///
/// The type system would currently infer that the value of
/// the type parameter `T` is irrelevant, and hence a `S<int>` is
- /// a subtype of `S<~[int]>` (or, for that matter, `S<U>` for
+ /// a subtype of `S<Box<int>>` (or, for that matter, `S<U>` for
/// any `U`). But this is incorrect because `get()` converts the
/// `*()` into a `*T` and reads from it. Therefore, we should include the
/// a marker field `CovariantType<T>` to inform the type checker that
///
/// The type system would currently infer that the value of
/// the type parameter `T` is irrelevant, and hence a `S<int>` is
- /// a subtype of `S<~[int]>` (or, for that matter, `S<U>` for
+ /// a subtype of `S<Box<int>>` (or, for that matter, `S<U>` for
/// any `U`). But this is incorrect because `get()` converts the
/// `*()` into a `fn(T)` and then passes a value of type `T` to it.
///