LifetimeRes::Fresh { param, binder: _ } => {
debug_assert_eq!(lifetime.ident.name, kw::UnderscoreLifetime);
- let old_def_id = self.local_def_id(param);
- if remapping.get(&old_def_id).is_none() {
+ if let Some(old_def_id) = self.opt_local_def_id(param) && remapping.get(&old_def_id).is_none() {
let node_id = self.next_node_id();
let new_def_id = self.create_def(
sess.emit_err(session_diagnostics::MultipleStabilityLevels { span });
}
AttrError::UnsupportedLiteral(reason, is_bytestr) => {
- sess.emit_err(session_diagnostics::UnsupportedLiteral { span, reason, is_bytestr });
+ sess.emit_err(session_diagnostics::UnsupportedLiteral {
+ span,
+ reason,
+ is_bytestr,
+ start_point_span: sess.source_map().start_point(span),
+ });
}
}
}
&name,
),
});
- } else {
- if matches!(
- meta_item.name_or_empty(),
- sym::C | sym::simd | sym::transparent
- ) || int_type_of_word(meta_item.name_or_empty()).is_some()
- {
- recognised = true;
- sess.emit_err(session_diagnostics::InvalidReprHintNoValue {
- span: meta_item.span,
- name: meta_item.name_or_empty().to_ident_string(),
- });
- }
+ } else if matches!(
+ meta_item.name_or_empty(),
+ sym::C | sym::simd | sym::transparent
+ ) || int_type_of_word(meta_item.name_or_empty()).is_some()
+ {
+ recognised = true;
+ sess.emit_err(session_diagnostics::InvalidReprHintNoValue {
+ span: meta_item.span,
+ name: meta_item.name_or_empty().to_ident_string(),
+ });
}
} else if let MetaItemKind::List(_) = meta_item.kind {
if meta_item.has_name(sym::align) {
use std::num::IntErrorKind;
use rustc_ast as ast;
-use rustc_errors::{error_code, fluent, Applicability, DiagnosticBuilder, ErrorGuaranteed};
+use rustc_errors::{
+ error_code, fluent, Applicability, DiagnosticBuilder, ErrorGuaranteed, Handler,
+};
use rustc_macros::SessionDiagnostic;
-use rustc_session::{parse::ParseSess, SessionDiagnostic};
+use rustc_session::SessionDiagnostic;
use rustc_span::{Span, Symbol};
use crate::UnsupportedLiteralReason;
// Manual implementation to be able to format `expected` items correctly.
impl<'a> SessionDiagnostic<'a> for UnknownMetaItem<'_> {
- fn into_diagnostic(self, sess: &'a ParseSess) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ErrorGuaranteed> {
+ fn into_diagnostic(self, handler: &'a Handler) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ErrorGuaranteed> {
let expected = self.expected.iter().map(|name| format!("`{}`", name)).collect::<Vec<_>>();
- let mut diag = sess.span_diagnostic.struct_span_err_with_code(
+ let mut diag = handler.struct_span_err_with_code(
self.span,
fluent::attr::unknown_meta_item,
error_code!(E0541),
pub span: Span,
pub reason: UnsupportedLiteralReason,
pub is_bytestr: bool,
+ pub start_point_span: Span,
}
impl<'a> SessionDiagnostic<'a> for UnsupportedLiteral {
- fn into_diagnostic(self, sess: &'a ParseSess) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ErrorGuaranteed> {
- let mut diag = sess.span_diagnostic.struct_span_err_with_code(
+ fn into_diagnostic(self, handler: &'a Handler) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ErrorGuaranteed> {
+ let mut diag = handler.struct_span_err_with_code(
self.span,
match self.reason {
UnsupportedLiteralReason::Generic => fluent::attr::unsupported_literal_generic,
);
if self.is_bytestr {
diag.span_suggestion(
- sess.source_map().start_point(self.span),
+ self.start_point_span,
fluent::attr::unsupported_literal_suggestion,
"",
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
None
}
- fn zst_to_backend(&self, _ty: Type<'gcc>) -> RValue<'gcc> {
- self.const_undef(self.type_ix(0))
- }
-
fn scalar_to_backend(&self, cv: Scalar, layout: abi::Scalar, ty: Type<'gcc>) -> RValue<'gcc> {
let bitsize = if layout.is_bool() { 1 } else { layout.size(self).bits() };
match cv {
})
}
- fn zst_to_backend(&self, _llty: &'ll Type) -> &'ll Value {
- self.const_undef(self.type_ix(0))
- }
-
fn scalar_to_backend(&self, cv: Scalar, layout: abi::Scalar, llty: &'ll Type) -> &'ll Value {
let bitsize = if layout.is_bool() { 1 } else { layout.size(self).bits() };
match cv {
) -> Self {
let layout = bx.layout_of(ty);
- if layout.is_zst() {
- return OperandRef::new_zst(bx, layout);
- }
-
let val = match val {
ConstValue::Scalar(x) => {
let Abi::Scalar(scalar) = layout.abi else {
let llval = bx.scalar_to_backend(x, scalar, bx.immediate_backend_type(layout));
OperandValue::Immediate(llval)
}
- ConstValue::ZeroSized => {
- let llval = bx.zst_to_backend(bx.immediate_backend_type(layout));
- OperandValue::Immediate(llval)
- }
+ ConstValue::ZeroSized => return OperandRef::new_zst(bx, layout),
ConstValue::Slice { data, start, end } => {
let Abi::ScalarPair(a_scalar, _) = layout.abi else {
bug!("from_const: invalid ScalarPair layout: {:#?}", layout);
fn const_data_from_alloc(&self, alloc: ConstAllocation<'tcx>) -> Self::Value;
fn scalar_to_backend(&self, cv: Scalar, layout: abi::Scalar, llty: Self::Type) -> Self::Value;
- fn zst_to_backend(&self, llty: Self::Type) -> Self::Value;
fn from_const_alloc(
&self,
layout: TyAndLayout<'tcx>,
fn treat_err_as_bug(&self) -> bool {
self.flags.treat_err_as_bug.map_or(false, |c| {
- self.err_count()
- + self.lint_err_count
- + self.delayed_span_bugs.len()
- + self.delayed_good_path_bugs.len()
- >= c.get()
+ self.err_count() + self.lint_err_count + self.delayed_bug_count() >= c.get()
})
}
+ fn delayed_bug_count(&self) -> usize {
+ self.delayed_span_bugs.len() + self.delayed_good_path_bugs.len()
+ }
+
fn print_error_count(&mut self, registry: &Registry) {
self.emit_stashed_diagnostics();
// incrementing `err_count` by one, so we need to +1 the comparing.
// FIXME: Would be nice to increment err_count in a more coherent way.
if self.flags.treat_err_as_bug.map_or(false, |c| {
- self.err_count()
- + self.lint_err_count
- + self.delayed_span_bugs.len()
- + self.delayed_good_path_bugs.len()
- + 1
- >= c.get()
+ self.err_count() + self.lint_err_count + self.delayed_bug_count() + 1 >= c.get()
}) {
// FIXME: don't abort here if report_delayed_bugs is off
self.span_bug(sp, msg);
if self.treat_err_as_bug() {
match (
self.err_count() + self.lint_err_count,
+ self.delayed_bug_count(),
self.flags.treat_err_as_bug.map(|c| c.get()).unwrap_or(0),
) {
- (1, 1) => panic!("aborting due to `-Z treat-err-as-bug=1`"),
- (0 | 1, _) => {}
- (count, as_bug) => panic!(
- "aborting after {} errors due to `-Z treat-err-as-bug={}`",
- count, as_bug,
- ),
+ (1, 0, 1) => panic!("aborting due to `-Z treat-err-as-bug=1`"),
+ (0, 1, 1) => panic!("aborting due delayed bug with `-Z treat-err-as-bug=1`"),
+ (count, delayed_count, as_bug) => {
+ if delayed_count > 0 {
+ panic!(
+ "aborting after {} errors and {} delayed bugs due to `-Z treat-err-as-bug={}`",
+ count, delayed_count, as_bug,
+ )
+ } else {
+ panic!(
+ "aborting after {} errors due to `-Z treat-err-as-bug={}`",
+ count, as_bug,
+ )
+ }
+ }
}
}
}
type_param_span: Option<(Span, bool)>,
bound_kind: GenericKind<'tcx>,
sub: S,
+ add_lt_sugg: Option<(Span, String)>,
) {
let msg = "consider adding an explicit lifetime bound";
if let Some((sp, has_lifetimes)) = type_param_span {
let suggestion =
if has_lifetimes { format!(" + {}", sub) } else { format!(": {}", sub) };
- err.span_suggestion_verbose(
- sp,
- &format!("{}...", msg),
- suggestion,
+ let mut suggestions = vec![(sp, suggestion)];
+ if let Some(add_lt_sugg) = add_lt_sugg {
+ suggestions.push(add_lt_sugg);
+ }
+ err.multipart_suggestion_verbose(
+ format!("{msg}..."),
+ suggestions,
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect, // Issue #41966
);
} else {
- let consider = format!("{} `{}: {}`...", msg, bound_kind, sub,);
+ let consider = format!("{} `{}: {}`...", msg, bound_kind, sub);
err.help(&consider);
}
}
};
let mut sugg =
vec![(sp, suggestion), (span.shrink_to_hi(), format!(" + {}", new_lt))];
- if let Some(lt) = add_lt_sugg {
+ if let Some(lt) = add_lt_sugg.clone() {
sugg.push(lt);
sugg.rotate_right(1);
}
// for the bound is not suitable for suggestions when `-Zverbose` is set because it
// uses `Debug` output, so we handle it specially here so that suggestions are
// always correct.
- binding_suggestion(&mut err, type_param_span, bound_kind, name);
+ binding_suggestion(&mut err, type_param_span, bound_kind, name, None);
err
}
"{} may not live long enough",
labeled_user_string
);
- binding_suggestion(&mut err, type_param_span, bound_kind, "'static");
+ binding_suggestion(&mut err, type_param_span, bound_kind, "'static", None);
err
}
new_binding_suggestion(&mut err, type_param_span);
}
_ => {
- binding_suggestion(&mut err, type_param_span, bound_kind, new_lt);
+ binding_suggestion(
+ &mut err,
+ type_param_span,
+ bound_kind,
+ new_lt,
+ add_lt_sugg,
+ );
}
}
}
multi_suggestions,
bad_label,
}
- .into_diagnostic(&self.tcx.sess.parse_sess),
+ .into_diagnostic(&self.tcx.sess.parse_sess.span_diagnostic),
TypeAnnotationNeeded::E0283 => AmbigousImpl {
span,
source_kind,
multi_suggestions,
bad_label,
}
- .into_diagnostic(&self.tcx.sess.parse_sess),
+ .into_diagnostic(&self.tcx.sess.parse_sess.span_diagnostic),
TypeAnnotationNeeded::E0284 => AmbigousReturn {
span,
source_kind,
multi_suggestions,
bad_label,
}
- .into_diagnostic(&self.tcx.sess.parse_sess),
+ .into_diagnostic(&self.tcx.sess.parse_sess.span_diagnostic),
}
}
multi_suggestions,
bad_label: None,
}
- .into_diagnostic(&self.tcx.sess.parse_sess),
+ .into_diagnostic(&self.tcx.sess.parse_sess.span_diagnostic),
TypeAnnotationNeeded::E0283 => AmbigousImpl {
span,
source_kind,
multi_suggestions,
bad_label: None,
}
- .into_diagnostic(&self.tcx.sess.parse_sess),
+ .into_diagnostic(&self.tcx.sess.parse_sess.span_diagnostic),
TypeAnnotationNeeded::E0284 => AmbigousReturn {
span,
source_kind,
multi_suggestions,
bad_label: None,
}
- .into_diagnostic(&self.tcx.sess.parse_sess),
+ .into_diagnostic(&self.tcx.sess.parse_sess.span_diagnostic),
}
}
span,
generator_kind: GeneratorKindAsDiagArg(kind),
}
- .into_diagnostic(&self.tcx.sess.parse_sess)
+ .into_diagnostic(&self.tcx.sess.parse_sess.span_diagnostic)
}
}
-use rustc_errors::{fluent, AddSubdiagnostic, ErrorGuaranteed};
+use rustc_errors::{fluent, AddSubdiagnostic, ErrorGuaranteed, Handler};
use rustc_macros::{SessionDiagnostic, SessionSubdiagnostic};
-use rustc_session::{lint::Level, parse::ParseSess, SessionDiagnostic};
+use rustc_session::{lint::Level, SessionDiagnostic};
use rustc_span::{Span, Symbol};
#[derive(SessionDiagnostic)]
impl SessionDiagnostic<'_> for CheckNameUnknown {
fn into_diagnostic(
self,
- sess: &ParseSess,
+ handler: &Handler,
) -> rustc_errors::DiagnosticBuilder<'_, ErrorGuaranteed> {
- let mut diag = sess.struct_err(fluent::lint::check_name_unknown);
+ let mut diag = handler.struct_err(fluent::lint::check_name_unknown);
diag.code(rustc_errors::error_code!(E0602));
if let Some(suggestion) = self.suggestion {
diag.help(fluent::lint::help);
{
fn into_diagnostic(
self,
- #sess: &'__session_diagnostic_sess rustc_session::parse::ParseSess
+ #sess: &'__session_diagnostic_sess rustc_errors::Handler
) -> rustc_errors::DiagnosticBuilder<'__session_diagnostic_sess, G> {
use rustc_errors::IntoDiagnosticArg;
#implementation
impl SessionDiagnostic<'_> for MultipleCandidates {
fn into_diagnostic(
self,
- sess: &'_ rustc_session::parse::ParseSess,
+ handler: &'_ rustc_errors::Handler,
) -> rustc_errors::DiagnosticBuilder<'_, ErrorGuaranteed> {
- let mut diag = sess.struct_err(rustc_errors::fluent::metadata::multiple_candidates);
+ let mut diag = handler.struct_err(rustc_errors::fluent::metadata::multiple_candidates);
diag.set_arg("crate_name", self.crate_name);
diag.set_arg("flavor", self.flavor);
diag.code(error_code!(E0465));
impl SessionDiagnostic<'_> for InvalidMetadataFiles {
fn into_diagnostic(
self,
- sess: &'_ rustc_session::parse::ParseSess,
+ handler: &'_ rustc_errors::Handler,
) -> rustc_errors::DiagnosticBuilder<'_, ErrorGuaranteed> {
- let mut diag = sess.struct_err(rustc_errors::fluent::metadata::invalid_meta_files);
+ let mut diag = handler.struct_err(rustc_errors::fluent::metadata::invalid_meta_files);
diag.set_arg("crate_name", self.crate_name);
diag.set_arg("add_info", self.add_info);
diag.code(error_code!(E0786));
impl SessionDiagnostic<'_> for CannotFindCrate {
fn into_diagnostic(
self,
- sess: &'_ rustc_session::parse::ParseSess,
+ handler: &'_ rustc_errors::Handler,
) -> rustc_errors::DiagnosticBuilder<'_, ErrorGuaranteed> {
- let mut diag = sess.struct_err(rustc_errors::fluent::metadata::cannot_find_crate);
+ let mut diag = handler.struct_err(rustc_errors::fluent::metadata::cannot_find_crate);
diag.set_arg("crate_name", self.crate_name);
diag.set_arg("add_info", self.add_info);
diag.set_arg("locator_triple", self.locator_triple.triple());
pub source_info: SourceInfo,
}
-// `LocalDecl` is used a lot. Make sure it doesn't unintentionally get bigger.
