bors [Tue, 23 Nov 2021 23:48:55 +0000 (23:48 +0000)]
Auto merge of #91149 - notriddle:notriddle/rustdoc-doctest-semicolon, r=jyn514
fix(doctest): detect extern crate items in statement doctests
This partially reverts #91026, because rustdoc needs to detect the extern statements, even when they appear inside implicit `main()`. It does not entirely revert it, so the old bug is still fixed, by duplicating some of the logic from `parse_mod` instead of trying to use it directly.
bors [Tue, 23 Nov 2021 20:44:33 +0000 (20:44 +0000)]
Auto merge of #91159 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-91mgg5v, r=matthiaskrgr
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #90856 (Suggestion to wrap inner types using 'allocator_api' in tuple)
- #91103 (Inhibit clicks on summary's children)
- #91137 (Give people a single link they can click in the contributing guide)
- #91140 (Split inline const to two feature gates and mark expression position inline const complete)
- #91148 (Use `derive_default_enum` in the compiler)
- #91153 (kernel_copy: avoid panic on unexpected OS error)
Matthias Krüger [Tue, 23 Nov 2021 18:28:12 +0000 (19:28 +0100)]
Rollup merge of #91153 - birkenfeld:kernel_copy_fallback, r=the8472
kernel_copy: avoid panic on unexpected OS error
According to documentation, the listed errnos should only occur
if the `copy_file_range` call cannot be made at all, so the
assert be correct. However, since in practice file system
drivers (incl. FUSE etc.) can return any errno they want, we
should not panic here.
Matthias Krüger [Tue, 23 Nov 2021 18:28:10 +0000 (19:28 +0100)]
Rollup merge of #91140 - nbdd0121:const_typeck, r=oli-obk
Split inline const to two feature gates and mark expression position inline const complete
This PR splits inline const in pattern position into its own `#![feature(inline_const_pat)]` feature gate, and make the usage in expression position complete.
I think I have resolved most outstanding issues related to `inline_const` with #89561 and other PRs. The only thing left that I am aware of is #90150 and the lack of lifetime checks when inline const is used in pattern position (FIXME in #89561). Implementation-wise when used in pattern position it has to be lowered during MIR building while in expression position it's evaluated only when monomorphizing (just like normal consts), so it makes some sense to separate it into two feature gates so one can progress without being blocked by another.
Matthias Krüger [Tue, 23 Nov 2021 18:28:09 +0000 (19:28 +0100)]
Rollup merge of #91137 - jyn514:contributing, r=spastorino
Give people a single link they can click in the contributing guide
Doc Jones mentioned that one of the things making it hard to get started
is that the amount of information is overwhelming, between the
dev-guide, contributing guide, and discussion platforms. This gives
people a single link they can click to ask for help.
Matthias Krüger [Tue, 23 Nov 2021 18:28:07 +0000 (19:28 +0100)]
Rollup merge of #91103 - jsha:non-toggle-click-doesnt-toggle, r=Manishearth,GuillaumeGomez
Inhibit clicks on summary's children
A byproduct of using `<details>` and `<summary>` to show/hide detailed documentation was that clicking any part of a method heading (or impl heading) would show or hide the documentation. This was not super noticeable because clicking a link inside the method heading would navigate to that link. But clicking any unlinked black text in a method heading would trigger the behavior.
That behavior was somewhat unexpected, and means that if you try to click a type name in a method heading, but miss by a few pixels, you get a confusing surprise.
This change inhibits that behavior by putting an event listener on most summaries that cancels the event unless the event target was the summary itself. In practice, that means it cancels the event unless the target was the "[+]" / "[-]", because the rest of the heading is wrapped inside a `<div>`, which is the target for anything that doesn't have a more specific target.
bors [Tue, 23 Nov 2021 17:44:33 +0000 (17:44 +0000)]
Auto merge of #90788 - ecstatic-morse:issue-90752, r=wesleywiser
Mark places as initialized when mutably borrowed
Fixes the example in #90752, but does not handle some corner cases involving raw pointers and unsafe. See [this comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90752#issuecomment-965822895) for more information, or the second test.
