position: GenericArgPosition,
has_self: bool,
infer_args: bool,
- ) -> (bool, Option<Vec<Span>>) {
+ ) -> (bool, Vec<Span>) {
// At this stage we are guaranteed that the generic arguments are in the correct order, e.g.
// that lifetimes will proceed types. So it suffices to check the number of each generic
// arguments in order to validate them with respect to the generic parameters.
}
// Prohibit explicit lifetime arguments if late-bound lifetime parameters are present.
- let mut reported_late_bound_region_err = None;
+ let mut reported_late_bound_region_err = false;
if !infer_lifetimes {
if let Some(span_late) = def.has_late_bound_regions {
+ reported_late_bound_region_err = true;
let msg = "cannot specify lifetime arguments explicitly \
if late bound lifetime parameters are present";
let note = "the late bound lifetime parameter is introduced here";
let mut err = tcx.sess.struct_span_err(span, msg);
err.span_note(span_late, note);
err.emit();
- reported_late_bound_region_err = Some(true);
} else {
let mut multispan = MultiSpan::from_span(span);
multispan.push_span_label(span_late, note.to_string());
multispan,
|lint| lint.build(msg).emit(),
);
- reported_late_bound_region_err = Some(false);
}
}
}
- let check_kind_count = |kind, required, permitted, provided, offset| {
- debug!(
- "check_kind_count: kind: {} required: {} permitted: {} provided: {} offset: {}",
- kind, required, permitted, provided, offset
- );
- // We enforce the following: `required` <= `provided` <= `permitted`.
- // For kinds without defaults (e.g.., lifetimes), `required == permitted`.
- // For other kinds (i.e., types), `permitted` may be greater than `required`.
- if required <= provided && provided <= permitted {
- return (reported_late_bound_region_err.unwrap_or(false), None);
- }
-
- // Unfortunately lifetime and type parameter mismatches are typically styled
- // differently in diagnostics, which means we have a few cases to consider here.
- let (bound, quantifier) = if required != permitted {
- if provided < required {
- (required, "at least ")
- } else {
- // provided > permitted
- (permitted, "at most ")
+ let check_kind_count =
+ |kind, required, permitted, provided, offset, unexpected_spans: &mut Vec<Span>| {
+ debug!(
+ "check_kind_count: kind: {} required: {} permitted: {} provided: {} offset: {}",
+ kind, required, permitted, provided, offset
+ );
+ // We enforce the following: `required` <= `provided` <= `permitted`.
+ // For kinds without defaults (e.g.., lifetimes), `required == permitted`.
+ // For other kinds (i.e., types), `permitted` may be greater than `required`.
+ if required <= provided && provided <= permitted {
+ return false;
}
- } else {
- (required, "")
- };
- let mut potential_assoc_types: Option<Vec<Span>> = None;
- let (spans, label) = if required == permitted && provided > permitted {
- // In the case when the user has provided too many arguments,
- // we want to point to the unexpected arguments.
- let spans: Vec<Span> = args.args[offset + permitted..offset + provided]
- .iter()
- .map(|arg| arg.span())
- .collect();
- potential_assoc_types = Some(spans.clone());
- (spans, format!("unexpected {} argument", kind))
- } else {
- (
- vec![span],
- format!(
- "expected {}{} {} argument{}",
- quantifier,
- bound,
- kind,
- pluralize!(bound),
+ // Unfortunately lifetime and type parameter mismatches are typically styled
+ // differently in diagnostics, which means we have a few cases to consider here.
+ let (bound, quantifier) = if required != permitted {
+ if provided < required {
+ (required, "at least ")
+ } else {
+ // provided > permitted
+ (permitted, "at most ")
+ }
+ } else {
+ (required, "")
+ };
+
+ let (spans, label) = if required == permitted && provided > permitted {
+ // In the case when the user has provided too many arguments,
+ // we want to point to the unexpected arguments.
