From: Mazdak Farrokhzad Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 04:33:18 +0000 (+0100) Subject: Rollup merge of #70038 - DutchGhost:const-forget-tests, r=RalfJung X-Git-Url: https://git.lizzy.rs/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=45b10f6f9876abe8b57394ef28e57936c4a07466;hp=801a25abc1899df538939a8c2a3907bbea62cf1c;p=rust.git Rollup merge of #70038 - DutchGhost:const-forget-tests, r=RalfJung Remove the call that makes miri fail Fixes the concern raised in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/69645/files#r392884274 cc @RalfJung --- diff --git a/src/libcore/tests/mem.rs b/src/libcore/tests/mem.rs index 8337ab10341..59588d97787 100644 --- a/src/libcore/tests/mem.rs +++ b/src/libcore/tests/mem.rs @@ -129,21 +129,3 @@ fn is_send_sync() {} is_send_sync::>(); is_send_sync::>(); } - -#[test] -fn test_const_forget() { - const _: () = forget(0i32); - const _: () = forget(Vec::>>::new()); - - // Writing this function signature without const-forget - // triggers compiler errors: - // 1) That we use a non-const fn inside a const fn - // 2) without the forget, it complains about the destructor of Box - const fn const_forget_box(x: Box) { - forget(x); - } - - // Call the forget_box at runtime, - // as we can't const-construct a box yet. - const_forget_box(Box::new(0i32)); -} diff --git a/src/test/ui/consts/const_forget.rs b/src/test/ui/consts/const_forget.rs new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2dcb72a5a09 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/test/ui/consts/const_forget.rs @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ +// check-pass + +#![feature(const_forget)] + +use std::mem::forget; + +const _: () = forget(0i32); +const _: () = forget(Vec::>>::new()); + +// Writing this function signature without const-forget +// triggers compiler errors: +// 1) That we use a non-const fn inside a const fn +// 2) without the forget, it complains about the destructor of Box +// +// FIXME: this method cannot be called in const-eval yet, as Box isn't +// const constructable +#[allow(unused)] +const fn const_forget_box(b: Box) { + forget(b); +} + +fn main() {}