Strip the trait-def phase from collect, which has no function.

diff --git a/src/librustc_typeck/collect.rs b/src/librustc_typeck/collect.rs
index 6135cf1d32a01114a2c45f844d885da0a4e7c5b4..d161324f5644fec798bc0f26e4eddd495e102562 100644 (file)
--- a/src/librustc_typeck/collect.rs
+++ b/src/librustc_typeck/collect.rs
@@ -34,13 +34,12 @@
 Demand is driven by calls to `AstConv::get_item_type_scheme` or
 `AstConv::lookup_trait_def`.
 
-Currently, we "convert" types and traits in three phases (note that
+Currently, we "convert" types and traits in two phases (note that
 conversion only affects the types of items / enum variants / methods;
 it does not e.g. compute the types of individual expressions):
 
 0. Intrinsics
-1. Trait definitions
-2. Type definitions
+1. Trait/Type definitions
 
 Conversion itself is done by simply walking each of the items in turn
 and invoking an appropriate function (e.g., `trait_def_of_item` or
@@ -56,11 +55,6 @@
 - Because the type scheme includes defaults, cycles through type
   parameter defaults are illegal even if those defaults are never
   employed. This is not necessarily a bug.
-- The phasing of trait definitions before type definitions does not
-  seem to be necessary, sufficient, or particularly helpful, given that
-  processing a trait definition can trigger processing a type def and
-  vice versa. However, if I remove it, I get ICEs, so some more work is
-  needed in that area. -nmatsakis
 
 */
 
@@ -105,9 +99,6 @@
 pub fn collect_item_types(tcx: &ty::ctxt) {
     let ccx = &CrateCtxt { tcx: tcx, stack: RefCell::new(Vec::new()) };
 
-    let mut visitor = CollectTraitDefVisitor{ ccx: ccx };
-    ccx.tcx.map.krate().visit_all_items(&mut visitor);
-
     let mut visitor = CollectItemTypesVisitor{ ccx: ccx };
     ccx.tcx.map.krate().visit_all_items(&mut visitor);
 }
@@ -147,28 +138,6 @@ enum AstConvRequest {
 }
 
 ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
-// First phase: just collect *trait definitions* -- basically, the set
-// of type parameters and supertraits. This is information we need to
-// know later when parsing field defs.
-
-struct CollectTraitDefVisitor<'a, 'tcx: 'a> {
-    ccx: &'a CrateCtxt<'a, 'tcx>
-}
-
-impl<'a, 'tcx, 'v> intravisit::Visitor<'v> for CollectTraitDefVisitor<'a, 'tcx> {
-    fn visit_item(&mut self, i: &hir::Item) {
-        match i.node {
-            hir::ItemTrait(..) => {
-                // computing the trait def also fills in the table
-                let _ = trait_def_of_item(self.ccx, i);
-            }
-            _ => { }
-        }
-    }
-}
-
-///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
-// Second phase: collection proper.
 
 struct CollectItemTypesVisitor<'a, 'tcx: 'a> {
     ccx: &'a CrateCtxt<'a, 'tcx>
@@ -1286,16 +1255,11 @@ fn trait_def_of_item<'a, 'tcx>(ccx: &CrateCtxt<'a, 'tcx>,
         substs: substs,
     };
 
-    let trait_def = ty::TraitDef {
-        paren_sugar: paren_sugar,
-        unsafety: unsafety,
-        generics: ty_generics,
-        trait_ref: trait_ref,
-        associated_type_names: associated_type_names,
-        nonblanket_impls: RefCell::new(FnvHashMap()),
-        blanket_impls: RefCell::new(vec![]),
-        flags: Cell::new(ty::TraitFlags::NO_TRAIT_FLAGS)
-    };
+    let trait_def = ty::TraitDef::new(unsafety,
+                                      paren_sugar,
+                                      ty_generics,
+                                      trait_ref,
+                                      associated_type_names);
 
     return tcx.intern_trait_def(trait_def);