Although I talked about both `MaybeUninitializedPlaces` and `MaybeInitializedPlaces` in #90752, this PR only changes the latter. That's because "maybe uninitialized" is the conservative choice, and marking them as definitely initialized (`!maybe_uninitialized`) when a mutable borrow is created could lead to problems if `addr_of_mut` to an uninitialized local is allowed. Additionally, places cannot become uninitialized via a mutable reference, so if a place is definitely initialized, taking a mutable reference to it should not change that.
I think it's correct to ignore interior mutability as nbdd0121 suggests below. Their analysis doesn't work inside of `core::cell`, which *does* have access to `UnsafeCell`'s field, but that won't be an issue unless we explicitly instantiate one with an `enum` within that module.
bors [Tue, 23 Nov 2021 13:56:00 +0000 (13:56 +0000)]
Auto merge of #89881 - Mark-Simulacrum:fieldless-fast, r=davidtwco
Avoid generating empty closures for fieldless enum variants
For many enums, this avoids generating lots of tiny stubs that need to be codegen'd and then inlined and removed by LLVM. perf shows this to be a fairly small, but significant, win on rustc bootstrap time -- with minimal impact on runtime performance (which is at times even positive).
Georg Brandl [Tue, 23 Nov 2021 07:09:48 +0000 (08:09 +0100)]
kernel_copy: avoid panic on unexpected OS error
According to documentation, the listed errnos should only occur
if the `copy_file_range` call cannot be made at all, so the
assert be correct. However, since in practice file system
drivers (incl. FUSE etc.) can return any errno they want, we
should not panic here.
bors [Tue, 23 Nov 2021 09:10:50 +0000 (09:10 +0000)]
Auto merge of #89883 - Mark-Simulacrum:incr-verify-outline, r=nnethercote
Manually outline error on incremental_verify_ich
This reduces codegen for rustc_query_impl by 169k lines of LLVM IR, representing
a 1.2% improvement. This code should be fairly cold, so hopefully this has minimal
performance impact.
bors [Tue, 23 Nov 2021 06:08:37 +0000 (06:08 +0000)]
Auto merge of #84197 - bbjornse:stack-protector, r=nikic
add codegen option for using LLVM stack smash protection
LLVM has built-in heuristics for adding stack canaries to functions. These
heuristics can be selected with LLVM function attributes. This PR adds a codegen
option `-C stack-protector={basic,strong,all}` which controls the use of these
attributes. This gives rustc the same stack smash protection support as clang
offers through options `-fstack-protector`, `-fstack-protector-strong`, and
`-fstack-protector-all`. The protection this can offer is demonstrated in
test/ui/abi/stack-protector.rs. This fills a gap in the current list of rustc
exploit mitigations (https://doc.rust-lang.org/rustc/exploit-mitigations.html),
originally discussed in #15179.
Stack smash protection adds runtime overhead and is therefore still off by
default, but now users have the option to trade performance for security as they
see fit. An example use case is adding Rust code in an existing C/C++ code base
compiled with stack smash protection. Without the ability to add stack smash
protection to the Rust code, the code base artifacts could be exploitable in
ways not possible if the code base remained pure C/C++.
Stack smash protection support is present in LLVM for almost all the current
tier 1/tier 2 targets: see
test/assembly/stack-protector/stack-protector-target-support.rs. The one
exception is nvptx64-nvidia-cuda. This PR follows clang's example, and adds a
warning message printed if stack smash protection is used with this target (see
test/ui/stack-protector/warn-stack-protector-unsupported.rs). Support for tier 3
targets has not been checked.
Since the heuristics are applied at the LLVM level, the heuristics are expected
to add stack smash protection to a fraction of functions comparable to C/C++.
Some experiments demonstrating how Rust code is affected by the different
heuristics can be found in
test/assembly/stack-protector/stack-protector-heuristics-effect.rs. There is
potential for better heuristics using Rust-specific safety information. For
example it might be reasonable to skip stack smash protection in functions which
transitively only use safe Rust code, or which uses only a subset of functions
the user declares safe (such as anything under `std.*`). Such alternative
heuristics could be added at a later point.
LLVM also offers a "safestack" sanitizer as an alternative way to guard against
stack smashing (see #26612). This could possibly also be included as a
stack-protection heuristic. An alternative is to add it as a sanitizer (#39699).
This is what clang does: safestack is exposed with option
`-fsanitize=safe-stack`.