-#[cfg(all(target_arch = "x86_64", target_pointer_width = "64"))]
-static_assert_size!(LocalDecl<'_>, 56);
-
/// Extra information about a some locals that's used for diagnostics and for
/// classifying variables into local variables, statics, etc, which is needed e.g.
/// for unsafety checking.
pub kind: StatementKind<'tcx>,
}
-// `Statement` is used a lot. Make sure it doesn't unintentionally get bigger.
-#[cfg(all(target_arch = "x86_64", target_pointer_width = "64"))]
-static_assert_size!(Statement<'_>, 32);
-
impl Statement<'_> {
/// Changes a statement to a nop. This is both faster than deleting instructions and avoids
/// invalidating statement indices in `Location`s.
}
}
}
+
+// Some nodes are used a lot. Make sure they don't unintentionally get bigger.
+#[cfg(all(target_arch = "x86_64", target_pointer_width = "64"))]
+mod size_asserts {
+ use super::*;
+ use rustc_data_structures::static_assert_size;
+ // These are in alphabetical order, which is easy to maintain.
+ static_assert_size!(BasicBlockData<'_>, 144);
+ static_assert_size!(LocalDecl<'_>, 56);
+ static_assert_size!(Statement<'_>, 32);
+ static_assert_size!(StatementKind<'_>, 16);
+ static_assert_size!(Terminator<'_>, 112);
+ static_assert_size!(TerminatorKind<'_>, 96);
+}
use rustc_middle::ty::{self, AdtDef, Ty, UpvarSubsts};
use rustc_middle::ty::{CanonicalUserType, CanonicalUserTypeAnnotation};
use rustc_span::def_id::LocalDefId;
-use rustc_span::{Span, Symbol, DUMMY_SP};
+use rustc_span::{sym, Span, Symbol, DUMMY_SP};
use rustc_target::abi::VariantIdx;
use rustc_target::asm::InlineAsmRegOrRegClass;
use std::fmt;
Ok(())
}
PatKind::Variant { ref subpatterns, .. } | PatKind::Leaf { ref subpatterns } => {
- let variant = match self.kind {
- PatKind::Variant { adt_def, variant_index, .. } => {
- Some(adt_def.variant(variant_index))
- }
- _ => self.ty.ty_adt_def().and_then(|adt| {
- if !adt.is_enum() { Some(adt.non_enum_variant()) } else { None }
+ let variant_and_name = match self.kind {
+ PatKind::Variant { adt_def, variant_index, .. } => ty::tls::with(|tcx| {
+ let variant = adt_def.variant(variant_index);
+ let adt_did = adt_def.did();
+ let name = if tcx.get_diagnostic_item(sym::Option) == Some(adt_did)
+ || tcx.get_diagnostic_item(sym::Result) == Some(adt_did)
+ {
+ variant.name.to_string()
+ } else {
+ format!("{}::{}", tcx.def_path_str(adt_def.did()), variant.name)
+ };
+ Some((variant, name))
+ }),
+ _ => self.ty.ty_adt_def().and_then(|adt_def| {
+ if !adt_def.is_enum() {
+ ty::tls::with(|tcx| {
+ Some((adt_def.non_enum_variant(), tcx.def_path_str(adt_def.did())))
+ })
+ } else {
+ None
+ }
}),
};
- if let Some(variant) = variant {
- write!(f, "{}", variant.name)?;
+ if let Some((variant, name)) = &variant_and_name {
+ write!(f, "{}", name)?;
// Only for Adt we can have `S {...}`,
// which we handle separately here.
}
}
- let num_fields = variant.map_or(subpatterns.len(), |v| v.fields.len());
- if num_fields != 0 || variant.is_none() {
+ let num_fields =
+ variant_and_name.as_ref().map_or(subpatterns.len(), |(v, _)| v.fields.len());
+ if num_fields != 0 || variant_and_name.is_none() {
write!(f, "(")?;
for i in 0..num_fields {
write!(f, "{}", start_or_comma())?;
hir_id: HirId,
witnesses: Vec<DeconstructedPat<'p, 'tcx>>,
) {
- let joined_patterns = joined_uncovered_patterns(cx, &witnesses);
cx.tcx.struct_span_lint_hir(NON_EXHAUSTIVE_OMITTED_PATTERNS, hir_id, sp, |build| {
+ let joined_patterns = joined_uncovered_patterns(cx, &witnesses);
let mut lint = build.build("some variants are not matched explicitly");
lint.span_label(sp, pattern_not_covered_label(&witnesses, &joined_patterns));
lint.help(
impl SessionDiagnostic<'_> for UnusedGenericParams {
fn into_diagnostic(
self,
- sess: &'_ rustc_session::parse::ParseSess,
+ handler: &'_ rustc_errors::Handler,
) -> rustc_errors::DiagnosticBuilder<'_, ErrorGuaranteed> {
- let mut diag = sess.struct_err(rustc_errors::fluent::monomorphize::unused_generic_params);
+ let mut diag =
+ handler.struct_err(rustc_errors::fluent::monomorphize::unused_generic_params);
diag.set_span(self.span);
for (span, name) in self.param_spans.into_iter().zip(self.param_names) {
// FIXME: I can figure out how to do a label with a fluent string with a fixed message,
return Err(MissingSemicolonBeforeArray {
open_delim: open_delim_span,
semicolon: prev_span.shrink_to_hi(),
- }.into_diagnostic(self.sess));
+ }.into_diagnostic(&self.sess.span_diagnostic));
}
Ok(_) => (),
Err(err) => err.cancel(),
fn parse_try_block(&mut self, span_lo: Span) -> PResult<'a, P<Expr>> {
let (attrs, body) = self.parse_inner_attrs_and_block()?;
if self.eat_keyword(kw::Catch) {
- Err(CatchAfterTry { span: self.prev_token.span }.into_diagnostic(self.sess))
+ Err(CatchAfterTry { span: self.prev_token.span }
+ .into_diagnostic(&self.sess.span_diagnostic))
} else {
let span = span_lo.to(body.span);
self.sess.gated_spans.gate(sym::try_blocks, span);
if self.token == token::Comma {
seen_comma = true;
}
+ if self.eat(&token::Semi) {
+ let sp = self.prev_token.span;
+ let mut err = self.struct_span_err(sp, format!("{adt_ty} fields are separated by `,`"));
+ err.span_suggestion_short(
+ sp,
+ "replace `;` with `,`",
+ ",",
+ Applicability::MachineApplicable,
+ );
+ return Err(err);
+ }
match self.token.kind {
token::Comma => {
self.bump();
E0552,
"unrecognized representation hint"
)
+ .help("valid reprs are `C`, `align`, `packed`, `transparent`, `simd`, `i8`, `u8`, `i16`, `u16`, `i32`, `u32`, `i64`, `u64`, `i128`, `u128`, `isize`, `usize`")
.emit();
continue;
stack_count,
};
- cycle_diag.into_diagnostic(&sess.parse_sess)
+ cycle_diag.into_diagnostic(&sess.parse_sess.span_diagnostic)
}
pub fn print_query_stack<CTX: QueryContext>(
&'a self,
err: impl SessionDiagnostic<'a>,
) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ErrorGuaranteed> {
- err.into_diagnostic(self)
+ err.into_diagnostic(&self.span_diagnostic)
}
pub fn emit_err<'a>(&'a self, err: impl SessionDiagnostic<'a>) -> ErrorGuaranteed {
&'a self,
warning: impl SessionDiagnostic<'a, ()>,
) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ()> {
- warning.into_diagnostic(self)
+ warning.into_diagnostic(&self.span_diagnostic)
}
pub fn emit_warning<'a>(&'a self, warning: impl SessionDiagnostic<'a, ()>) {
&'a self,
fatal: impl SessionDiagnostic<'a, !>,
) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a, !> {
- fatal.into_diagnostic(self)
+ fatal.into_diagnostic(&self.span_diagnostic)
}
pub fn emit_fatal<'a>(&'a self, fatal: impl SessionDiagnostic<'a, !>) -> ! {
use rustc_errors::registry::Registry;
use rustc_errors::{
error_code, fallback_fluent_bundle, DiagnosticBuilder, DiagnosticId, DiagnosticMessage,
- EmissionGuarantee, ErrorGuaranteed, FluentBundle, LazyFallbackBundle, MultiSpan,
+ EmissionGuarantee, ErrorGuaranteed, FluentBundle, Handler, LazyFallbackBundle, MultiSpan,
};
use rustc_macros::HashStable_Generic;
pub use rustc_span::def_id::StableCrateId;
/// `#[derive(SessionDiagnostic)]` -- see [rustc_macros::SessionDiagnostic].
#[rustc_diagnostic_item = "SessionDiagnostic"]
pub trait SessionDiagnostic<'a, T: EmissionGuarantee = ErrorGuaranteed> {
- /// Write out as a diagnostic out of `sess`.
+ /// Write out as a diagnostic out of `Handler`.
#[must_use]
- fn into_diagnostic(self, sess: &'a ParseSess) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a, T>;
+ fn into_diagnostic(self, handler: &'a Handler) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a, T>;
}
impl Session {
-use rustc_errors::{fluent, ErrorGuaranteed};
+use rustc_errors::{fluent, ErrorGuaranteed, Handler};
use rustc_macros::SessionDiagnostic;
use rustc_middle::ty::{PolyTraitRef, Ty, Unevaluated};
-use rustc_session::{parse::ParseSess, Limit, SessionDiagnostic};
+use rustc_session::{Limit, SessionDiagnostic};
use rustc_span::{Span, Symbol};
#[derive(SessionDiagnostic)]
impl SessionDiagnostic<'_> for NegativePositiveConflict<'_> {
fn into_diagnostic(
self,
- sess: &ParseSess,
+ handler: &Handler,
) -> rustc_errors::DiagnosticBuilder<'_, ErrorGuaranteed> {
- let mut diag = sess.struct_err(fluent::trait_selection::negative_positive_conflict);
+ let mut diag = handler.struct_err(fluent::trait_selection::negative_positive_conflict);
diag.set_arg("trait_desc", self.trait_desc);
diag.set_arg(
"self_desc",
self.tcx().sess.emit_err(MissingTypeParams {
span,
def_span: self.tcx().def_span(def_id),
+ span_snippet: self.tcx().sess.source_map().span_to_snippet(span).ok(),
missing_type_params,
empty_generic_args,
});
//! Errors emitted by typeck.
-use rustc_errors::{error_code, Applicability, DiagnosticBuilder, ErrorGuaranteed};
+use rustc_errors::{error_code, Applicability, DiagnosticBuilder, ErrorGuaranteed, Handler};
use rustc_macros::{LintDiagnostic, SessionDiagnostic, SessionSubdiagnostic};
use rustc_middle::ty::Ty;
-use rustc_session::{parse::ParseSess, SessionDiagnostic};
+use rustc_session::SessionDiagnostic;
use rustc_span::{symbol::Ident, Span, Symbol};
#[derive(SessionDiagnostic)]
pub struct MissingTypeParams {
pub span: Span,
pub def_span: Span,
+ pub span_snippet: Option<String>,
pub missing_type_params: Vec<Symbol>,
pub empty_generic_args: bool,
}
// Manual implementation of `SessionDiagnostic` to be able to call `span_to_snippet`.
impl<'a> SessionDiagnostic<'a> for MissingTypeParams {
- fn into_diagnostic(self, sess: &'a ParseSess) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ErrorGuaranteed> {
- let mut err = sess.span_diagnostic.struct_span_err_with_code(
+ fn into_diagnostic(self, handler: &'a Handler) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ErrorGuaranteed> {
+ let mut err = handler.struct_span_err_with_code(
self.span,
rustc_errors::fluent::typeck::missing_type_params,
error_code!(E0393),
err.span_label(self.def_span, rustc_errors::fluent::typeck::label);
let mut suggested = false;
- if let (Ok(snippet), true) = (
- sess.source_map().span_to_snippet(self.span),
- // Don't suggest setting the type params if there are some already: the order is
- // tricky to get right and the user will already know what the syntax is.