+ let spans: Vec<Span> = args.args[offset + permitted..offset + provided]
+ .iter()
+ .map(|arg| arg.span())
+ .collect();
+ unexpected_spans.extend(spans.clone());
+ (spans, format!("unexpected {} argument", kind))
+ } else {
+ (
+ vec![span],
+ format!(
+ "expected {}{} {} argument{}",
+ quantifier,
+ bound,
+ kind,
+ pluralize!(bound),
+ ),
+ )
+ };
+
+ let mut err = tcx.sess.struct_span_err_with_code(
+ spans.clone(),
+ &format!(
+ "wrong number of {} arguments: expected {}{}, found {}",
+ kind, quantifier, bound, provided,
),
- )
- };
+ DiagnosticId::Error("E0107".into()),
+ );
+ for span in spans {
+ err.span_label(span, label.as_str());
+ }
+ err.emit();
- let mut err = tcx.sess.struct_span_err_with_code(
- spans.clone(),
- &format!(
- "wrong number of {} arguments: expected {}{}, found {}",
- kind, quantifier, bound, provided,
- ),
- DiagnosticId::Error("E0107".into()),
- );
- for span in spans {
- err.span_label(span, label.as_str());
- }
- err.emit();
+ true
+ };
- (
- provided > required, // `suppress_error`
- potential_assoc_types,
- )
- };
+ let mut arg_count_mismatch = reported_late_bound_region_err;
+ let mut unexpected_spans = vec![];
- if reported_late_bound_region_err.is_none()
+ if !reported_late_bound_region_err
&& (!infer_lifetimes || arg_counts.lifetimes > param_counts.lifetimes)
{
- check_kind_count(
+ arg_count_mismatch |= check_kind_count(
"lifetime",
param_counts.lifetimes,
param_counts.lifetimes,
arg_counts.lifetimes,
0,
+ &mut unexpected_spans,
);
}
// FIXME(const_generics:defaults)
if !infer_args || arg_counts.consts > param_counts.consts {
- check_kind_count(
+ arg_count_mismatch |= check_kind_count(
"const",
param_counts.consts,
param_counts.consts,
arg_counts.consts,
arg_counts.lifetimes + arg_counts.types,
+ &mut unexpected_spans,
);
}
// Note that type errors are currently be emitted *after* const errors.
if !infer_args || arg_counts.types > param_counts.types - defaults.types - has_self as usize
{
- check_kind_count(
+ arg_count_mismatch |= check_kind_count(
"type",
param_counts.types - defaults.types - has_self as usize,
param_counts.types - has_self as usize,
arg_counts.types,
arg_counts.lifetimes,
- )
- } else {
- (reported_late_bound_region_err.unwrap_or(false), None)
+ &mut unexpected_spans,
+ );
}
+
+ (arg_count_mismatch, unexpected_spans)
}
/// Creates the relevant generic argument substitutions
parent_substs: &[subst::GenericArg<'tcx>],
has_self: bool,
self_ty: Option<Ty<'tcx>>,
+ arg_count_mismatch: bool,
args_for_def_id: impl Fn(DefId) -> (Option<&'b GenericArgs<'b>>, bool),
provided_kind: impl Fn(&GenericParamDef, &GenericArg<'_>) -> subst::GenericArg<'tcx>,
mut inferred_kind: impl FnMut(
// methods in `subst.rs`, so that we can iterate over the arguments and
// parameters in lock-step linearly, instead of trying to match each pair.
let mut substs: SmallVec<[subst::GenericArg<'tcx>; 8]> = SmallVec::with_capacity(count);
-
// Iterate over each segment of the path.
while let Some((def_id, defs)) = stack.pop() {
let mut params = defs.params.iter().peekable();
let mut args =
generic_args.iter().flat_map(|generic_args| generic_args.args.iter()).peekable();
+ let arg_kind = |arg| match arg {
+ &GenericArg::Lifetime(_) => "lifetime",
+ &GenericArg::Type(_) => "type",
+ &GenericArg::Const(_) => "constant",
+ };
+
+ // If we encounter a type or const when we expect a lifetime, we infer the lifetimes.
+ // If we later encounter a lifetime, we know that the arguments were provided in the
+ // wrong order. `force_infer_lt` records the type or const that forced lifetimes to be
+ // inferred, so we can use it for diagnostics later.
+ let mut force_infer_lt = None;
+
loop {
// We're going to iterate through the generic arguments that the user
// provided, matching them with the generic parameters we expect.
// We expected a lifetime argument, but got a type or const
// argument. That means we're inferring the lifetimes.
substs.push(inferred_kind(None, param, infer_args));
+ force_infer_lt = Some(arg);
params.next();
}
- (_, _) => {
+ (_, kind) => {
// We expected one kind of parameter, but the user provided
- // another. This is an error, but we need to handle it
- // gracefully so we can report sensible errors.
- // In this case, we're simply going to infer this argument.
- args.next();
+ // another. This is an error. However, if we already know that
+ // the arguments don't match up with the parameters, we won't issue
+ // an additional error, as the user already knows what's wrong.
+ if !arg_count_mismatch {
+ let param_kind = match kind {
+ GenericParamDefKind::Lifetime => "lifetime",
+ GenericParamDefKind::Type { .. } => "type",
+ GenericParamDefKind::Const => "constant",
+ };
+ struct_span_err!(
+ tcx.sess,
+ arg.span(),
+ E0747,
+ "{} provided when a {} was expected",
+ arg_kind(arg),
+ param_kind,
+ )
+ .emit();
+ }
+
+ // We've reported the error, but we want to make sure that this
+ // problem doesn't bubble down and create additional, irrelevant
+ // errors. In this case, we're simply going to ignore the argument
+ // and any following arguments. The rest of the parameters will be
+ // inferred.