The options are only supported by the LLVM backend, but as with other codegen
options it is visible in the main codegen option help menu. The heuristic names
"basic", "strong", and "all" are hopefully sufficiently generic to be usable in
other backends as well.
bors [Tue, 23 Nov 2021 03:13:26 +0000 (03:13 +0000)]
Auto merge of #91094 - inquisitivecrystal:rustdoc-top-mod, r=jyn514
Avoid documenting top-level private imports
PR #88447 aimed to make rustdoc's `--document-private-items` mode only document imports that are visible outside the importing module. Unfortunately, I inadvertently set things up so that imports at the crate top-level are always documented, regardless of their visibility. This behavior was unintended and is [not desirable](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90865#issuecomment-971172649).
This PR treats top-level imports as never being visible outside their parent module. In practice, the only way a top-level import can be visible externally is if it's fully public, and there's a seperate check for that.
It's worth calling attention to the fact that this change means that `pub(crate)` imports will be visible in lower level modules, but not at the top-level. This is because, at the top level of the crate, `pub(crate)` means the same thing as `pub(self)`.
It turned out that there were existing tests checking for the only behavior, which I didn't notice at the time of my previous PR. I have updated them to check for the new behavior and substantially extended them to handle differences between the top-level module and lower level modules. I may have gone overboard, so please tell me if there's anything I should cut.
Michael Howell [Tue, 23 Nov 2021 02:47:58 +0000 (19:47 -0700)]
fix(doctest): detect extern crate items in statement doctests
This partially reverts #91026, because rustdoc needs to detect the extern statements,
even when they appear inside implicit `main()`. It does not entirely revert it,
so the old bug is still fixed, by duplicating some of the logic from `parse_mod`
instead of trying to use it directly.
Matthias Krüger [Mon, 22 Nov 2021 22:30:32 +0000 (23:30 +0100)]
Rollup merge of #91144 - ehuss:update-cargo, r=ehuss
Update cargo
7 commits in ad50d0d266213e0cc4f6e526a39d96faae9a3842..e1fb17631eb1b3665cdbe45b1c186111577ef512
2021-11-17 18:36:37 +0000 to 2021-11-22 16:53:06 +0000
- re-enable lto_build test on 32-bit MSVC (rust-lang/cargo#10110)
- Fix a couple issues with cyclic features and dev-dependencies (rust-lang/cargo#10103)
- Add --message-format for install command (rust-lang/cargo#10107)
- Update curl dependency, remove M1 macOS build error note (rust-lang/cargo#10106)
- Make clippy happy (rust-lang/cargo#10105)
- Give a hard error if `-Zrustdoc-scrape-examples` is missing a flag (rust-lang/cargo#10043)
- silly fix, pointer to the empty slice (rust-lang/cargo#10097)
Matthias Krüger [Mon, 22 Nov 2021 22:30:30 +0000 (23:30 +0100)]
Rollup merge of #91143 - ehuss:update-books, r=ehuss
Update books
## reference
3 commits in a01d151a7250a540a9cb7ccce5956f020c677c21..c0f222da23568477155991d391c9ce918e381351
2021-10-22 22:34:13 +0900 to 2021-11-22 10:30:57 -0800
- Byte literal and string syntax: add missing quote escapes (rust-lang/reference#1101)
- fix crate_name attribute description (rust-lang/reference#1109)
- Update list of types with magic Copy impls (rust-lang/reference#1104)
## book
19 commits in 5c5dbc5b196c9564422b3193264f3288d2a051ce..a5e0c5b2c5f9054be3b961aea2c7edfeea591de8
2021-11-09 19:30:43 -0500 to 2021-11-19 17:06:19 -0500
- Propagate edits to chapter 4 back
- Edits to the edits of chapter 4
- ch 4 from nostarch
- Fix install links
- Snapshot of chapter 10
- Fix quotes
- Add more explanation of Self in chapter 10. Fixes rust-lang/book#2222.
- We've defined the signatures, not behaviors. Fixes rust-lang/book#2917
- Remove 'most distinctive' claim. Fixes rust-lang/book#2861.
