate item in the borrow stack
```
So now run `MIRIFLAGS=-Ztag-raw-pointers -Zmiri-track-pointer-tag=265507 cargo miri test`
Old:
```
note: tracking was triggered
--> src/lib.rs:822:36
|
822 | vec: NonNull::from(self),
| ^^^^ popped tracked tag for item [SharedReadOnly for <265507>]
```
New:
```
note: tracking was triggered
--> src/lib.rs:822:36
|
822 | vec: NonNull::from(self),
| ^^^^ popped tracked tag for item [SharedReadOnly for <265507>] due to Write access for <265356>
```
So that if a user is now beginning to question their sanity because they don't really understand SB yet, they can then track the tag which caused the parent tag to be removed from the stack to be sure what's going on here:
```
--> src/lib.rs:792:5
|
792 | / pub fn drain<R>(&mut self, range: R) -> Drain<'_, A>
793 | | where
794 | | R: RangeBounds<usize>,
795 | | {
... |
824 | | }
825 | | }
| |_____^ created tag 265356
```
The existing diagnostic can tell you where the tag you'd need was invalidated, but it cannot tell you what and why that tag was invalidated.
bors [Mon, 6 Dec 2021 01:33:55 +0000 (01:33 +0000)]
Auto merge of #1930 - tavianator:avoid-adjacent-allocations, r=RalfJung
intptrcast: Never allocate two objects directly adjecent
When two objects directly follow each other in memory, what is the
provenance of an integer cast to a pointer that points directly between
them? For a zero-size region, it could point into the end of the first
object, or the start of the second.
We can avoid answering this difficult question by simply never
allocating two objects directly beside each other. This fixes some of
the false positives from #1866.
Tavian Barnes [Fri, 3 Dec 2021 20:57:37 +0000 (15:57 -0500)]
intptrcast: Never allocate two objects directly adjecent
When two objects directly follow each other in memory, what is the
provenance of an integer cast to a pointer that points directly between
them? For a zero-size region, it could point into the end of the first
object, or the start of the second.
We can avoid answering this difficult question by simply never
allocating two objects directly beside each other. This fixes some of
the false positives from #1866.
bors [Thu, 25 Nov 2021 22:55:43 +0000 (22:55 +0000)]
Auto merge of #1924 - RalfJung:ra, r=oli-obk
hack to work around RA quirk
This is a gross hack to work around https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/10793: calling `cargo-miri/miri` does the same thing as calling `./miri`.
`@oli-obk` this is the best I could come up with... not sure if we want to have this in the repo. I am also okay with carrying `cargo-miri/miri` locally.
projects / rust.git / log