- self.empty_generic_args,
- ) {
+ // Don't suggest setting the type params if there are some already: the order is
+ // tricky to get right and the user will already know what the syntax is.
+ if let Some(snippet) = self.span_snippet && self.empty_generic_args {
if snippet.ends_with('>') {
// The user wrote `Trait<'a, T>` or similar. To provide an accurate suggestion
// we would have to preserve the right order. For now, as clearly the user is
#[rustc_const_unstable(feature = "const_convert", issue = "88674")]
impl<T> const From<T> for T {
/// Returns the argument unchanged.
+ #[inline(always)]
fn from(t: T) -> T {
t
}
mem::size_of::<c::FILE_ATTRIBUTE_TAG_INFO>().try_into().unwrap(),
))?;
if attr_tag.FileAttributes & c::FILE_ATTRIBUTE_REPARSE_POINT != 0 {
- reparse_tag = attr_tag.ReparseTag;
+ attr.reparse_tag = attr_tag.ReparseTag;
}
}
Ok(attr)
) - visited
elif item["kind"] == "variant":
if item["inner"]["variant_kind"] == "tuple":
- for ty in item["inner"]["variant_inner"]:
- check_type(ty)
+ for field_id in filter(None, item["inner"]["variant_inner"]):
+ work_list.add(field_id)
elif item["inner"]["variant_kind"] == "struct":
- work_list |= set(item["inner"]["variant_inner"]) - visited
+ work_list |= set(item["inner"]["variant_inner"]["fields"]) - visited
elif item["kind"] in ("function", "method"):
check_generics(item["inner"]["generics"])
check_decl(item["inner"]["decl"])
use clean::Variant::*;
match variant {
CLike(disr) => Variant::Plain(disr.map(|disr| disr.into_tcx(tcx))),
- Tuple(fields) => Variant::Tuple(
- fields
- .into_iter()
- .filter_map(|f| match *f.kind {
- clean::StructFieldItem(ty) => Some(ty.into_tcx(tcx)),
- clean::StrippedItem(_) => None,
- _ => unreachable!(),
- })
- .collect(),
- ),
- Struct(s) => Variant::Struct(ids(s.fields, tcx)),
+ Tuple(fields) => Variant::Tuple(ids_keeping_stripped(fields, tcx)),
+ Struct(s) => Variant::Struct {
+ fields_stripped: s.has_stripped_entries(),
+ fields: ids(s.fields, tcx),
+ },
}
}
}
.map(|i| from_item_id_with_name(i.item_id, tcx, i.name))
.collect()
}
+
+fn ids_keeping_stripped(
+ items: impl IntoIterator<Item = clean::Item>,
+ tcx: TyCtxt<'_>,
+) -> Vec<Option<Id>> {
+ items
+ .into_iter()
+ .map(|i| {
+ if !i.is_stripped() && !i.is_keyword() {
+ Some(from_item_id_with_name(i.item_id, tcx, i.name))
+ } else {
+ None
+ }
+ })
+ .collect()
+}
use serde::{Deserialize, Serialize};
/// rustdoc format-version.
-pub const FORMAT_VERSION: u32 = 19;
+pub const FORMAT_VERSION: u32 = 20;
/// A `Crate` is the root of the emitted JSON blob. It contains all type/documentation information
/// about the language items in the local crate, as well as info about external items to allow
#[serde(rename_all = "snake_case")]
#[serde(tag = "variant_kind", content = "variant_inner")]
pub enum Variant {
+ /// A variant with no parentheses, and possible discriminant.
+ ///
+ /// ```rust
+ /// enum Demo {
+ /// PlainVariant,
+ /// PlainWithDiscriminant = 1,
+ /// }
+ /// ```
Plain(Option<Discriminant>),
- Tuple(Vec<Type>),
- Struct(Vec<Id>),
+ /// A variant with unnamed fields.
+ ///
+ /// Unlike most of json, `#[doc(hidden)]` fields will be given as `None`
+ /// instead of being ommited, because order matters.
+ ///
+ /// ```rust
+ /// enum Demo {
+ /// TupleVariant(i32),
+ /// EmptyTupleVariant(),
+ /// }
+ /// ```
+ Tuple(Vec<Option<Id>>),
+ /// A variant with named fields.
+ ///
+ /// ```rust
+ /// enum Demo {
+ /// StructVariant { x: i32 },
+ /// EmptyStructVariant {},
+ /// }
+ /// ```
+ Struct { fields: Vec<Id>, fields_stripped: bool },
}
#[derive(Clone, Debug, PartialEq, Eq, Hash, Serialize, Deserialize)]
--- /dev/null
+// revisions: rpass1 rpass2
+
+pub fn foo() {
+ bar();
+ baz::<()>();
+}
+
+fn bar()
+where
+ <() as Table>::AllColumns:,
+{
+}
+
+fn baz<W>()
+where
+ W: AsQuery,
+ <W as AsQuery>::Query:,
+{
+}
+
+trait AsQuery {
+ type Query;
+}
+
+trait UnimplementedTrait {}
+
+impl<T> AsQuery for T
+where
+ T: UnimplementedTrait,
+{
+ type Query = ();
+}
+
+struct Wrapper<Expr>(Expr);
+
+impl<Ret> AsQuery for Wrapper<Ret> {
+ type Query = ();
+}
+
+impl AsQuery for ()
+where
+ Wrapper<<() as Table>::AllColumns>: AsQuery,
+{
+ type Query = ();
+}
+
+trait Table {
+ type AllColumns;
+}
+
+#[cfg(rpass1)]
+impl Table for () {
+ type AllColumns = Checksum1;
+}
+#[cfg(rpass1)]
+struct Checksum1;
+
+#[cfg(rpass2)]
+impl Table for () {
+ type AllColumns = Checksum2;
+}
+#[cfg(rpass2)]
+struct Checksum2;
+
+fn main() {}
+++ /dev/null
-// Regression test for <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/100529>.
-
-#![no_core]
-#![feature(no_core)]
-
-// @has "$.index[*][?(@.name=='ParseError')]"
-// @has "$.index[*][?(@.name=='UnexpectedEndTag')]"
-// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='UnexpectedEndTag')].inner.variant_kind" '"tuple"'
-// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='UnexpectedEndTag')].inner.variant_inner" []
-
-pub enum ParseError {
- UnexpectedEndTag(#[doc(hidden)] u32),
-}
--- /dev/null
+// Regression test for <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/100529>.
+
+#![no_core]
+#![feature(no_core)]
+
+// @has "$.index[*][?(@.name=='ParseError')]"
+// @has "$.index[*][?(@.name=='UnexpectedEndTag')]"
+// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='UnexpectedEndTag')].inner.variant_kind" '"tuple"'
+// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='UnexpectedEndTag')].inner.variant_inner" [null]
+
+pub enum ParseError {
+ UnexpectedEndTag(#[doc(hidden)] u32),
+}
--- /dev/null
+// ignore-tidy-linelength
+
+#![feature(no_core)]
+#![no_core]
+
+pub enum Foo {
+ // @set Unit = "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Unit')].id"
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Unit')].inner.variant_kind" '"plain"'
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Unit')].inner.variant_inner" null
+ Unit,
+ // @set Named = "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Named')].id"
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Named')].inner.variant_kind" '"struct"'
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Named')].inner.variant_inner" '{"fields": [], "fields_stripped": false}'
+ Named {},
+ // @set Tuple = "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Tuple')].id"
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Tuple')].inner.variant_kind" '"tuple"'
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Tuple')].inner.variant_inner" []
+ Tuple(),
+ // @set NamedField = "$.index[*][?(@.name=='NamedField')].id"
+ // @set x = "$.index[*][?(@.name=='x' && @.kind=='struct_field')].id"
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='NamedField')].inner.variant_kind" '"struct"'
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='NamedField')].inner.variant_inner.fields[*]" $x
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='NamedField')].inner.variant_inner.fields_stripped" false
+ NamedField { x: i32 },
+ // @set TupleField = "$.index[*][?(@.name=='TupleField')].id"
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='TupleField')].inner.variant_kind" '"tuple"'
+ // @set tup_field = "$.index[*][?(@.name=='0' && @.kind=='struct_field')].id"
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='TupleField')].inner.variant_inner[*]" $tup_field
+ TupleField(i32),
+}
+
+// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Foo')].inner.variants[0]" $Unit
+// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Foo')].inner.variants[1]" $Named
+// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Foo')].inner.variants[2]" $Tuple
+// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Foo')].inner.variants[3]" $NamedField
+// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Foo')].inner.variants[4]" $TupleField
+// @count "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Foo')].inner.variants[*]" 5
--- /dev/null
+pub enum Foo {
+ Variant {
+ #[doc(hidden)]
+ a: i32,
+ // @set b = "$.index[*][?(@.name=='b')].id"
+ b: i32,
+ #[doc(hidden)]
+ x: i32,
+ // @set y = "$.index[*][?(@.name=='y')].id"
+ y: i32,
+ },
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Variant')].inner.variant_kind" '"struct"'
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Variant')].inner.variant_inner.fields_stripped" true
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Variant')].inner.variant_inner.fields[0]" $b
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Variant')].inner.variant_inner.fields[1]" $y
+ // @count "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Variant')].inner.variant_inner.fields[*]" 2
+}
--- /dev/null
+#![feature(no_core)]
+#![no_core]
+
+// @set 1.1.0 = "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='1.1.0')].id"
+// @set 2.1.0 = "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='2.1.0')].id"
+// @set 2.1.1 = "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='2.1.1')].id"
+// @set 2.2.1 = "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='2.2.1')].id"
+// @set 2.3.0 = "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='2.3.0')].id"
+// @set 3.1.1 = "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='3.1.1')].id"
+// @set 3.1.2 = "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='3.1.2')].id"
+// @set 3.2.0 = "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='3.2.0')].id"
+// @set 3.2.2 = "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='3.2.2')].id"
+// @set 3.3.0 = "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='3.3.0')].id"
+// @set 3.3.1 = "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='3.3.1')].id"
+
+pub enum EnumWithStrippedTupleVariants {
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='None')].inner.variant_kind" '"tuple"'
+ // @count "$.index[*][?(@.name=='None')].inner.variant_inner[*]" 0
+ None(),
+
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='One')].inner.variant_kind" '"tuple"'
+ // @count "$.index[*][?(@.name=='One')].inner.variant_inner[*]" 1
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='One')].inner.variant_inner[0]" $1.1.0
+ One(/** 1.1.0*/ bool),
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='OneHidden')].inner.variant_kind" '"tuple"'
+ // @count "$.index[*][?(@.name=='OneHidden')].inner.variant_inner[*]" 1
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='OneHidden')].inner.variant_inner[0]" null
+ OneHidden(#[doc(hidden)] bool),
+
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Two')].inner.variant_kind" '"tuple"'
+ // @count "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Two')].inner.variant_inner[*]" 2
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Two')].inner.variant_inner[0]" $2.1.0
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Two')].inner.variant_inner[1]" $2.1.1
+ Two(/** 2.1.0*/ bool, /** 2.1.1*/ bool),
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='TwoLeftHidden')].inner.variant_kind" '"tuple"'
+ // @count "$.index[*][?(@.name=='TwoLeftHidden')].inner.variant_inner[*]" 2
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='TwoLeftHidden')].inner.variant_inner[0]" null
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='TwoLeftHidden')].inner.variant_inner[1]" $2.2.1
+ TwoLeftHidden(#[doc(hidden)] bool, /** 2.2.1*/ bool),
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='TwoRightHidden')].inner.variant_kind" '"tuple"'
+ // @count "$.index[*][?(@.name=='TwoRightHidden')].inner.variant_inner[*]" 2
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='TwoRightHidden')].inner.variant_inner[0]" $2.3.0
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='TwoRightHidden')].inner.variant_inner[1]" null
+ TwoRightHidden(/** 2.3.0*/ bool, #[doc(hidden)] bool),
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='TwoBothHidden')].inner.variant_kind" '"tuple"'
+ // @count "$.index[*][?(@.name=='TwoBothHidden')].inner.variant_inner[*]" 2
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='TwoBothHidden')].inner.variant_inner[0]" null
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='TwoBothHidden')].inner.variant_inner[1]" null
+ TwoBothHidden(#[doc(hidden)] bool, #[doc(hidden)] bool),
+
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Three1')].inner.variant_kind" '"tuple"'
+ // @count "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Three1')].inner.variant_inner[*]" 3
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Three1')].inner.variant_inner[0]" null
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Three1')].inner.variant_inner[1]" $3.1.1
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Three1')].inner.variant_inner[2]" $3.1.2
+ Three1(#[doc(hidden)] bool, /** 3.1.1*/ bool, /** 3.1.2*/ bool),
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Three2')].inner.variant_kind" '"tuple"'
+ // @count "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Three2')].inner.variant_inner[*]" 3
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Three2')].inner.variant_inner[0]" $3.2.0
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Three2')].inner.variant_inner[1]" null
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Three2')].inner.variant_inner[2]" $3.2.2
+ Three2(/** 3.2.0*/ bool, #[doc(hidden)] bool, /** 3.2.2*/ bool),
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Three3')].inner.variant_kind" '"tuple"'
+ // @count "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Three3')].inner.variant_inner[*]" 3
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Three3')].inner.variant_inner[0]" $3.3.0
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Three3')].inner.variant_inner[1]" $3.3.1
+ // @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Three3')].inner.variant_inner[2]" null