- Clarify that traits must be brought into scope to use their methods
- Explain why lifetimes are part of the function contract better
- Further edits to rust-lang/book#2895
- Clarify generic types in mixin
- Change 'either' to 'at least one of'. See rust-lang/book#2885
- Clarify explanation of lifetime annotations a bit
- Further edits to clarify code explanation
- Clarify the meaning of a sentence in ch10-03
- Clarify this code is demonstrating usage of the library from a binary. Fixes rust-lang/book#1445.
- Clarify generics in method definitions and impls. Fixes rust-lang/book#2679.
Matthias Krüger [Mon, 22 Nov 2021 22:30:29 +0000 (23:30 +0100)]
Rollup merge of #91102 - jsha:theme-anchor, r=GuillaumeGomez
Set color for <a> in a more straightforward way.
Previously, we set the default color for <a> tags to black, and then had an override with a bunch of not() clauses to set anchors in
docblocks to blue.
Instead, we should set the default color for <a> to blue (or equivalent in other themes), and override it for places like the sidebar or search results, where we don't want them to be styled as links.
Demo at https://rustdoc.crud.net/jsha/theme-anchor/std/string/struct.String.html. This should result in no visible changes.
Joshua Nelson [Mon, 22 Nov 2021 17:55:00 +0000 (11:55 -0600)]
Give people a single link they can click in the contributing guide
Doc Jones mentioned that one of the things making it hard to get started
is that the amount of information is overwhelming, between the
dev-guide, contributing guide, and discussion platforms. This gives
people a single link they can click to ask for help.
add rustc option for using LLVM stack smash protection
LLVM has built-in heuristics for adding stack canaries to functions. These
heuristics can be selected with LLVM function attributes. This patch adds a
rustc option `-Z stack-protector={none,basic,strong,all}` which controls the use
of these attributes. This gives rustc the same stack smash protection support as
clang offers through options `-fno-stack-protector`, `-fstack-protector`,
`-fstack-protector-strong`, and `-fstack-protector-all`. The protection this can
offer is demonstrated in test/ui/abi/stack-protector.rs. This fills a gap in the
current list of rustc exploit
mitigations (https://doc.rust-lang.org/rustc/exploit-mitigations.html),
originally discussed in #15179.
Stack smash protection adds runtime overhead and is therefore still off by
default, but now users have the option to trade performance for security as they
see fit. An example use case is adding Rust code in an existing C/C++ code base
compiled with stack smash protection. Without the ability to add stack smash
protection to the Rust code, the code base artifacts could be exploitable in
ways not possible if the code base remained pure C/C++.
Stack smash protection support is present in LLVM for almost all the current
tier 1/tier 2 targets: see
test/assembly/stack-protector/stack-protector-target-support.rs. The one
exception is nvptx64-nvidia-cuda. This patch follows clang's example, and adds a
warning message printed if stack smash protection is used with this target (see
test/ui/stack-protector/warn-stack-protector-unsupported.rs). Support for tier 3
targets has not been checked.
Since the heuristics are applied at the LLVM level, the heuristics are expected
to add stack smash protection to a fraction of functions comparable to C/C++.
Some experiments demonstrating how Rust code is affected by the different
heuristics can be found in
test/assembly/stack-protector/stack-protector-heuristics-effect.rs. There is
potential for better heuristics using Rust-specific safety information. For
example it might be reasonable to skip stack smash protection in functions which
transitively only use safe Rust code, or which uses only a subset of functions
the user declares safe (such as anything under `std.*`). Such alternative
heuristics could be added at a later point.
LLVM also offers a "safestack" sanitizer as an alternative way to guard against
stack smashing (see #26612). This could possibly also be included as a
stack-protection heuristic. An alternative is to add it as a sanitizer (#39699).
This is what clang does: safestack is exposed with option
`-fsanitize=safe-stack`.
The options are only supported by the LLVM backend, but as with other codegen
options it is visible in the main codegen option help menu. The heuristic names
"basic", "strong", and "all" are hopefully sufficiently generic to be usable in
other backends as well.
Reviewed-by: Nikita Popov <nikic@php.net>
Extra commits during review:
- [address-review] make the stack-protector option unstable
- [address-review] reduce detail level of stack-protector option help text
- [address-review] correct grammar in comment
- [address-review] use compiler flag to avoid merging functions in test
- [address-review] specify min LLVM version in fortanix stack-protector test
Only for Fortanix test, since this target specifically requests the
`--x86-experimental-lvi-inline-asm-hardening` flag.
