-error: Consider using an AtomicBool instead of a Mutex here. If you just want the locking behaviour and not the internal type, consider using Mutex<()>.
- --> $DIR/mutex_atomic.rs:15:5
+error: Consider using an `AtomicBool` instead of a `Mutex` here. If you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`.
+ --> $DIR/mutex_atomic.rs:6:5
|
LL | Mutex::new(true);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: `-D clippy::mutex-atomic` implied by `-D warnings`
-error: Consider using an AtomicUsize instead of a Mutex here. If you just want the locking behaviour and not the internal type, consider using Mutex<()>.
- --> $DIR/mutex_atomic.rs:16:5
+error: Consider using an `AtomicUsize` instead of a `Mutex` here. If you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`.
+ --> $DIR/mutex_atomic.rs:7:5
|
LL | Mutex::new(5usize);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
-error: Consider using an AtomicIsize instead of a Mutex here. If you just want the locking behaviour and not the internal type, consider using Mutex<()>.
- --> $DIR/mutex_atomic.rs:17:5
+error: Consider using an `AtomicIsize` instead of a `Mutex` here. If you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`.
+ --> $DIR/mutex_atomic.rs:8:5
|
LL | Mutex::new(9isize);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
-error: Consider using an AtomicPtr instead of a Mutex here. If you just want the locking behaviour and not the internal type, consider using Mutex<()>.
- --> $DIR/mutex_atomic.rs:19:5
+error: Consider using an `AtomicPtr` instead of a `Mutex` here. If you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`.
+ --> $DIR/mutex_atomic.rs:10:5
|
LL | Mutex::new(&x as *const u32);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
-error: Consider using an AtomicPtr instead of a Mutex here. If you just want the locking behaviour and not the internal type, consider using Mutex<()>.
- --> $DIR/mutex_atomic.rs:20:5
+error: Consider using an `AtomicPtr` instead of a `Mutex` here. If you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`.
+ --> $DIR/mutex_atomic.rs:11:5
|
LL | Mutex::new(&mut x as *mut u32);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
-error: Consider using an AtomicUsize instead of a Mutex here. If you just want the locking behaviour and not the internal type, consider using Mutex<()>.
- --> $DIR/mutex_atomic.rs:21:5
+error: Consider using an `AtomicUsize` instead of a `Mutex` here. If you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`.
+ --> $DIR/mutex_atomic.rs:12:5
|
LL | Mutex::new(0u32);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: `-D clippy::mutex-integer` implied by `-D warnings`
-error: Consider using an AtomicIsize instead of a Mutex here. If you just want the locking behaviour and not the internal type, consider using Mutex<()>.
- --> $DIR/mutex_atomic.rs:22:5
+error: Consider using an `AtomicIsize` instead of a `Mutex` here. If you just want the locking behavior and not the internal type, consider using `Mutex<()>`.
+ --> $DIR/mutex_atomic.rs:13:5
|
LL | Mutex::new(0i32);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^