+ Three3(/** 3.3.0*/ bool, /** 3.3.1*/ bool, #[doc(hidden)] bool),
+}
+
+
+// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='1.1.0')].name" '"0"'
+// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='2.1.0')].name" '"0"'
+// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='2.1.1')].name" '"1"'
+// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='2.2.1')].name" '"1"'
+// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='2.3.0')].name" '"0"'
+// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='3.1.1')].name" '"1"'
+// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='3.1.2')].name" '"2"'
+// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='3.2.0')].name" '"0"'
+// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='3.2.2')].name" '"2"'
+// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='3.3.0')].name" '"0"'
+// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='3.3.1')].name" '"1"'
+
+// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='1.1.0')].inner" '{"kind": "primitive", "inner": "bool"}'
+// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='2.1.0')].inner" '{"kind": "primitive", "inner": "bool"}'
+// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='2.1.1')].inner" '{"kind": "primitive", "inner": "bool"}'
+// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='2.2.1')].inner" '{"kind": "primitive", "inner": "bool"}'
+// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='2.3.0')].inner" '{"kind": "primitive", "inner": "bool"}'
+// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='3.1.1')].inner" '{"kind": "primitive", "inner": "bool"}'
+// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='3.1.2')].inner" '{"kind": "primitive", "inner": "bool"}'
+// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='3.2.0')].inner" '{"kind": "primitive", "inner": "bool"}'
+// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='3.2.2')].inner" '{"kind": "primitive", "inner": "bool"}'
+// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='3.3.0')].inner" '{"kind": "primitive", "inner": "bool"}'
+// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='3.3.1')].inner" '{"kind": "primitive", "inner": "bool"}'
extern crate rustc_session;
extern crate rustc_span;
-use rustc_errors::{AddSubdiagnostic, Diagnostic, DiagnosticBuilder, ErrorGuaranteed, fluent};
+use rustc_errors::{
+ AddSubdiagnostic, Diagnostic, DiagnosticBuilder, ErrorGuaranteed, Handler, fluent
+};
use rustc_macros::{SessionDiagnostic, SessionSubdiagnostic};
-use rustc_session::{parse::ParseSess, SessionDiagnostic};
+use rustc_session::SessionDiagnostic;
use rustc_span::Span;
#[derive(SessionDiagnostic)]
pub struct UntranslatableInSessionDiagnostic;
impl<'a> SessionDiagnostic<'a, ErrorGuaranteed> for UntranslatableInSessionDiagnostic {
- fn into_diagnostic(self, sess: &'a ParseSess) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ErrorGuaranteed> {
- sess.struct_err("untranslatable diagnostic")
+ fn into_diagnostic(self, handler: &'a Handler) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ErrorGuaranteed> {
+ handler.struct_err("untranslatable diagnostic")
//~^ ERROR diagnostics should be created using translatable messages
}
}
pub struct TranslatableInSessionDiagnostic;
impl<'a> SessionDiagnostic<'a, ErrorGuaranteed> for TranslatableInSessionDiagnostic {
- fn into_diagnostic(self, sess: &'a ParseSess) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ErrorGuaranteed> {
- sess.struct_err(fluent::parser::expect_path)
+ fn into_diagnostic(self, handler: &'a Handler) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ErrorGuaranteed> {
+ handler.struct_err(fluent::parser::expect_path)
}
}
}
}
-pub fn make_diagnostics<'a>(sess: &'a ParseSess) {
- let _diag = sess.struct_err(fluent::parser::expect_path);
+pub fn make_diagnostics<'a>(handler: &'a Handler) {
+ let _diag = handler.struct_err(fluent::parser::expect_path);
//~^ ERROR diagnostics should only be created in `SessionDiagnostic`/`AddSubdiagnostic` impls
- let _diag = sess.struct_err("untranslatable diagnostic");
+ let _diag = handler.struct_err("untranslatable diagnostic");
//~^ ERROR diagnostics should only be created in `SessionDiagnostic`/`AddSubdiagnostic` impls
//~^^ ERROR diagnostics should be created using translatable messages
}
// Check that `rustc_lint_diagnostics`-annotated functions aren't themselves linted.
#[rustc_lint_diagnostics]
-pub fn skipped_because_of_annotation<'a>(sess: &'a ParseSess) {
- let _diag = sess.struct_err("untranslatable diagnostic"); // okay!
+pub fn skipped_because_of_annotation<'a>(handler: &'a Handler) {
+ let _diag = handler.struct_err("untranslatable diagnostic"); // okay!
}
error: diagnostics should be created using translatable messages
- --> $DIR/diagnostics.rs:37:14
+ --> $DIR/diagnostics.rs:39:17
|
-LL | sess.struct_err("untranslatable diagnostic")
- | ^^^^^^^^^^
+LL | handler.struct_err("untranslatable diagnostic")
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/diagnostics.rs:6:9
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: diagnostics should be created using translatable messages
- --> $DIR/diagnostics.rs:54:14
+ --> $DIR/diagnostics.rs:56:14
|
LL | diag.note("untranslatable diagnostic");
| ^^^^
error: diagnostics should only be created in `SessionDiagnostic`/`AddSubdiagnostic` impls
- --> $DIR/diagnostics.rs:68:22
+ --> $DIR/diagnostics.rs:70:25
|
-LL | let _diag = sess.struct_err(fluent::parser::expect_path);
- | ^^^^^^^^^^
+LL | let _diag = handler.struct_err(fluent::parser::expect_path);
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/diagnostics.rs:7:9
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: diagnostics should only be created in `SessionDiagnostic`/`AddSubdiagnostic` impls
- --> $DIR/diagnostics.rs:71:22
+ --> $DIR/diagnostics.rs:73:25
|
-LL | let _diag = sess.struct_err("untranslatable diagnostic");
- | ^^^^^^^^^^
+LL | let _diag = handler.struct_err("untranslatable diagnostic");
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^
error: diagnostics should be created using translatable messages
- --> $DIR/diagnostics.rs:71:22
+ --> $DIR/diagnostics.rs:73:25
|
-LL | let _diag = sess.struct_err("untranslatable diagnostic");
- | ^^^^^^^^^^
+LL | let _diag = handler.struct_err("untranslatable diagnostic");
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^
error: aborting due to 5 previous errors
let _a = || { match l1 { L1::A => (), L1::B => () } };
// (except if the match is already non-exhaustive)
let _b = || { match l1 { L1::A => () } };
- //~^ ERROR: non-exhaustive patterns: `B` not covered [E0004]
+ //~^ ERROR: non-exhaustive patterns: `L1::B` not covered [E0004]
// l2 should not be captured as it is a non-exhaustive SingleVariant
// defined in this crate
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `B` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `L1::B` not covered
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-match.rs:26:25
|
LL | let _b = || { match l1 { L1::A => () } };
- | ^^ pattern `B` not covered
+ | ^^ pattern `L1::B` not covered
|
note: `L1` defined here
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-match.rs:12:14
= note: the matched value is of type `L1`
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
-LL | let _b = || { match l1 { L1::A => (), B => todo!() } };
- | ++++++++++++++
+LL | let _b = || { match l1 { L1::A => (), L1::B => todo!() } };
+ | ++++++++++++++++++
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: type `E1` is non-empty
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-match.rs:37:25
fn transmute<T, U>(t: T) -> U {
let Helper::U(u) = Helper::T(t, []);
- //~^ ERROR refutable pattern in local binding: `T(_, _)` not covered
+ //~^ ERROR refutable pattern in local binding: `Helper::T(_, _)` not covered
u
}
-error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `T(_, _)` not covered
+error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `Helper::T(_, _)` not covered
--> $DIR/empty-never-array.rs:10:9
|
LL | let Helper::U(u) = Helper::T(t, []);
- | ^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `T(_, _)` not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `Helper::T(_, _)` not covered
|
= note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant
= note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `HastaLaVistaBaby` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Terminator::HastaLaVistaBaby` not covered
--> $DIR/E0004.rs:9:11
|
LL | match x {
- | ^ pattern `HastaLaVistaBaby` not covered
+ | ^ pattern `Terminator::HastaLaVistaBaby` not covered
|
note: `Terminator` defined here
--> $DIR/E0004.rs:2:5
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ Terminator::TalkToMyHand => {}
-LL + HastaLaVistaBaby => todo!()
+LL + Terminator::HastaLaVistaBaby => todo!()
|
error: aborting due to previous error
Foo::A => {}
Foo::B => {}
}
- //~^^^^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `C` not covered
+ //~^^^^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `Foo::C` not covered
match Foo::A {
Foo::A => {}
= note: see issue #89554 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/89554> for more information
= help: add `#![feature(non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns_lint)]` to the crate attributes to enable
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `C` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Foo::C` not covered
--> $DIR/feature-gate-non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns_lint.rs:20:11
|
LL | match Foo::A {
- | ^^^^^^ pattern `C` not covered
+ | ^^^^^^ pattern `Foo::C` not covered
|
note: `Foo` defined here
--> $DIR/feature-gate-non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns_lint.rs:12:15
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ Foo::B => {}
-LL + C => todo!()
+LL + Foo::C => todo!()
|
error: aborting due to previous error; 10 warnings emitted
--- /dev/null
+error[E0277]: the trait bound `(): AsRef<(dyn for<'r> Fn(&'r ()) + 'static)>` is not satisfied
+ --> $DIR/generic-with-implicit-hrtb-without-dyn.rs:6:13
+ |
+LL | fn ice() -> impl AsRef<Fn(&())> {
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `AsRef<(dyn for<'r> Fn(&'r ()) + 'static)>` is not implemented for `()`
+
+error: aborting due to previous error
+
+For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0277`.
--- /dev/null
+error[E0782]: trait objects must include the `dyn` keyword
+ --> $DIR/generic-with-implicit-hrtb-without-dyn.rs:6:24
+ |
+LL | fn ice() -> impl AsRef<Fn(&())> {
+ | ^^^^^^^
+ |
+help: add `dyn` keyword before this trait
+ |
+LL - fn ice() -> impl AsRef<Fn(&())> {
+LL + fn ice() -> impl AsRef<dyn Fn(&())> {
+ |
+
+error[E0277]: the trait bound `(): AsRef<(dyn for<'r> Fn(&'r ()) + 'static)>` is not satisfied
+ --> $DIR/generic-with-implicit-hrtb-without-dyn.rs:6:13
+ |
+LL | fn ice() -> impl AsRef<Fn(&())> {
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `AsRef<(dyn for<'r> Fn(&'r ()) + 'static)>` is not implemented for `()`
+
+error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
+
+Some errors have detailed explanations: E0277, E0782.
+For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0277`.
--- /dev/null
+// revisions: edition2015 edition2021
+//[edition2021]edition:2021
+
+#![allow(warnings)]
+
+fn ice() -> impl AsRef<Fn(&())> {
+ //~^ ERROR: the trait bound `(): AsRef<(dyn for<'r> Fn(&'r ()) + 'static)>` is not satisfied [E0277]
+ //[edition2021]~| ERROR: trait objects must include the `dyn` keyword [E0782]
+ todo!()
+}
+
+fn main() {}
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `B` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Enum::B` not covered
--> $DIR/issue-94866.rs:10:11
|
LL | match Enum::A {
- | ^^^^^^^ pattern `B` not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^ pattern `Enum::B` not covered
|
note: `Enum` defined here
--> $DIR/issue-94866.rs:7:16
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ Enum::A => m!(),
-LL + B => todo!()
+LL + Enum::B => todo!()
|
error: aborting due to previous error
|
LL | #[repr(nothing)]
| ^^^^^^^
+ |
+ = help: valid reprs are `C`, `align`, `packed`, `transparent`, `simd`, `i8`, `u8`, `i16`, `u16`, `i32`, `u32`, `i64`, `u64`, `i128`, `u128`, `isize`, `usize`
error[E0552]: unrecognized representation hint
--> $DIR/issue-43988.rs:18:12
|
LL | #[repr(something_not_real)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+ |
+ = help: valid reprs are `C`, `align`, `packed`, `transparent`, `simd`, `i8`, `u8`, `i16`, `u16`, `i32`, `u32`, `i64`, `u64`, `i128`, `u128`, `isize`, `usize`
error[E0518]: attribute should be applied to function or closure
--> $DIR/issue-43988.rs:30:5
--- /dev/null
+fn no_restriction<T>(x: &()) -> &() {
+ with_restriction::<T>(x) //~ ERROR the parameter type `T` may not live long enough
+}
+
+fn with_restriction<'b, T: 'b>(x: &'b ()) -> &'b () {
+ x
+}
+
+fn main() {}
--- /dev/null
+error[E0311]: the parameter type `T` may not live long enough
+ --> $DIR/suggest-introducing-and-adding-missing-lifetime.rs:2:5
+ |
+LL | with_restriction::<T>(x)
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+ |
+note: the parameter type `T` must be valid for the anonymous lifetime defined here...
+ --> $DIR/suggest-introducing-and-adding-missing-lifetime.rs:1:25
+ |
+LL | fn no_restriction<T>(x: &()) -> &() {
+ | ^^^
+note: ...so that the type `T` will meet its required lifetime bounds
+ --> $DIR/suggest-introducing-and-adding-missing-lifetime.rs:2:5
+ |
+LL | with_restriction::<T>(x)
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+help: consider adding an explicit lifetime bound...