- [address-review] specify required LLVM components in stack-protector tests
- move stack protector option enum closer to other similar option enums
- rustc_interface/tests: sort debug option list in tracking hash test
- add an explicit `none` stack-protector option
Revert "set LLVM requirements for all stack protector support test revisions"
Previously, we set the default color for <a> tags to black, and then
had an override with a bunch of not() clauses to set anchors in
docblocks to blue.
Instead, we should set the default color for <a> to blue (or equivalent
in other themes), and override it for places like the sidebar or search
results, where we don't want them to be styled as links.
bors [Mon, 22 Nov 2021 02:15:25 +0000 (02:15 +0000)]
Auto merge of #88681 - ehuss:duplicate-attributes, r=petrochenkov
Check for duplicate attributes.
This adds some checks for duplicate attributes. In many cases, the duplicates were being ignored without error or warning. This adds several kinds of checks (see `AttributeDuplicates` enum).
The motivation here is to issue unused warnings with similar reasoning for any unused lint, and to error for cases where there are conflicts.
This also adds a check for empty attribute lists in a few attributes where this causes the attribute to be ignored.
bors [Sun, 21 Nov 2021 21:20:20 +0000 (21:20 +0000)]
Auto merge of #90352 - camsteffen:for-loop-desugar, r=oli-obk
Simplify `for` loop desugar
Basically two intermediate bindings are inlined. I could have left one intermediate binding in place as this would simplify some diagnostic logic, but I think the difference in that regard would be negligible, so it is better to have a minimal HIR.
For checking that the pattern is irrefutable, I added a special case when the `match` is found to be non-exhaustive.
The reordering of the arms is purely stylistic. I don't *think* there are any perf implications.
```diff
match IntoIterator::into_iter($head) {
mut iter => {
$label: loop {
- let mut __next;
match Iterator::next(&mut iter) {
- Some(val) => __next = val,
None => break,
+ Some($pat) => $block,
}
- let $pat = __next;
- $block
}
}
}
```
bors [Sun, 21 Nov 2021 10:19:33 +0000 (10:19 +0000)]
Auto merge of #91104 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-duk33o1, r=matthiaskrgr
Rollup of 4 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #91008 (Adds IEEE 754-2019 minimun and maximum functions for f32/f64)
- #91070 (Make `LLVMRustGetOrInsertGlobal` always return a `GlobalVariable`)
- #91097 (Add spaces in opaque `impl Trait` with more than one trait)
- #91098 (Don't suggest certain fixups (`.field`, `.await`, etc) when reporting errors while matching on arrays )
Matthias Krüger [Sun, 21 Nov 2021 08:55:16 +0000 (09:55 +0100)]
Rollup merge of #91098 - compiler-errors:issue-91058, r=estebank
Don't suggest certain fixups (`.field`, `.await`, etc) when reporting errors while matching on arrays
When we have a type mismatch with a `cause.code` that is an `ObligationCauseCode::Pattern`, skip suggesting fixes like adding `.await` or accessing a struct's `.field` if the pattern's `root_ty` differs from the `expected` ty. This occurs in situations like this:
```rust
struct S(());
fn main() {
let array = [S(())];
match array {
[()] => {}
_ => {}
}
}
```
I think what's happening here is a layer of `[_; N]` is peeled off of both types and we end up seeing the mismatch between just `S` and `()`, but when we suggest a fixup, that applies to the expression with type `root_ty`.
---
Questions:
1. Should this check live here, above all of the suggestions, or should I push this down into every suggestion when we match `ObligationCauseCode`?
2. Any other `ObligationCauseCode`s to check here?
3. Am I overlooking an easier way to get to this same conclusion without pattern matching on `ObligationCauseCode` and comparing `root_ty`?
Matthias Krüger [Sun, 21 Nov 2021 08:55:14 +0000 (09:55 +0100)]
Rollup merge of #91070 - cuviper:insert-global, r=nagisa
Make `LLVMRustGetOrInsertGlobal` always return a `GlobalVariable`
`Module::getOrInsertGlobal` returns a `Constant*`, which is a super
class of `GlobalVariable`, but if the given type doesn't match an
existing declaration, it returns a bitcast of that global instead.