+ while args.next().is_some() {}
}
}
}
- (Some(_), None) => {
+ (Some(&arg), None) => {
// We should never be able to reach this point with well-formed input.
- // Getting to this point means the user supplied more arguments than
- // there are parameters.
- args.next();
+ // There are two situations in which we can encounter this issue.
+ //
+ // 1. The number of arguments is incorrect. In this case, an error
+ // will already have been emitted, and we can ignore it. This case
+ // also occurs when late-bound lifetime parameters are present, yet
+ // the lifetime arguments have also been explicitly specified by the
+ // user.
+ // 2. We've inferred some lifetimes, which have been provided later (i.e.
+ // after a type or const). We want to throw an error in this case.
+
+ if !arg_count_mismatch {
+ let kind = arg_kind(arg);
+ assert_eq!(kind, "lifetime");
+ let provided =
+ force_infer_lt.expect("lifetimes ought to have been inferred");
+ struct_span_err!(
+ tcx.sess,
+ provided.span(),
+ E0747,
+ "{} provided when a {} was expected",
+ arg_kind(provided),
+ kind,
+ )
+ .emit();
+ }
+
+ break;
}
(None, Some(¶m)) => {
// If there are fewer arguments than parameters, it means
// we're inferring the remaining arguments.
substs.push(inferred_kind(Some(&substs), param, infer_args));
- args.next();
params.next();
}
(None, None) => break,
generic_args: &'a hir::GenericArgs<'_>,
infer_args: bool,
self_ty: Option<Ty<'tcx>>,
- ) -> (SubstsRef<'tcx>, Vec<ConvertedBinding<'a, 'tcx>>, Option<Vec<Span>>) {
+ ) -> (SubstsRef<'tcx>, Vec<ConvertedBinding<'a, 'tcx>>, Vec<Span>) {
// If the type is parameterized by this region, then replace this
// region with the current anon region binding (in other words,
// whatever & would get replaced with).
assert!(self_ty.is_none() && parent_substs.is_empty());
}
- let (_, potential_assoc_types) = Self::check_generic_arg_count(
+ let (arg_count_mismatch, potential_assoc_types) = Self::check_generic_arg_count(
tcx,
span,
&generic_params,
parent_substs,
self_ty.is_some(),
self_ty,
+ arg_count_mismatch,
// Provide the generic args, and whether types should be inferred.
- |_| (Some(generic_args), infer_args),
+ |did| {
+ if did == def_id {
+ (Some(generic_args), infer_args)
+ } else {
+ // The last component of this tuple is unimportant.
+ (None, false)
+ }
+ },
// Provide substitutions for parameters for which (valid) arguments have been provided.
|param, arg| match (¶m.kind, arg) {
(GenericParamDefKind::Lifetime, GenericArg::Lifetime(lt)) => {
self_ty: Ty<'tcx>,
bounds: &mut Bounds<'tcx>,
speculative: bool,
- ) -> Option<Vec<Span>> {
+ ) -> Vec<Span> {
let trait_def_id = trait_ref.trait_def_id();
debug!("instantiate_poly_trait_ref({:?}, def_id={:?})", trait_ref, trait_def_id);
"instantiate_poly_trait_ref({:?}, bounds={:?}) -> {:?}",
trait_ref, bounds, poly_trait_ref
);
+
potential_assoc_types
}
constness: Constness,
self_ty: Ty<'tcx>,
bounds: &mut Bounds<'tcx>,
- ) -> Option<Vec<Span>> {
+ ) -> Vec<Span> {
self.instantiate_poly_trait_ref_inner(
&poly_trait_ref.trait_ref,
poly_trait_ref.span,
trait_def_id: DefId,
self_ty: Ty<'tcx>,
trait_segment: &'a hir::PathSegment<'a>,
- ) -> (SubstsRef<'tcx>, Vec<ConvertedBinding<'a, 'tcx>>, Option<Vec<Span>>) {
+ ) -> (SubstsRef<'tcx>, Vec<ConvertedBinding<'a, 'tcx>>, Vec<Span>) {
debug!("create_substs_for_ast_trait_ref(trait_segment={:?})", trait_segment);
self.complain_about_internal_fn_trait(span, trait_def_id, trait_segment);
dummy_self,
&mut bounds,
);
- potential_assoc_types.extend(cur_potential_assoc_types.into_iter().flatten());
+ potential_assoc_types.extend(cur_potential_assoc_types.into_iter());
}
// Expand trait aliases recursively and check that only one regular (non-auto) trait
// mir.
if let Ok(c) = tcx.at(expr.span).lit_to_const(lit_input) {
return c;
+ } else {
+ tcx.sess.delay_span_bug(expr.span, "ast_const_to_const: couldn't lit_to_const");
}
}