+ |
+LL | fn no_restriction<'a, T: 'a>(x: &()) -> &() {
+ | +++ ++++
+
+error: aborting due to previous error
+
match l { L::A => (), L::B => () };
// (except if the match is already non-exhaustive)
match l { L::A => () };
- //~^ ERROR: non-exhaustive patterns: `B` not covered [E0004]
+ //~^ ERROR: non-exhaustive patterns: `L::B` not covered [E0004]
// E1 is not visibly uninhabited from here
let (e1, e2) = bar();
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `B` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `L::B` not covered
--> $DIR/match_non_exhaustive.rs:23:11
|
LL | match l { L::A => () };
- | ^ pattern `B` not covered
+ | ^ pattern `L::B` not covered
|
note: `L` defined here
--> $DIR/match_non_exhaustive.rs:10:13
= note: the matched value is of type `L`
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
-LL | match l { L::A => (), B => todo!() };
- | ++++++++++++++
+LL | match l { L::A => (), L::B => todo!() };
+ | +++++++++++++++++
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: type `E1` is non-empty
--> $DIR/match_non_exhaustive.rs:28:11
--- /dev/null
+struct Foo {
+ foo: i32;
+ //~^ ERROR struct fields are separated by `,`
+}
+
+union Bar { //~ ERROR
+ foo: i32;
+ //~^ ERROR union fields are separated by `,`
+}
+
+enum Baz {
+ Qux { foo: i32; }
+ //~^ ERROR struct fields are separated by `,`
+}
+
+fn main() {}
--- /dev/null
+error: struct fields are separated by `,`
+ --> $DIR/recover-field-semi.rs:2:13
+ |
+LL | foo: i32;
+ | ^ help: replace `;` with `,`
+
+error: union fields are separated by `,`
+ --> $DIR/recover-field-semi.rs:7:13
+ |
+LL | foo: i32;
+ | ^ help: replace `;` with `,`
+
+error: struct fields are separated by `,`
+ --> $DIR/recover-field-semi.rs:12:19
+ |
+LL | Qux { foo: i32; }
+ | ^ help: replace `;` with `,`
+
+error: unions cannot have zero fields
+ --> $DIR/recover-field-semi.rs:6:1
+ |
+LL | / union Bar {
+LL | | foo: i32;
+LL | |
+LL | | }
+ | |_^
+
+error: aborting due to 4 previous errors
+
struct S {
bar: ();
- //~^ ERROR expected `,`, or `}`, found `;`
+ //~^ ERROR struct fields are separated by `,`
}
fn main() {}
-error: expected `,`, or `}`, found `;`
+error: struct fields are separated by `,`
--> $DIR/removed-syntax-field-semicolon.rs:2:12
|
LL | bar: ();
- | ^
+ | ^ help: replace `;` with `,`
error: aborting due to previous error
HiddenEnum::A => {}
HiddenEnum::C => {}
}
- //~^^^^ non-exhaustive patterns: `B` not covered
+ //~^^^^ non-exhaustive patterns: `HiddenEnum::B` not covered
match HiddenEnum::A {
HiddenEnum::A => {}
}
- //~^^^ non-exhaustive patterns: `B` and `_` not covered
+ //~^^^ non-exhaustive patterns: `HiddenEnum::B` and `_` not covered
match None {
None => {}
Some(HiddenEnum::A) => {}
}
- //~^^^^ non-exhaustive patterns: `Some(B)` and `Some(_)` not covered
+ //~^^^^ non-exhaustive patterns: `Some(HiddenEnum::B)` and `Some(_)` not covered
match InCrate::A {
InCrate::A => {}
InCrate::B => {}
}
- //~^^^^ non-exhaustive patterns: `C` not covered
+ //~^^^^ non-exhaustive patterns: `InCrate::C` not covered
}
LL + _ => todo!()
|
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `B` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `HiddenEnum::B` not covered
--> $DIR/doc-hidden-non-exhaustive.rs:21:11
|
LL | match HiddenEnum::A {
- | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `B` not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `HiddenEnum::B` not covered
|
note: `HiddenEnum` defined here
--> $DIR/auxiliary/hidden.rs:3:5
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ HiddenEnum::C => {}
-LL + B => todo!()
+LL + HiddenEnum::B => todo!()
|
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `B` and `_` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `HiddenEnum::B` and `_` not covered
--> $DIR/doc-hidden-non-exhaustive.rs:27:11
|
LL | match HiddenEnum::A {
- | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `B` and `_` not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `HiddenEnum::B` and `_` not covered
|
note: `HiddenEnum` defined here
--> $DIR/auxiliary/hidden.rs:3:5
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL ~ HiddenEnum::A => {}
-LL + B | _ => todo!()
+LL + HiddenEnum::B | _ => todo!()
|
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Some(B)` and `Some(_)` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Some(HiddenEnum::B)` and `Some(_)` not covered
--> $DIR/doc-hidden-non-exhaustive.rs:32:11
|
LL | match None {
- | ^^^^ patterns `Some(B)` and `Some(_)` not covered
+ | ^^^^ patterns `Some(HiddenEnum::B)` and `Some(_)` not covered
|
note: `Option<HiddenEnum>` defined here
--> $SRC_DIR/core/src/option.rs:LL:COL
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL ~ Some(HiddenEnum::A) => {}
-LL + Some(B) | Some(_) => todo!()
+LL + Some(HiddenEnum::B) | Some(_) => todo!()
|
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `C` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `InCrate::C` not covered
--> $DIR/doc-hidden-non-exhaustive.rs:38:11
|
LL | match InCrate::A {
- | ^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `C` not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `InCrate::C` not covered
|
note: `InCrate` defined here
--> $DIR/doc-hidden-non-exhaustive.rs:11:5
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ InCrate::B => {}
-LL + C => todo!()
+LL + InCrate::C => todo!()
|
error: aborting due to 5 previous errors
= note: the matched value is of type `NonEmptyUnion2`
= help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Foo(_)` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(_)` not covered
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:83:20
|
LL | match_no_arms!(NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(true));
- | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `Foo(_)` not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(_)` not covered
|
note: `NonEmptyEnum1` defined here
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:24:5
= note: the matched value is of type `NonEmptyEnum1`
= help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Foo(_)` and `Bar` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(_)` and `NonEmptyEnum2::Bar` not covered
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:84:20
|
LL | match_no_arms!(NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(true));
- | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `Foo(_)` and `Bar` not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(_)` and `NonEmptyEnum2::Bar` not covered
|
note: `NonEmptyEnum2` defined here
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:27:5
= note: the matched value is of type `NonEmptyEnum2`
= help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or multiple match arms
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `V1`, `V2`, `V3` and 2 more not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `NonEmptyEnum5::V1`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V2`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V3` and 2 more not covered
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:85:20
|
LL | match_no_arms!(NonEmptyEnum5::V1);
- | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `V1`, `V2`, `V3` and 2 more not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `NonEmptyEnum5::V1`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V2`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V3` and 2 more not covered
|
note: `NonEmptyEnum5` defined here
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:30:6
LL + NonEmptyUnion2 { .. } => todo!()
|
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Foo(_)` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(_)` not covered
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:92:24
|
LL | match_guarded_arm!(NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(true));
- | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `Foo(_)` not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(_)` not covered
|
note: `NonEmptyEnum1` defined here
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:24:5
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ _ if false => {}
-LL + Foo(_) => todo!()
+LL + NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(_) => todo!()
|
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Foo(_)` and `Bar` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(_)` and `NonEmptyEnum2::Bar` not covered
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:93:24
|
LL | match_guarded_arm!(NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(true));
- | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `Foo(_)` and `Bar` not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(_)` and `NonEmptyEnum2::Bar` not covered
|
note: `NonEmptyEnum2` defined here
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:27:5
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL ~ _ if false => {}
-LL + Foo(_) | Bar => todo!()
+LL + NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(_) | NonEmptyEnum2::Bar => todo!()
|
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `V1`, `V2`, `V3` and 2 more not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `NonEmptyEnum5::V1`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V2`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V3` and 2 more not covered
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:94:24
|
LL | match_guarded_arm!(NonEmptyEnum5::V1);
- | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `V1`, `V2`, `V3` and 2 more not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `NonEmptyEnum5::V1`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V2`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V3` and 2 more not covered
|
note: `NonEmptyEnum5` defined here
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:30:6
= note: the matched value is of type `NonEmptyUnion2`
= help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Foo(_)` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(_)` not covered
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:83:20
|
LL | match_no_arms!(NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(true));
- | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `Foo(_)` not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(_)` not covered
|
note: `NonEmptyEnum1` defined here
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:24:5
= note: the matched value is of type `NonEmptyEnum1`
= help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Foo(_)` and `Bar` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(_)` and `NonEmptyEnum2::Bar` not covered
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:84:20
|
LL | match_no_arms!(NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(true));
- | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `Foo(_)` and `Bar` not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(_)` and `NonEmptyEnum2::Bar` not covered
|
note: `NonEmptyEnum2` defined here
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:27:5
= note: the matched value is of type `NonEmptyEnum2`
= help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or multiple match arms
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `V1`, `V2`, `V3` and 2 more not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `NonEmptyEnum5::V1`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V2`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V3` and 2 more not covered
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:85:20
|
LL | match_no_arms!(NonEmptyEnum5::V1);
- | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `V1`, `V2`, `V3` and 2 more not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `NonEmptyEnum5::V1`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V2`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V3` and 2 more not covered
|
note: `NonEmptyEnum5` defined here
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:30:6
LL + NonEmptyUnion2 { .. } => todo!()
|
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Foo(_)` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(_)` not covered
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:92:24
|
LL | match_guarded_arm!(NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(true));
- | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `Foo(_)` not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(_)` not covered
|
note: `NonEmptyEnum1` defined here
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:24:5
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ _ if false => {}
-LL + Foo(_) => todo!()
+LL + NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(_) => todo!()
|
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Foo(_)` and `Bar` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(_)` and `NonEmptyEnum2::Bar` not covered
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:93:24
|
LL | match_guarded_arm!(NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(true));
- | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `Foo(_)` and `Bar` not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(_)` and `NonEmptyEnum2::Bar` not covered
|
note: `NonEmptyEnum2` defined here
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:27:5
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL ~ _ if false => {}
-LL + Foo(_) | Bar => todo!()
+LL + NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(_) | NonEmptyEnum2::Bar => todo!()
|
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `V1`, `V2`, `V3` and 2 more not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `NonEmptyEnum5::V1`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V2`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V3` and 2 more not covered
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:94:24
|
LL | match_guarded_arm!(NonEmptyEnum5::V1);
- | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `V1`, `V2`, `V3` and 2 more not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `NonEmptyEnum5::V1`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V2`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V3` and 2 more not covered
|
note: `NonEmptyEnum5` defined here
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:30:6
match_no_arms!(NonEmptyStruct2(true)); //~ ERROR type `NonEmptyStruct2` is non-empty
match_no_arms!((NonEmptyUnion1 { foo: () })); //~ ERROR type `NonEmptyUnion1` is non-empty
match_no_arms!((NonEmptyUnion2 { foo: () })); //~ ERROR type `NonEmptyUnion2` is non-empty
- match_no_arms!(NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(true)); //~ ERROR `Foo(_)` not covered
- match_no_arms!(NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(true)); //~ ERROR `Foo(_)` and `Bar` not covered
- match_no_arms!(NonEmptyEnum5::V1); //~ ERROR `V1`, `V2`, `V3` and 2 more not covered
+ match_no_arms!(NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(true)); //~ ERROR `NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(_)` not covered
+ match_no_arms!(NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(true)); //~ ERROR `NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(_)` and `NonEmptyEnum2::Bar` not covered
+ match_no_arms!(NonEmptyEnum5::V1); //~ ERROR `NonEmptyEnum5::V1`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V2`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V3` and 2 more not covered
match_guarded_arm!(0u8); //~ ERROR `_` not covered
match_guarded_arm!(NonEmptyStruct1); //~ ERROR `NonEmptyStruct1` not covered
match_guarded_arm!(NonEmptyStruct2(true)); //~ ERROR `NonEmptyStruct2(_)` not covered
match_guarded_arm!((NonEmptyUnion1 { foo: () })); //~ ERROR `NonEmptyUnion1 { .. }` not covered
match_guarded_arm!((NonEmptyUnion2 { foo: () })); //~ ERROR `NonEmptyUnion2 { .. }` not covered
- match_guarded_arm!(NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(true)); //~ ERROR `Foo(_)` not covered
- match_guarded_arm!(NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(true)); //~ ERROR `Foo(_)` and `Bar` not covered
- match_guarded_arm!(NonEmptyEnum5::V1); //~ ERROR `V1`, `V2`, `V3` and 2 more not covered
+ match_guarded_arm!(NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(true)); //~ ERROR `NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(_)` not covered
+ match_guarded_arm!(NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(true)); //~ ERROR `NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(_)` and `NonEmptyEnum2::Bar` not covered
+ match_guarded_arm!(NonEmptyEnum5::V1); //~ ERROR `NonEmptyEnum5::V1`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V2`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V3` and 2 more not covered
}
fn main() {
match (T::T1(()), V::V2(true)) {
- //~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `(T1(()), V2(_))` and `(T2(()), V1(_))` not covered
+ //~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `(T::T1(()), V::V2(_))` and `(T::T2(()), V::V1(_))` not covered
(T::T1(()), V::V1(i)) => (),
(T::T2(()), V::V2(b)) => (),
}
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `(T1(()), V2(_))` and `(T2(()), V1(_))` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `(T::T1(()), V::V2(_))` and `(T::T2(()), V::V1(_))` not covered
