Rollup merge of #72834 - JOE1994:correct_confusing_term, r=sfackler

Rephrase term 'non-pointer type'

Hello :cat2: ,

If the reader assumes that 'pointer type's include 'smart pointer's,
the term 'non-pointer type' could mislead the reader to assume that
x should not be a smart pointer type. I tried to rephrase the term
'non-pointer type' to remove ambiguity in the doc comments.

closes #72335

Thank you for reviewing this PR! :superhero_woman: