iterate List by value

[rust.git] / tests / ui / get_unwrap.stderr

diff --git a/tests/ui/get_unwrap.stderr b/tests/ui/get_unwrap.stderr
index 90b46e960f47f976e612129cec6d499eb6f76537..76a098df82aa199adb0186eb098b0e540fc6ba91 100644 (file)
--- a/tests/ui/get_unwrap.stderr
+++ b/tests/ui/get_unwrap.stderr
@@ -1,76 +1,86 @@
 error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
-  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:37:17
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:34:17
    |
-37 |         let _ = boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap();
+LL |         let _ = boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap();
    |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&boxed_slice[1]`
    |
-   = note: `-D clippy::get-unwrap` implied by `-D warnings`
+note: the lint level is defined here
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:3:9
+   |
+LL | #![deny(clippy::get_unwrap)]
+   |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 
 error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
-  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:38:17
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:35:17
    |
-38 |         let _ = some_slice.get(0).unwrap();
+LL |         let _ = some_slice.get(0).unwrap();
    |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_slice[0]`
 
 error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
-  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:39:17
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:36:17
    |
-39 |         let _ = some_vec.get(0).unwrap();
+LL |         let _ = some_vec.get(0).unwrap();
    |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_vec[0]`
 
 error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a VecDeque. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
-  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:40:17
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:37:17
    |
-40 |         let _ = some_vecdeque.get(0).unwrap();
+LL |         let _ = some_vecdeque.get(0).unwrap();
    |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_vecdeque[0]`
 
 error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a HashMap. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
-  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:41:17
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:38:17
    |
-41 |         let _ = some_hashmap.get(&1).unwrap();
+LL |         let _ = some_hashmap.get(&1).unwrap();
    |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_hashmap[&1]`
 
 error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a BTreeMap. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
-  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:42:17
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:39:17
    |
-42 |         let _ = some_btreemap.get(&1).unwrap();
+LL |         let _ = some_btreemap.get(&1).unwrap();
    |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_btreemap[&1]`
 
+error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:42:21
+   |
+LL |         let _: u8 = *boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap();
+   |                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `boxed_slice[1]`
+
 error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
-  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:47:10
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:47:9
    |
-47 |         *boxed_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
-   |          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&mut boxed_slice[0]`
+LL |         *boxed_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
+   |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `boxed_slice[0]`
 
 error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
-  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:48:10
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:48:9
    |
-48 |         *some_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
-   |          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&mut some_slice[0]`
+LL |         *some_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
+   |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_slice[0]`
 
 error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
-  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:49:10
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:49:9
    |
-49 |         *some_vec.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
-   |          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&mut some_vec[0]`
+LL |         *some_vec.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
+   |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vec[0]`
 
 error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a VecDeque. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
-  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:50:10
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:50:9
    |
-50 |         *some_vecdeque.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
-   |          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&mut some_vecdeque[0]`
+LL |         *some_vecdeque.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
+   |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vecdeque[0]`
 
 error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
-  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:58:17
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:59:17
    |
-58 |         let _ = some_vec.get(0..1).unwrap().to_vec();
+LL |         let _ = some_vec.get(0..1).unwrap().to_vec();
    |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vec[0..1]`
 
 error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
-  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:59:17
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:60:17
    |
-59 |         let _ = some_vec.get_mut(0..1).unwrap().to_vec();
+LL |         let _ = some_vec.get_mut(0..1).unwrap().to_vec();
    |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vec[0..1]`
 
-error: aborting due to 12 previous errors
+error: aborting due to 13 previous errors