--> $DIR/issue-15129.rs:12:11
|
LL | match (T::T1(()), V::V2(true)) {
- | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `(T1(()), V2(_))` and `(T2(()), V1(_))` not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `(T::T1(()), V::V2(_))` and `(T::T2(()), V::V1(_))` not covered
|
= note: the matched value is of type `(T, V)`
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL ~ (T::T2(()), V::V2(b)) => (),
-LL ~ (T1(()), V2(_)) | (T2(()), V1(_)) => todo!(),
+LL ~ (T::T1(()), V::V2(_)) | (T::T2(()), V::V1(_)) => todo!(),
|
error: aborting due to previous error
fn main() {
let Thing::Foo(y) = Thing::Foo(1);
- //~^ ERROR refutable pattern in local binding: `Bar` and `Baz` not covered
+ //~^ ERROR refutable pattern in local binding: `Thing::Bar` and `Thing::Baz` not covered
}
-error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `Bar` and `Baz` not covered
+error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `Thing::Bar` and `Thing::Baz` not covered
--> $DIR/issue-31561.rs:8:9
|
LL | let Thing::Foo(y) = Thing::Foo(1);
- | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `Bar` and `Baz` not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `Thing::Bar` and `Thing::Baz` not covered
|
= note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant
= note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `(B, _)`, `(C, _)`, `(D, _)` and 2 more not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `(Enum::B, _)`, `(Enum::C, _)`, `(Enum::D, _)` and 2 more not covered
--> $DIR/issue-35609.rs:10:11
|
LL | match (A, ()) {
- | ^^^^^^^ patterns `(B, _)`, `(C, _)`, `(D, _)` and 2 more not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^ patterns `(Enum::B, _)`, `(Enum::C, _)`, `(Enum::D, _)` and 2 more not covered
|
= note: the matched value is of type `(Enum, ())`
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern as shown, or multiple match arms
LL + _ => todo!()
|
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `(_, B)`, `(_, C)`, `(_, D)` and 2 more not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `(_, Enum::B)`, `(_, Enum::C)`, `(_, Enum::D)` and 2 more not covered
--> $DIR/issue-35609.rs:14:11
|
LL | match (A, A) {
- | ^^^^^^ patterns `(_, B)`, `(_, C)`, `(_, D)` and 2 more not covered
+ | ^^^^^^ patterns `(_, Enum::B)`, `(_, Enum::C)`, `(_, Enum::D)` and 2 more not covered
|
= note: the matched value is of type `(Enum, Enum)`
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern as shown, or multiple match arms
LL + _ => todo!()
|
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `((B, _), _)`, `((C, _), _)`, `((D, _), _)` and 2 more not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `((Enum::B, _), _)`, `((Enum::C, _), _)`, `((Enum::D, _), _)` and 2 more not covered
--> $DIR/issue-35609.rs:18:11
|
LL | match ((A, ()), ()) {
- | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `((B, _), _)`, `((C, _), _)`, `((D, _), _)` and 2 more not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `((Enum::B, _), _)`, `((Enum::C, _), _)`, `((Enum::D, _), _)` and 2 more not covered
|
= note: the matched value is of type `((Enum, ()), ())`
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern as shown, or multiple match arms
LL + _ => todo!()
|
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `((B, _), _)`, `((C, _), _)`, `((D, _), _)` and 2 more not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `((Enum::B, _), _)`, `((Enum::C, _), _)`, `((Enum::D, _), _)` and 2 more not covered
--> $DIR/issue-35609.rs:22:11
|
LL | match ((A, ()), A) {
- | ^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `((B, _), _)`, `((C, _), _)`, `((D, _), _)` and 2 more not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `((Enum::B, _), _)`, `((Enum::C, _), _)`, `((Enum::D, _), _)` and 2 more not covered
|
= note: the matched value is of type `((Enum, ()), Enum)`
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern as shown, or multiple match arms
LL + _ => todo!()
|
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `((B, _), _)`, `((C, _), _)`, `((D, _), _)` and 2 more not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `((Enum::B, _), _)`, `((Enum::C, _), _)`, `((Enum::D, _), _)` and 2 more not covered
--> $DIR/issue-35609.rs:26:11
|
LL | match ((A, ()), ()) {
- | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `((B, _), _)`, `((C, _), _)`, `((D, _), _)` and 2 more not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `((Enum::B, _), _)`, `((Enum::C, _), _)`, `((Enum::D, _), _)` and 2 more not covered
|
= note: the matched value is of type `((Enum, ()), ())`
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern as shown, or multiple match arms
LL + _ => todo!()
|
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `S(B, _)`, `S(C, _)`, `S(D, _)` and 2 more not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `S(Enum::B, _)`, `S(Enum::C, _)`, `S(Enum::D, _)` and 2 more not covered
--> $DIR/issue-35609.rs:31:11
|
LL | match S(A, ()) {
- | ^^^^^^^^ patterns `S(B, _)`, `S(C, _)`, `S(D, _)` and 2 more not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^^ patterns `S(Enum::B, _)`, `S(Enum::C, _)`, `S(Enum::D, _)` and 2 more not covered
|
note: `S` defined here
--> $DIR/issue-35609.rs:6:8
LL + _ => todo!()
|
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Sd { x: B, .. }`, `Sd { x: C, .. }`, `Sd { x: D, .. }` and 2 more not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Sd { x: Enum::B, .. }`, `Sd { x: Enum::C, .. }`, `Sd { x: Enum::D, .. }` and 2 more not covered
--> $DIR/issue-35609.rs:35:11
|
LL | match (Sd { x: A, y: () }) {
- | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `Sd { x: B, .. }`, `Sd { x: C, .. }`, `Sd { x: D, .. }` and 2 more not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `Sd { x: Enum::B, .. }`, `Sd { x: Enum::C, .. }`, `Sd { x: Enum::D, .. }` and 2 more not covered
|
note: `Sd` defined here
--> $DIR/issue-35609.rs:7:8
LL + _ => todo!()
|
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Some(B)`, `Some(C)`, `Some(D)` and 2 more not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Some(Enum::B)`, `Some(Enum::C)`, `Some(Enum::D)` and 2 more not covered
--> $DIR/issue-35609.rs:39:11
|
LL | match Some(A) {
- | ^^^^^^^ patterns `Some(B)`, `Some(C)`, `Some(D)` and 2 more not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^ patterns `Some(Enum::B)`, `Some(Enum::C)`, `Some(Enum::D)` and 2 more not covered
|
note: `Option<Enum>` defined here
--> $SRC_DIR/core/src/option.rs:LL:COL
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Bar { bar: C, .. }`, `Bar { bar: D, .. }`, `Bar { bar: E, .. }` and 1 more not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Foo::Bar { bar: Bar::C, .. }`, `Foo::Bar { bar: Bar::D, .. }`, `Foo::Bar { bar: Bar::E, .. }` and 1 more not covered
--> $DIR/issue-39362.rs:10:11
|
LL | match f {
- | ^ patterns `Bar { bar: C, .. }`, `Bar { bar: D, .. }`, `Bar { bar: E, .. }` and 1 more not covered
+ | ^ patterns `Foo::Bar { bar: Bar::C, .. }`, `Foo::Bar { bar: Bar::D, .. }`, `Foo::Bar { bar: Bar::E, .. }` and 1 more not covered
|
note: `Foo` defined here
--> $DIR/issue-39362.rs:2:5
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `C(QA)` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `P::C(PC::QA)` not covered
--> $DIR/issue-40221.rs:11:11
|
LL | match proto {
- | ^^^^^ pattern `C(QA)` not covered
+ | ^^^^^ pattern `P::C(PC::QA)` not covered
|
note: `P` defined here
--> $DIR/issue-40221.rs:2:5
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ P::C(PC::Q) => (),
-LL ~ C(QA) => todo!(),
+LL ~ P::C(PC::QA) => todo!(),
|
error: aborting due to previous error
fn main() {
match Tag::ExifIFDPointer {
- //~^ ERROR: non-exhaustive patterns: `Tag(Exif, _)` not covered
+ //~^ ERROR: non-exhaustive patterns: `Tag(Context::Exif, _)` not covered
Tag::ExifIFDPointer => {}
}
}
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Tag(Exif, _)` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Tag(Context::Exif, _)` not covered
--> $DIR/issue-50900.rs:15:11
|
LL | match Tag::ExifIFDPointer {
- | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `Tag(Exif, _)` not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `Tag(Context::Exif, _)` not covered
|
note: `Tag` defined here
--> $DIR/issue-50900.rs:2:12
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ Tag::ExifIFDPointer => {}
-LL + Tag(Exif, _) => todo!()
+LL + Tag(Context::Exif, _) => todo!()
|
error: aborting due to previous error
fn main() {
match Foo::A(true) {
- //~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `A(false)`, `B(false)` and `C(false)` not covered
+ //~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `Foo::A(false)`, `Foo::B(false)` and `Foo::C(false)` not covered
Foo::A(true) => {}
Foo::B(true) => {}
Foo::C(true) => {}
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `A(false)`, `B(false)` and `C(false)` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Foo::A(false)`, `Foo::B(false)` and `Foo::C(false)` not covered
--> $DIR/issue-56379.rs:8:11
|
LL | match Foo::A(true) {
- | ^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `A(false)`, `B(false)` and `C(false)` not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `Foo::A(false)`, `Foo::B(false)` and `Foo::C(false)` not covered
|
note: `Foo` defined here
--> $DIR/issue-56379.rs:2:5
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL ~ Foo::C(true) => {}
-LL + A(false) | B(false) | C(false) => todo!()
+LL + Foo::A(false) | Foo::B(false) | Foo::C(false) => todo!()
|
error: aborting due to previous error
let y = Some(X::A);
match (x, y) {
- //~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `(A, Some(A))`, `(A, Some(B))`, `(B, Some(B))` and 2
+ //~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `(X::A, Some(X::A))`, `(X::A, Some(X::B))`, `(X::B, Some(X::B))` and 2
//~| more not covered
(_, None) => false,
(v, Some(w)) if v == w => true,
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `(A, Some(A))`, `(A, Some(B))`, `(B, Some(B))` and 2 more not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `(X::A, Some(X::A))`, `(X::A, Some(X::B))`, `(X::B, Some(X::B))` and 2 more not covered
--> $DIR/issue-72377.rs:8:11
|
LL | match (x, y) {
- | ^^^^^^ patterns `(A, Some(A))`, `(A, Some(B))`, `(B, Some(B))` and 2 more not covered
+ | ^^^^^^ patterns `(X::A, Some(X::A))`, `(X::A, Some(X::B))`, `(X::B, Some(X::B))` and 2 more not covered
|
= note: the matched value is of type `(X, Option<X>)`
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern as shown, or multiple match arms
fn nonexhaustive_2() {
match Some(Some(North)) {
- //~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `Some(Some(West))` not covered
+ //~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `Some(Some(Direction::West))` not covered
Some(NONE) => (),
Some(Some(North)) => (),
Some(Some(EAST)) => (),
fn nonexhaustive_3() {
match (Foo { bar: Some(North), baz: NewBool(true) }) {
- //~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `Foo { bar: Some(North), baz: NewBool(true) }`
+ //~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `Foo { bar: Some(Direction::North), baz: NewBool(true) }`
Foo { bar: None, baz: NewBool(true) } => (),
Foo { bar: _, baz: NEW_FALSE } => (),
Foo { bar: Some(West), baz: NewBool(true) } => (),
LL + (true, false) => todo!()
|
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Some(Some(West))` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Some(Some(Direction::West))` not covered
--> $DIR/match-arm-statics-2.rs:29:11
|
LL | match Some(Some(North)) {
- | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `Some(Some(West))` not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `Some(Some(Direction::West))` not covered
|
note: `Option<Option<Direction>>` defined here
--> $SRC_DIR/core/src/option.rs:LL:COL
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ None => (),
-LL + Some(Some(West)) => todo!()
+LL + Some(Some(Direction::West)) => todo!()
|
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Foo { bar: Some(North), baz: NewBool(true) }` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Foo { bar: Some(Direction::North), baz: NewBool(true) }` not covered
--> $DIR/match-arm-statics-2.rs:48:11
|
LL | match (Foo { bar: Some(North), baz: NewBool(true) }) {
- | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `Foo { bar: Some(North), baz: NewBool(true) }` not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `Foo { bar: Some(Direction::North), baz: NewBool(true) }` not covered
|
note: `Foo` defined here
--> $DIR/match-arm-statics-2.rs:40:8
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ Foo { bar: Some(EAST), .. } => (),
-LL + Foo { bar: Some(North), baz: NewBool(true) } => todo!()
+LL + Foo { bar: Some(Direction::North), baz: NewBool(true) } => todo!()
|
error: aborting due to 3 previous errors
fn by_val(e: E) {
let e1 = e.clone();
- match e1 { //~ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `B` and `C` not covered
- //~^ NOTE patterns `B` and `C` not covered
+ match e1 { //~ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `E::B` and `E::C` not covered
+ //~^ NOTE patterns `E::B` and `E::C` not covered
//~| NOTE the matched value is of type `E`
E::A => {}
}
- let E::A = e; //~ ERROR refutable pattern in local binding: `B` and `C` not covered
- //~^ NOTE patterns `B` and `C` not covered
+ let E::A = e; //~ ERROR refutable pattern in local binding: `E::B` and `E::C` not covered
+ //~^ NOTE patterns `E::B` and `E::C` not covered
//~| NOTE `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with
//~| NOTE for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html
//~| NOTE the matched value is of type `E`
}
fn by_ref_once(e: &E) {
- match e { //~ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `&B` and `&C` not covered
- //~^ NOTE patterns `&B` and `&C` not covered
+ match e { //~ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `&E::B` and `&E::C` not covered
+ //~^ NOTE patterns `&E::B` and `&E::C` not covered
//~| NOTE the matched value is of type `&E`
E::A => {}
}
- let E::A = e; //~ ERROR refutable pattern in local binding: `&B` and `&C` not covered
- //~^ NOTE patterns `&B` and `&C` not covered
+ let E::A = e; //~ ERROR refutable pattern in local binding: `&E::B` and `&E::C` not covered
+ //~^ NOTE patterns `&E::B` and `&E::C` not covered
//~| NOTE `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with
//~| NOTE for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html
//~| NOTE the matched value is of type `&E`
}
fn by_ref_thrice(e: & &mut &E) {
- match e { //~ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `&&mut &B` and `&&mut &C` not covered
- //~^ NOTE patterns `&&mut &B` and `&&mut &C` not covered
+ match e { //~ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `&&mut &E::B` and `&&mut &E::C` not covered
+ //~^ NOTE patterns `&&mut &E::B` and `&&mut &E::C` not covered
//~| NOTE the matched value is of type `&&mut &E`
E::A => {}
}
let E::A = e;
- //~^ ERROR refutable pattern in local binding: `&&mut &B` and `&&mut &C` not covered
- //~| NOTE patterns `&&mut &B` and `&&mut &C` not covered
+ //~^ ERROR refutable pattern in local binding: `&&mut &E::B` and `&&mut &E::C` not covered
+ //~| NOTE patterns `&&mut &E::B` and `&&mut &E::C` not covered
//~| NOTE `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with
//~| NOTE for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html
//~| NOTE the matched value is of type `&&mut &E`
}
fn ref_pat(e: Opt) {
- match e {//~ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `None` not covered
- //~^ NOTE pattern `None` not covered
+ match e {//~ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `Opt::None` not covered
+ //~^ NOTE pattern `Opt::None` not covered
//~| NOTE the matched value is of type `Opt`
Opt::Some(ref _x) => {}
}
- let Opt::Some(ref _x) = e; //~ ERROR refutable pattern in local binding: `None` not covered
+ let Opt::Some(ref _x) = e; //~ ERROR refutable pattern in local binding: `Opt::None` not covered
//~^ NOTE the matched value is of type `Opt`
- //~| NOTE pattern `None` not covered
+ //~| NOTE pattern `Opt::None` not covered
//~| NOTE `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with
//~| NOTE for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html
}
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `B` and `C` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `E::B` and `E::C` not covered
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-defined-here.rs:38:11
|
LL | match e1 {
- | ^^ patterns `B` and `C` not covered
+ | ^^ patterns `E::B` and `E::C` not covered
|
note: `E` defined here
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-defined-here.rs:14:5
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL ~ E::A => {}
-LL + B | C => todo!()
+LL + E::B | E::C => todo!()
|
-error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `B` and `C` not covered
+error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `E::B` and `E::C` not covered
