-/// This test case utilizes `f64` an easy example for `PartialOrd` only types
-/// but the lint itself actually validates any expression where the left
-/// operand implements `PartialOrd` but not `Ord`.
+//! This test case utilizes `f64` an easy example for `PartialOrd` only types
+//! but the lint itself actually validates any expression where the left
+//! operand implements `PartialOrd` but not `Ord`.
use std::cmp::Ordering;
-#[warn(neg_cmp_op_on_partial_ord)]
+#[warn(clippy::neg_cmp_op_on_partial_ord)]
fn main() {
-
let a_value = 1.0;
let another_value = 7.0;
// --- Bad ---
-
// Not Less but potentially Greater, Equal or Uncomparable.
let _not_less = !(a_value < another_value);
-
+
// Not Less or Equal but potentially Greater or Uncomparable.
let _not_less_or_equal = !(a_value <= another_value);
// Not Greater or Equal but potentially Less or Uncomparable.
let _not_greater_or_equal = !(a_value >= another_value);
-
// --- Good ---
-
let _not_less = match a_value.partial_cmp(&another_value) {
- None | Some(Ordering::Greater) | Some(Ordering::Equal) => true,
+ None | Some(Ordering::Greater) | Some(Ordering::Equal) => true,
_ => false,
};
let _not_less_or_equal = match a_value.partial_cmp(&another_value) {
_ => false,
};
-
// --- Should not trigger ---
-
let _ = a_value < another_value;
let _ = a_value <= another_value;
let _ = a_value > another_value;
let _ = a_value >= another_value;
-}
+ // --- regression tests ---
+
+ // Issue 2856: False positive on assert!()
+ //
+ // The macro always negates the result of the given comparison in its
+ // internal check which automatically triggered the lint. As it's an
+ // external macro there was no chance to do anything about it which led
+ // to a whitelisting of all external macros.
+ assert!(a_value < another_value);
+}