This causes UB when we pass that to `LLVMGetVisibility` which
unconditionally casts the opaque argument to a `GlobalValue*`.
Instead, we can do our own get-or-insert without worrying whether
existing types match exactly. It's not relevant when we're just trying
to get/set the linkage and visibility, and if types are needed we can
bitcast or error nicely from `rustc_codegen_llvm` instead.
Matthias Krüger [Sun, 21 Nov 2021 08:55:13 +0000 (09:55 +0100)]
Rollup merge of #91008 - Urgau:float-minimum-maximum, r=scottmcm
Adds IEEE 754-2019 minimun and maximum functions for f32/f64
IEEE 754-2019 removed the `minNum` (`min` in Rust) and `maxNum` (`max` in Rust) operations in favor of the newly created `minimum` and `maximum` operations due to their [non-associativity](https://grouper.ieee.org/groups/msc/ANSI_IEEE-Std-754-2019/background/minNum_maxNum_Removal_Demotion_v3.pdf) that cannot be fix in a backwards compatible manner. This PR adds `fN::{minimun,maximum}` functions following the new rules.
### IEEE 754-2019 Rules
> **minimum(x, y)** is x if x < y, y if y < x, and a quiet NaN if either operand is a NaN, according to 6.2.
For this operation, −0 compares less than +0. Otherwise (i.e., when x = y and signs are the same)
it is either x or y.
> **maximum(x, y)** is x if x > y, y if y > x, and a quiet NaN if either operand is a NaN, according to 6.2.
For this operation, +0 compares greater than −0. Otherwise (i.e., when x = y and signs are the
same) it is either x or y.
"IEEE Standard for Floating-Point Arithmetic," in IEEE Std 754-2019 (Revision of IEEE 754-2008) , vol., no., pp.1-84, 22 July 2019, doi: 10.1109/IEEESTD.2019.8766229.
### Implementation
This implementation is inspired by the one in [`glibc` ](https://github.com/bminor/glibc/blob/90f0ac10a74b2d43b5a65aab4be40565e359be43/math/s_fminimum_template.c) (it self derived from the C2X draft) expect that:
- it doesn't use `copysign` because it's not available in `core` and also because `copysign` is unnecessary (we only want to check the sign, no need to create a new float)
- it also prefer `other > self` instead of `self < other` like IEEE 754-2019 does
I originally tried to implement them [using intrinsics](https://github.com/Urgau/rust/commit/1d8aa13bc39eeef1afba0524dc5ea10d073522e6) but LLVM [error out](https://godbolt.org/z/7sMrxW49a) when trying to lower them to machine intructions, GCC doesn't yet have built-ins for them, only cranelift support them nativelly (as it doesn't support the nativelly the old sementics).
Helps with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/83984
A byproduct of using `<details>` and `<summary>` to show/hide detailed
documentation was that clicking any part of a method heading (or impl
heading) would show or hide the documentation. This was not super
noticeable because clicking a link inside the method heading would
navigate to that link. But clicking any unlinked black text in a method
heading would trigger the behavior.
That behavior was somewhat unexpected, and means that if you try to click
a type name in a method heading, but miss by a few pixels, you get a
confusing surprise.
This change inhibits that behavior by putting an event listener on most
summaries that cancels the event unless the event target was the summary
itself. In practice, that means it cancels the event unless the target
was the "[+]" / "[-]", because the rest of the heading is wrapped inside
a `<div>`, which is the target for anything that doesn't have a more
specific target.
bors [Sun, 21 Nov 2021 07:15:32 +0000 (07:15 +0000)]
Auto merge of #89580 - estebank:trait-bounds-are-tricky, r=nagisa
Point at source of trait bound obligations in more places
Be more thorough in using `ItemObligation` and `BindingObligation` when
evaluating obligations so that we can point at trait bounds that
introduced unfulfilled obligations. We no longer incorrectly point at
unrelated trait bounds (`substs-ppaux.verbose.stderr`).
In particular, we now point at trait bounds on method calls.
We no longer point at "obvious" obligation sources (we no longer have a
note pointing at `Trait` saying "required by a bound in `Trait`", like
in `associated-types-no-suitable-supertrait*`).
