fn check_powf(cx: &LateContext<'_>, expr: &Expr<'_>, args: &[Expr<'_>]) {
// Check receiver
if let Some((value, _)) = constant(cx, cx.typeck_results(), &args[0]) {
- let method = if F32(f32_consts::E) == value || F64(f64_consts::E) == value {
- "exp"
+ if let Some(method) = if F32(f32_consts::E) == value || F64(f64_consts::E) == value {
+ Some("exp")
} else if F32(2.0) == value || F64(2.0) == value {
- "exp2"
+ Some("exp2")
} else {
- return;
- };
-
- span_lint_and_sugg(
- cx,
- SUBOPTIMAL_FLOPS,
- expr.span,
- "exponent for bases 2 and e can be computed more accurately",
- "consider using",
- format!("{}.{}()", prepare_receiver_sugg(cx, &args[1]), method),
- Applicability::MachineApplicable,
- );
+ None
+ } {
+ span_lint_and_sugg(
+ cx,
+ SUBOPTIMAL_FLOPS,
+ expr.span,
+ "exponent for bases 2 and e can be computed more accurately",
+ "consider using",
+ format!("{}.{}()", prepare_receiver_sugg(cx, &args[1]), method),
+ Applicability::MachineApplicable,
+ );
+ }
}
// Check argument
LL | let _ = (x as f32).powf(3.0);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `(x as f32).powi(3)`
+error: cube-root of a number can be computed more accurately
+ --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:21:13
+ |
+LL | let _ = (1.5_f32 + 1.0).powf(1.0 / 3.0);
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `(1.5_f32 + 1.0).cbrt()`
+
+error: cube-root of a number can be computed more accurately
+ --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:22:13
+ |
+LL | let _ = 1.5_f64.powf(1.0 / 3.0);
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `1.5_f64.cbrt()`
+
+error: square-root of a number can be computed more efficiently and accurately
+ --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:23:13
+ |
+LL | let _ = 1.5_f64.powf(1.0 / 2.0);
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `1.5_f64.sqrt()`
+
+error: exponentiation with integer powers can be computed more efficiently
+ --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:24:13
+ |
+LL | let _ = 1.5_f64.powf(3.0);
+ | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `1.5_f64.powi(3)`
+
error: exponent for bases 2 and e can be computed more accurately
- --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:28:13
+ --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:33:13
|
LL | let _ = 2f64.powf(x);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.exp2()`
error: exponent for bases 2 and e can be computed more accurately
- --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:29:13
+ --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:34:13
|
LL | let _ = 2f64.powf(3.1);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `3.1f64.exp2()`
error: exponent for bases 2 and e can be computed more accurately
- --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:30:13
+ --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:35:13
|
LL | let _ = 2f64.powf(-3.1);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `(-3.1f64).exp2()`
error: exponent for bases 2 and e can be computed more accurately
- --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:31:13
+ --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:36:13
|
LL | let _ = std::f64::consts::E.powf(x);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.exp()`
error: exponent for bases 2 and e can be computed more accurately
- --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:32:13
+ --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:37:13
|
LL | let _ = std::f64::consts::E.powf(3.1);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `3.1f64.exp()`
error: exponent for bases 2 and e can be computed more accurately
- --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:33:13
+ --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:38:13
|
LL | let _ = std::f64::consts::E.powf(-3.1);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `(-3.1f64).exp()`
error: square-root of a number can be computed more efficiently and accurately
- --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:34:13
+ --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:39:13
|
LL | let _ = x.powf(1.0 / 2.0);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.sqrt()`
error: cube-root of a number can be computed more accurately
- --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:35:13
+ --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:40:13
|
LL | let _ = x.powf(1.0 / 3.0);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.cbrt()`
error: exponentiation with integer powers can be computed more efficiently
- --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:36:13
+ --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:41:13
|
LL | let _ = x.powf(3.0);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.powi(3)`
error: exponentiation with integer powers can be computed more efficiently
- --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:37:13
+ --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:42:13
|
LL | let _ = x.powf(-2.0);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.powi(-2)`
error: exponentiation with integer powers can be computed more efficiently
- --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:38:13
+ --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:43:13
|
LL | let _ = x.powf(-2_147_483_648.0);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.powi(-2_147_483_648)`
error: exponentiation with integer powers can be computed more efficiently
- --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:39:13
+ --> $DIR/floating_point_powf.rs:44:13
|
LL | let _ = x.powf(2_147_483_647.0);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: consider using: `x.powi(2_147_483_647)`
-error: aborting due to 27 previous errors
+error: aborting due to 31 previous errors