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-defined-here.rs:44:9
|
LL | let E::A = e;
- | ^^^^ patterns `B` and `C` not covered
+ | ^^^^ patterns `E::B` and `E::C` not covered
|
= note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant
= note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html
LL | if let E::A = e { todo!() }
| ++ ~~~~~~~~~~~
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `&B` and `&C` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `&E::B` and `&E::C` not covered
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-defined-here.rs:52:11
|
LL | match e {
- | ^ patterns `&B` and `&C` not covered
+ | ^ patterns `&E::B` and `&E::C` not covered
|
note: `E` defined here
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-defined-here.rs:14:5
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL ~ E::A => {}
-LL + &B | &C => todo!()
+LL + &E::B | &E::C => todo!()
|
-error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `&B` and `&C` not covered
+error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `&E::B` and `&E::C` not covered
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-defined-here.rs:58:9
|
LL | let E::A = e;
- | ^^^^ patterns `&B` and `&C` not covered
+ | ^^^^ patterns `&E::B` and `&E::C` not covered
|
= note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant
= note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html
LL | if let E::A = e { todo!() }
| ++ ~~~~~~~~~~~
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `&&mut &B` and `&&mut &C` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `&&mut &E::B` and `&&mut &E::C` not covered
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-defined-here.rs:66:11
|
LL | match e {
- | ^ patterns `&&mut &B` and `&&mut &C` not covered
+ | ^ patterns `&&mut &E::B` and `&&mut &E::C` not covered
|
note: `E` defined here
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-defined-here.rs:14:5
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL ~ E::A => {}
-LL + &&mut &B | &&mut &C => todo!()
+LL + &&mut &E::B | &&mut &E::C => todo!()
|
-error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `&&mut &B` and `&&mut &C` not covered
+error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `&&mut &E::B` and `&&mut &E::C` not covered
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-defined-here.rs:72:9
|
LL | let E::A = e;
- | ^^^^ patterns `&&mut &B` and `&&mut &C` not covered
+ | ^^^^ patterns `&&mut &E::B` and `&&mut &E::C` not covered
|
= note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant
= note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html
LL | if let E::A = e { todo!() }
| ++ ~~~~~~~~~~~
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `None` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Opt::None` not covered
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-defined-here.rs:92:11
|
LL | match e {
- | ^ pattern `None` not covered
+ | ^ pattern `Opt::None` not covered
|
note: `Opt` defined here
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-defined-here.rs:84:5
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ Opt::Some(ref _x) => {}
-LL + None => todo!()
+LL + Opt::None => todo!()
|
-error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `None` not covered
+error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `Opt::None` not covered
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-defined-here.rs:98:9
|
LL | let Opt::Some(ref _x) = e;
- | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `None` not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `Opt::None` not covered
|
= note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant
= note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html
fn main() {
let x = T::A(U::C);
- match x { //~ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `A(C)` not covered
+ match x { //~ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `T::A(U::C)` not covered
T::A(U::D) => { panic!("hello"); }
T::B => { panic!("goodbye"); }
}
LL + (Some(&[]), Err(_)) => todo!()
|
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `A(C)` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `T::A(U::C)` not covered
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-match-nested.rs:15:11
|
LL | match x {
- | ^ pattern `A(C)` not covered
+ | ^ pattern `T::A(U::C)` not covered
|
note: `T` defined here
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-match-nested.rs:1:10
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ T::B => { panic!("goodbye"); }
-LL + A(C) => todo!()
+LL + T::A(U::C) => todo!()
|
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
fn main() {
let x = T::A;
- match x { T::B => { } } //~ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `A` not covered
+ match x { T::B => { } } //~ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `T::A` not covered
match true { //~ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `false` not covered
true => {}
}
// and `(_, _, 5_i32..=i32::MAX)` not covered
(_, _, 4) => {}
}
- match (T::A, T::A) { //~ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `(A, A)` and `(B, B)` not covered
+ match (T::A, T::A) { //~ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `(T::A, T::A)` and `(T::B, T::B)` not covered
(T::A, T::B) => {}
(T::B, T::A) => {}
}
- match T::A { //~ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `B` not covered
+ match T::A { //~ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `T::B` not covered
T::A => {}
}
// This is exhaustive, though the algorithm got it wrong at one point
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `A` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `T::A` not covered
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-match.rs:7:11
|
LL | match x { T::B => { } }
- | ^ pattern `A` not covered
+ | ^ pattern `T::A` not covered
|
note: `T` defined here
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-match.rs:3:10
= note: the matched value is of type `T`
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
-LL | match x { T::B => { }, A => todo!() }
- | ++++++++++++++
+LL | match x { T::B => { }, T::A => todo!() }
+ | +++++++++++++++++
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `false` not covered
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-match.rs:8:11
LL + (_, _, i32::MIN..=3_i32) | (_, _, 5_i32..=i32::MAX) => todo!()
|
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `(A, A)` and `(B, B)` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `(T::A, T::A)` and `(T::B, T::B)` not covered
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-match.rs:18:11
|
LL | match (T::A, T::A) {
- | ^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `(A, A)` and `(B, B)` not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `(T::A, T::A)` and `(T::B, T::B)` not covered
|
= note: the matched value is of type `(T, T)`
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL ~ (T::B, T::A) => {}
-LL + (A, A) | (B, B) => todo!()
+LL + (T::A, T::A) | (T::B, T::B) => todo!()
|
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `B` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `T::B` not covered
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-match.rs:22:11
|
LL | match T::A {
- | ^^^^ pattern `B` not covered
+ | ^^^^ pattern `T::B` not covered
|
note: `T` defined here
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-match.rs:3:13
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ T::A => {}
-LL + B => todo!()
+LL + T::B => todo!()
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `[]` not covered
fn enum_with_single_missing_variant() {
match Color::Red {
- //~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `Red` not covered
+ //~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `Color::Red` not covered
Color::CustomRGBA { .. } => (),
Color::Green => ()
}
fn enum_with_multiple_missing_variants() {
match Direction::North {
- //~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `East`, `South` and `West` not covered
+ //~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `Direction::East`, `Direction::South` and `Direction::West` not covered
Direction::North => ()
}
}
fn enum_with_excessive_missing_variants() {
match ExcessiveEnum::First {
- //~^ ERROR `Second`, `Third`, `Fourth` and 8 more not covered
+ //~^ ERROR `ExcessiveEnum::Second`, `ExcessiveEnum::Third`, `ExcessiveEnum::Fourth` and 8 more not covered
ExcessiveEnum::First => ()
}
fn enum_struct_variant() {
match Color::Red {
- //~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `CustomRGBA { a: true, .. }` not covered
+ //~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `Color::CustomRGBA { a: true, .. }` not covered
Color::Red => (),
Color::Green => (),
Color::CustomRGBA { a: false, r: _, g: _, b: 0 } => (),
fn vectors_with_nested_enums() {
let x: &'static [Enum] = &[Enum::First, Enum::Second(false)];
match *x {
- //~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `[Second(true), Second(false)]` not covered
+ //~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `[Enum::Second(true), Enum::Second(false)]` not covered
[] => (),
[_] => (),
[Enum::First, _] => (),
LL + Foo { first: false, second: Some([_, _, _, _]) } => todo!()
|
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Red` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Color::Red` not covered
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-pattern-witness.rs:23:11
|
LL | match Color::Red {
- | ^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `Red` not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `Color::Red` not covered
|
note: `Color` defined here
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-pattern-witness.rs:17:5
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ Color::Green => (),
-LL + Red => todo!()
+LL + Color::Red => todo!()
|
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `East`, `South` and `West` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Direction::East`, `Direction::South` and `Direction::West` not covered
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-pattern-witness.rs:35:11
|
LL | match Direction::North {
- | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `East`, `South` and `West` not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `Direction::East`, `Direction::South` and `Direction::West` not covered
|
note: `Direction` defined here
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-pattern-witness.rs:31:12
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL ~ Direction::North => (),
-LL + East | South | West => todo!()
+LL + Direction::East | Direction::South | Direction::West => todo!()
|
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Second`, `Third`, `Fourth` and 8 more not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `ExcessiveEnum::Second`, `ExcessiveEnum::Third`, `ExcessiveEnum::Fourth` and 8 more not covered
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-pattern-witness.rs:46:11
|
LL | match ExcessiveEnum::First {
- | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `Second`, `Third`, `Fourth` and 8 more not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `ExcessiveEnum::Second`, `ExcessiveEnum::Third`, `ExcessiveEnum::Fourth` and 8 more not covered
|
note: `ExcessiveEnum` defined here
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-pattern-witness.rs:41:6
LL + _ => todo!()
|
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `CustomRGBA { a: true, .. }` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Color::CustomRGBA { a: true, .. }` not covered
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-pattern-witness.rs:54:11
|
LL | match Color::Red {
- | ^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `CustomRGBA { a: true, .. }` not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `Color::CustomRGBA { a: true, .. }` not covered
|
note: `Color` defined here
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-pattern-witness.rs:19:5
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ Color::CustomRGBA { a: false, r: _, g: _, b: _ } => (),
-LL + CustomRGBA { a: true, .. } => todo!()
+LL + Color::CustomRGBA { a: true, .. } => todo!()
|
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `[Second(true), Second(false)]` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `[Enum::Second(true), Enum::Second(false)]` not covered
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-pattern-witness.rs:70:11
|
LL | match *x {
- | ^^ pattern `[Second(true), Second(false)]` not covered
+ | ^^ pattern `[Enum::Second(true), Enum::Second(false)]` not covered
|
= note: the matched value is of type `[Enum]`
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ [_, _, ref tail @ .., _] => (),
-LL + [Second(true), Second(false)] => todo!()
+LL + [Enum::Second(true), Enum::Second(false)] => todo!()
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `((), false)` not covered
match UnstableEnum::Stable {
UnstableEnum::Stable => {}
}
- //~^^^ non-exhaustive patterns: `Stable2` and `_` not covered
+ //~^^^ non-exhaustive patterns: `UnstableEnum::Stable2` and `_` not covered
match UnstableEnum::Stable {
UnstableEnum::Stable => {}
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Stable2` and `_` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `UnstableEnum::Stable2` and `_` not covered
--> $DIR/stable-gated-patterns.rs:8:11
|
LL | match UnstableEnum::Stable {
- | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `Stable2` and `_` not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `UnstableEnum::Stable2` and `_` not covered
|
note: `UnstableEnum` defined here
--> $DIR/auxiliary/unstable.rs:9:5
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL ~ UnstableEnum::Stable => {}
-LL + Stable2 | _ => todo!()
+LL + UnstableEnum::Stable2 | _ => todo!()
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `_` not covered
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `B { x: Some(_) }` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `A::B { x: Some(_) }` not covered
--> $DIR/struct-like-enum-nonexhaustive.rs:8:11
|
LL | match x {
- | ^ pattern `B { x: Some(_) }` not covered
+ | ^ pattern `A::B { x: Some(_) }` not covered
|
note: `A` defined here
--> $DIR/struct-like-enum-nonexhaustive.rs:2:5
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ A::B { x: None } => {}
-LL + B { x: Some(_) } => todo!()
+LL + A::B { x: Some(_) } => todo!()
|
error: aborting due to previous error
UnstableEnum::Stable => {}
UnstableEnum::Stable2 => {}
}
- //~^^^^ non-exhaustive patterns: `Unstable` not covered
+ //~^^^^ non-exhaustive patterns: `UnstableEnum::Unstable` not covered
// Ok: all variants are explicitly matched
match UnstableEnum::Stable {
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Unstable` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `UnstableEnum::Unstable` not covered
--> $DIR/unstable-gated-patterns.rs:10:11
|
LL | match UnstableEnum::Stable {
- | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `Unstable` not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `UnstableEnum::Unstable` not covered
|
note: `UnstableEnum` defined here
--> $DIR/auxiliary/unstable.rs:11:5
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ UnstableEnum::Stable2 => {}
-LL + Unstable => todo!()
+LL + UnstableEnum::Unstable => todo!()
|
error: aborting due to previous error
--- /dev/null
+#![crate_type = "lib"]
+
+#[repr(uwu)] //~ERROR: unrecognized representation hint
+pub struct OwO;
+
+#[repr(uwu = "a")] //~ERROR: unrecognized representation hint
+pub struct OwO2(i32);
+
+#[repr(uwu(4))] //~ERROR: unrecognized representation hint
+pub struct OwO3 {
+ x: i32,
+}
+
+#[repr(uwu, u8)] //~ERROR: unrecognized representation hint
+pub enum OwO4 {
+ UwU = 1,
+}
--- /dev/null
+error[E0552]: unrecognized representation hint
+ --> $DIR/invalid_repr_list_help.rs:3:8
+ |
+LL | #[repr(uwu)]
+ | ^^^
+ |
+ = help: valid reprs are `C`, `align`, `packed`, `transparent`, `simd`, `i8`, `u8`, `i16`, `u16`, `i32`, `u32`, `i64`, `u64`, `i128`, `u128`, `isize`, `usize`
+
+error[E0552]: unrecognized representation hint
+ --> $DIR/invalid_repr_list_help.rs:6:8
+ |
+LL | #[repr(uwu = "a")]
+ | ^^^^^^^^^
+ |
+ = help: valid reprs are `C`, `align`, `packed`, `transparent`, `simd`, `i8`, `u8`, `i16`, `u16`, `i32`, `u32`, `i64`, `u64`, `i128`, `u128`, `isize`, `usize`
+
+error[E0552]: unrecognized representation hint
+ --> $DIR/invalid_repr_list_help.rs:9:8
+ |
+LL | #[repr(uwu(4))]
+ | ^^^^^^
+ |
+ = help: valid reprs are `C`, `align`, `packed`, `transparent`, `simd`, `i8`, `u8`, `i16`, `u16`, `i32`, `u32`, `i64`, `u64`, `i128`, `u128`, `isize`, `usize`
+
+error[E0552]: unrecognized representation hint
+ --> $DIR/invalid_repr_list_help.rs:14:8
+ |
+LL | #[repr(uwu, u8)]
+ | ^^^
+ |
+ = help: valid reprs are `C`, `align`, `packed`, `transparent`, `simd`, `i8`, `u8`, `i16`, `u16`, `i32`, `u32`, `i64`, `u64`, `i128`, `u128`, `isize`, `usize`
+
+error: aborting due to 4 previous errors
+
+For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0552`.