We no longer point at associated items (`ImplObligation`), as they didn't
add any user actionable information, they just added noise.
bors [Sat, 20 Nov 2021 21:40:43 +0000 (21:40 +0000)]
Auto merge of #91093 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-kovzwx0, r=matthiaskrgr
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #89741 (Mark `Arc::from_inner` / `Rc::from_inner` as unsafe)
- #90927 (Fix float ICE)
- #90994 (Fix ICE `#90993`: add missing call to cancel)
- #91018 (Adopt let_else in more places in rustc_mir_build)
- #91022 (Suggest `await` in more situations where infer types are involved)
- #91088 (Revert "require full validity when determining the discriminant of a value")
Matthias Krüger [Sat, 20 Nov 2021 21:33:51 +0000 (22:33 +0100)]
Rollup merge of #91022 - compiler-errors:modulo_infer, r=estebank
Suggest `await` in more situations where infer types are involved
Currently we use `TyS::same_type` in diagnostics that suggest adding `.await` to opaque future types.
This change makes the suggestion slightly more general, when we're comparing types like `Result<T, E>` and `Result<_, _>` which happens sometimes in places like `match` patterns or `let` statements with partially-elaborated types.
----
Question:
1. Is this change worthwhile? Totally fine if it doesn't make sense adding.
2. Should `same_type_modulo_infer` live in `rustc_infer::infer::error_reporting` or alongside the other method in `rustc_middle::ty::util`?
3. Should we generalize this change? I wanted to change all usages, but I don't want erroneous suggestions when adding `.field_name`...
Esteban Kuber [Tue, 5 Oct 2021 23:04:09 +0000 (23:04 +0000)]
Point at source of trait bound obligations in more places
Be more thorough in using `ItemObligation` and `BindingObligation` when
evaluating obligations so that we can point at trait bounds that
introduced unfulfilled obligations. We no longer incorrectly point at
unrelated trait bounds (`substs-ppaux.verbose.stderr`).
In particular, we now point at trait bounds on method calls.
We no longer point at "obvious" obligation sources (we no longer have a
note pointing at `Trait` saying "required by a bound in `Trait`", like
in `associated-types-no-suitable-supertrait*`).
bors [Sat, 20 Nov 2021 18:23:11 +0000 (18:23 +0000)]
Auto merge of #87704 - ChrisDenton:win-resolve-exe, r=yaahc
Windows: Resolve `process::Command` program without using the current directory
Currently `std::process::Command` searches many directories for the executable to run, including the current directory. This has lead to a [CVE for `ripgrep`](https://cve.circl.lu/cve/CVE-2021-3013) but presumably other command line utilities could be similarly vulnerable if they run commands. This was [discussed on the internals forum](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/std-command-resolve-to-avoid-security-issues-on-windows/14800). Also discussed was [which directories should be searched](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/windows-where-should-command-new-look-for-executables/15015).
EDIT: This PR originally removed all implicit paths. They've now been added back as laid out in the rest of this comment.
## Old Search Strategy
The old search strategy is [documented here][1]. Additionally Rust adds searching the child's paths (see also #37519). So the full list of paths that were searched was:
1. The directories that are listed in the child's `PATH` environment variable.
2. The directory from which the application loaded.
3. The current directory for the parent process.
4. The 32-bit Windows system directory.
5. The 16-bit Windows system directory.
6. The Windows directory.
7. The directories that are listed in the PATH environment variable.
## New Search Strategy
The new strategy removes the current directory from the searched paths.
1. The directories that are listed in the child's PATH environment variable.
2. The directory from which the application loaded.
3. The 32-bit Windows system directory.
4. The Windows directory.
5. The directories that are listed in the parent's PATH environment variable.
Note that it also removes the 16-bit system directory, mostly because there isn't a function to get it. I do not anticipate this being an issue in modern Windows.
## Impact
Removing the current directory should fix CVE's like the one linked above. However, it's possible some Windows users of affected Rust CLI applications have come to expect the old behaviour.
This change could also affect small Windows-only script-like programs that assumed the current directory would be used. The user would need to use `.\file.exe` instead of the bare application name.
This PR could break tests, especially those that test the exact output of error messages (e.g. Cargo) as this does change the error messages is some cases.
Before (cut relevant part of output):
```
note: while checking the return type of the `async fn`
--> /home/michael/test.rs:5:19
|
5 | async fn bar() -> usize {
| ^^^^^ checked the `Output` of this `async fn`, found opaque type
= note: expected type `usize`
found opaque type `impl Future`
```
After:
```
note: while checking the return type of the `async fn`
--> /home/michael/test.rs:5:19
|
5 | async fn bar() -> usize {
| ^^^^^ checked the `Output` of this `async fn`, found opaque type
= note: expected type `usize`
found opaque type `impl Future<Output = usize>`
```
Note the "found opaque type `impl Future<Output = usize>`" in the new output.
----
Questions:
1. We skip printing the output type when it's a projection, since I have been seeing some types like `impl Future<Output = <[static generator@/home/michael/test.rs:2:11: 2:21] as Generator<ResumeTy>>::Return>` which are not particularly helpful and leak implementation detail.
* Am I able to normalize this type within `rustc_middle::ty::print::pretty`? Alternatively, can we normalize it when creating the diagnostic? Otherwise, I'm fine with skipping it and falling back to the old output.
* Should I suppress any other types? I didn't encounter anything other than this generator projection type.
2. Not sure what the formatting of this should be. Do I include spaces in `Output = `?
Sadly, I wasn't able to add a GUI test to ensure that the scrollbar was always displayed because it seems not possible in puppeteer for whatever reason... I used this method: on small pages (like `lib2/sub_mod/index.html`), comparing `.navbar`'s `clientWidth` with `offsetWidth` (the first doesn't include the sidebar in the computed amount). When checking in the browser, it works fine but in puppeteer it almost never works...
In case anyone want to try to solve the bug, here is the puppeteer code:
<details>
More information about this: I tried another approach which was to get the element in `evaluate` directly (by calling it from `page.evaluate(() => { .. });` directly instead of `parseAssertElemProp.evaluate(e => {...});`.
Matthias Krüger [Sat, 20 Nov 2021 09:21:14 +0000 (10:21 +0100)]
Rollup merge of #90930 - Nilstrieb:fix-non-const-value-ice, r=estebank
Fix `non-constant value` ICE (#90878)
This also fixes the same suggestion, which was kind of broken, because it just searched for the last occurence of `const` to replace with a `let`. This works great in some cases, but when there is no const and a leading space to the file, it doesn't work and panic with overflow because it thought that it had found a const.
I also changed the suggestion to only trigger if the `const` and the non-constant value are on the same line, because if they aren't, the suggestion is very likely to be wrong.
Also don't trigger the suggestion if the found `const` is on line 0, because that triggers the ICE.
Asking Esteban to review since he was the last one to change the relevant code.
Matthias Krüger [Sat, 20 Nov 2021 09:21:13 +0000 (10:21 +0100)]
Rollup merge of #90628 - ken-matsui:clarify-error-messages-caused-by-reexporting-pub-crate-visibility-to-outside, r=oli-obk
Clarify error messages caused by re-exporting `pub(crate)` visibility to outside
This PR clarifies error messages and suggestions caused by re-exporting pub(crate) visibility outside the crate.
Here is a small example ([Rust Playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=e2cd0bd4422d4f20e6522dcbad167d3b)):
```rust
mod m {
pub(crate) enum E {}
}
pub use m::E;
fn main() {}
```
This code is compiled to:
```
error[E0365]: `E` is private, and cannot be re-exported
--> prog.rs:4:9
|
4 | pub use m::E;
| ^^^^ re-export of private `E`
|
= note: consider declaring type or module `E` with `pub`
error: aborting due to previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0365`.
```
However, enum `E` is actually public to the crate, not private totally—nevertheless, rustc treats `pub(crate)` and private visibility as the same on the error messages. They are not clear and should be segmented distinctly.
By applying changes in this PR, the error message below will be the following message that would be clearer:
```
error[E0365]: `E` is only public to inside of the crate, and cannot be re-exported outside
--> prog.rs:4:9
|
4 | pub use m::E;
| ^^^^ re-export of crate public `E`
|
= note: consider declaring type or module `E` with `pub`
error: aborting due to previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0365`.
```
projects / rust.git / log