fn main() {
match NonExhaustiveEnum::Unit {}
- //~^ ERROR `Unit`, `Tuple(_)` and `Struct { .. }` not covered [E0004]
+ //~^ ERROR `NonExhaustiveEnum::Unit`, `NonExhaustiveEnum::Tuple(_)` and `NonExhaustiveEnum::Struct { .. }` not covered [E0004]
match NormalEnum::Unit {}
- //~^ ERROR `Unit`, `Tuple(_)` and `Struct { .. }` not covered [E0004]
+ //~^ ERROR `NormalEnum::Unit`, `NormalEnum::Tuple(_)` and `NormalEnum::Struct { .. }` not covered [E0004]
}
LL | #![deny(unreachable_patterns)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Unit`, `Tuple(_)` and `Struct { .. }` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `NonExhaustiveEnum::Unit`, `NonExhaustiveEnum::Tuple(_)` and `NonExhaustiveEnum::Struct { .. }` not covered
--> $DIR/enum_same_crate_empty_match.rs:33:11
|
LL | match NonExhaustiveEnum::Unit {}
- | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `Unit`, `Tuple(_)` and `Struct { .. }` not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `NonExhaustiveEnum::Unit`, `NonExhaustiveEnum::Tuple(_)` and `NonExhaustiveEnum::Struct { .. }` not covered
|
note: `NonExhaustiveEnum` defined here
--> $DIR/enum_same_crate_empty_match.rs:5:5
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL ~ match NonExhaustiveEnum::Unit {
-LL + Unit | Tuple(_) | Struct { .. } => todo!(),
+LL + NonExhaustiveEnum::Unit | NonExhaustiveEnum::Tuple(_) | NonExhaustiveEnum::Struct { .. } => todo!(),
LL + }
|
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Unit`, `Tuple(_)` and `Struct { .. }` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `NormalEnum::Unit`, `NormalEnum::Tuple(_)` and `NormalEnum::Struct { .. }` not covered
--> $DIR/enum_same_crate_empty_match.rs:35:11
|
LL | match NormalEnum::Unit {}
- | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `Unit`, `Tuple(_)` and `Struct { .. }` not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `NormalEnum::Unit`, `NormalEnum::Tuple(_)` and `NormalEnum::Struct { .. }` not covered
|
note: `NormalEnum` defined here
--> $DIR/enum_same_crate_empty_match.rs:14:5
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL ~ match NormalEnum::Unit {
-LL + Unit | Tuple(_) | Struct { .. } => todo!(),
+LL + NormalEnum::Unit | NormalEnum::Tuple(_) | NormalEnum::Struct { .. } => todo!(),
LL + }
|
--> $DIR/omitted-patterns.rs:58:9
|
LL | _ => {}
- | ^ pattern `Struct { .. }` not covered
+ | ^ pattern `NonExhaustiveEnum::Struct { .. }` not covered
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/omitted-patterns.rs:57:16
--> $DIR/omitted-patterns.rs:65:9
|
LL | _ => {}
- | ^ pattern `Tuple(_)` not covered
+ | ^ pattern `NonExhaustiveEnum::Tuple(_)` not covered
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/omitted-patterns.rs:64:16
--> $DIR/omitted-patterns.rs:75:9
|
LL | _ => {}
- | ^ pattern `Unit` not covered
+ | ^ pattern `NonExhaustiveEnum::Unit` not covered
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/omitted-patterns.rs:74:16
--> $DIR/omitted-patterns.rs:92:32
|
LL | NestedNonExhaustive::A(_) => {}
- | ^ patterns `Tuple(_)` and `Struct { .. }` not covered
+ | ^ patterns `NonExhaustiveEnum::Tuple(_)` and `NonExhaustiveEnum::Struct { .. }` not covered
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/omitted-patterns.rs:89:12
--> $DIR/omitted-patterns.rs:94:9
|
LL | _ => {}
- | ^ pattern `C` not covered
+ | ^ pattern `NestedNonExhaustive::C` not covered
|
= help: ensure that all variants are matched explicitly by adding the suggested match arms
= note: the matched value is of type `NestedNonExhaustive` and the `non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns` attribute was found
--> $DIR/omitted-patterns.rs:132:9
|
LL | _ => {}
- | ^ pattern `A(_)` not covered
+ | ^ pattern `NonExhaustiveSingleVariant::A(_)` not covered
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/omitted-patterns.rs:130:12
--> $DIR/omitted-patterns.rs:144:9
|
LL | _ => {}
- | ^ pattern `Unstable` not covered
+ | ^ pattern `UnstableEnum::Unstable` not covered
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/omitted-patterns.rs:143:16
--> $DIR/omitted-patterns.rs:168:9
|
LL | _ => {}
- | ^ pattern `Unstable2` not covered
+ | ^ pattern `OnlyUnstableEnum::Unstable2` not covered
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/omitted-patterns.rs:165:12
--> $DIR/stable-omitted-patterns.rs:23:9
|
LL | _ => {}
- | ^ pattern `Stable2` not covered
+ | ^ pattern `UnstableEnum::Stable2` not covered
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/stable-omitted-patterns.rs:22:16
LL ~ }
|
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Tuple(_)` and `Struct { .. }` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `UninhabitedVariants::Tuple(_)` and `UninhabitedVariants::Struct { .. }` not covered
--> $DIR/match.rs:31:11
|
LL | match x {}
- | ^ patterns `Tuple(_)` and `Struct { .. }` not covered
+ | ^ patterns `UninhabitedVariants::Tuple(_)` and `UninhabitedVariants::Struct { .. }` not covered
|
note: `UninhabitedVariants` defined here
--> $DIR/auxiliary/uninhabited.rs:17:23
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL ~ match x {
-LL + Tuple(_) | Struct { .. } => todo!(),
+LL + UninhabitedVariants::Tuple(_) | UninhabitedVariants::Struct { .. } => todo!(),
LL ~ }
|
LL ~ }
|
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Tuple(_)` and `Struct { .. }` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `UninhabitedVariants::Tuple(_)` and `UninhabitedVariants::Struct { .. }` not covered
--> $DIR/match_same_crate.rs:38:11
|
LL | match x {}
- | ^ patterns `Tuple(_)` and `Struct { .. }` not covered
+ | ^ patterns `UninhabitedVariants::Tuple(_)` and `UninhabitedVariants::Struct { .. }` not covered
|
note: `UninhabitedVariants` defined here
--> $DIR/match_same_crate.rs:16:23
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL ~ match x {
-LL + Tuple(_) | Struct { .. } => todo!(),
+LL + UninhabitedVariants::Tuple(_) | UninhabitedVariants::Struct { .. } => todo!(),
LL ~ }
|
LL ~ }
|
-error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Tuple(_)` and `Struct { .. }` not covered
+error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `UninhabitedVariants::Tuple(_)` and `UninhabitedVariants::Struct { .. }` not covered
--> $DIR/match_with_exhaustive_patterns.rs:34:11
|
LL | match x {}
- | ^ patterns `Tuple(_)` and `Struct { .. }` not covered
+ | ^ patterns `UninhabitedVariants::Tuple(_)` and `UninhabitedVariants::Struct { .. }` not covered
|
note: `UninhabitedVariants` defined here
--> $DIR/auxiliary/uninhabited.rs:17:23
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL ~ match x {
-LL + Tuple(_) | Struct { .. } => todo!(),
+LL + UninhabitedVariants::Tuple(_) | UninhabitedVariants::Struct { .. } => todo!(),
LL ~ }
|
| |______^
help: consider adding an explicit lifetime bound...
|
-LL | fn func<T: Test + 'a>(foo: &Foo, t: T) {
- | ++++
+LL | fn func<'a, T: Test + 'a>(foo: &Foo, t: T) {
+ | +++ ++++
error: aborting due to previous error
| |_____^
help: consider adding an explicit lifetime bound...
|
-LL | G: Get<T> + 'a,
- | ++++
+LL ~ fn bar<'a, G, T>(g: G, dest: &mut T) -> impl FnOnce() + '_
+LL | where
+LL ~ G: Get<T> + 'a,
+ |
error[E0311]: the parameter type `G` may not live long enough
--> $DIR/missing-lifetimes-in-signature.rs:52:5
| |_____^
help: consider adding an explicit lifetime bound...
|
-LL | fn qux<'a, G: 'a + 'b, T>(g: G, dest: &mut T) -> impl FnOnce() + '_
- | ++++
+LL | fn qux<'b, 'a, G: 'a + 'b, T>(g: G, dest: &mut T) -> impl FnOnce() + '_
+ | +++ ++++
error[E0311]: the parameter type `G` may not live long enough
--> $DIR/missing-lifetimes-in-signature.rs:61:9
| |_________^
help: consider adding an explicit lifetime bound...
|
-LL | fn qux<'b, G: Get<T> + 'b + 'c, T>(g: G, dest: &mut T) -> impl FnOnce() + '_ {
- | ++++
+LL | fn qux<'c, 'b, G: Get<T> + 'b + 'c, T>(g: G, dest: &mut T) -> impl FnOnce() + '_ {
+ | +++ ++++
error[E0311]: the parameter type `G` may not live long enough
--> $DIR/missing-lifetimes-in-signature.rs:73:5
| |_____^
help: consider adding an explicit lifetime bound...
|
-LL | fn bat<'a, G: 'a + 'b, T>(g: G, dest: &mut T) -> impl FnOnce() + '_ + 'a
- | ++++
+LL | fn bat<'b, 'a, G: 'a + 'b, T>(g: G, dest: &mut T) -> impl FnOnce() + '_ + 'a
+ | +++ ++++
error[E0621]: explicit lifetime required in the type of `dest`
--> $DIR/missing-lifetimes-in-signature.rs:73:5
fn main() {
let x: Foo = Foo::D(123, 456);
- let Foo::D(_y, _z) = x; //~ ERROR refutable pattern in local binding: `A(_)` not covered
+ let Foo::D(_y, _z) = x; //~ ERROR refutable pattern in local binding: `Foo::A(_)` not covered
}
-error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `A(_)` not covered
+error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `Foo::A(_)` not covered
--> $DIR/uninhabited-irrefutable.rs:27:9
|
LL | let Foo::D(_y, _z) = x;
- | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `A(_)` not covered
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `Foo::A(_)` not covered
|
= note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant
= note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html
projects / rust.git / commitdiff