-% Writing Unsafe and Low-Level Code in Rust
+% Writing Safe Low-level and Unsafe Code in Rust
-# Introduction
-
-Rust aims to provide safe abstractions over the low-level details of
-the CPU and operating system, but sometimes one needs to drop down and
-write code at that level. This guide aims to provide an overview of
-the dangers and power one gets with Rust's unsafe subset.
-
-Rust provides an escape hatch in the form of the `unsafe { ... }`
-block which allows the programmer to dodge some of the compiler's
-checks and do a wide range of operations, such as:
-
-- dereferencing [raw pointers](#raw-pointers)
-- calling a function via FFI ([covered by the FFI guide](guide-ffi.html))
-- casting between types bitwise (`transmute`, aka "reinterpret cast")
-- [inline assembly](#inline-assembly)
-
-Note that an `unsafe` block does not relax the rules about lifetimes
-of `&` and the freezing of borrowed data.
-
-Any use of `unsafe` is the programmer saying "I know more than you" to
-the compiler, and, as such, the programmer should be very sure that
-they actually do know more about why that piece of code is valid. In
-general, one should try to minimize the amount of unsafe code in a
-code base; preferably by using the bare minimum `unsafe` blocks to
-build safe interfaces.
-
-> **Note**: the low-level details of the Rust language are still in
-> flux, and there is no guarantee of stability or backwards
-> compatibility. In particular, there may be changes that do not cause
-> compilation errors, but do cause semantic changes (such as invoking
-> undefined behaviour). As such, extreme care is required.
-
-# Pointers
-
-## References
-
-One of Rust's biggest features is memory safety. This is achieved in
-part via [the ownership system](guide-ownership.html), which is how the
-compiler can guarantee that every `&` reference is always valid, and,
-for example, never pointing to freed memory.
-
-These restrictions on `&` have huge advantages. However, they also
-constrain how we can use them. For example, `&` doesn't behave
-identically to C's pointers, and so cannot be used for pointers in
-foreign function interfaces (FFI). Additionally, both immutable (`&`)
-and mutable (`&mut`) references have some aliasing and freezing
-guarantees, required for memory safety.
-
-In particular, if you have an `&T` reference, then the `T` must not be
-modified through that reference or any other reference. There are some
-standard library types, e.g. `Cell` and `RefCell`, that provide inner
-mutability by replacing compile time guarantees with dynamic checks at
-runtime.
-
-An `&mut` reference has a different constraint: when an object has an
-`&mut T` pointing into it, then that `&mut` reference must be the only
-such usable path to that object in the whole program. That is, an
-`&mut` cannot alias with any other references.
-
-Using `unsafe` code to incorrectly circumvent and violate these
-restrictions is undefined behaviour. For example, the following
-creates two aliasing `&mut` pointers, and is invalid.
-
-```
-use std::mem;
-let mut x: u8 = 1;
-
-let ref_1: &mut u8 = &mut x;
-let ref_2: &mut u8 = unsafe { mem::transmute(&mut *ref_1) };
-
-// oops, ref_1 and ref_2 point to the same piece of data (x) and are
-// both usable
-*ref_1 = 10;
-*ref_2 = 20;
-```
-
-## Raw pointers
-
-Rust offers two additional pointer types "raw pointers", written as
-`*const T` and `*mut T`. They're an approximation of C's `const T*` and `T*`
-respectively; indeed, one of their most common uses is for FFI,
-interfacing with external C libraries.
-
-Raw pointers have much fewer guarantees than other pointer types
-offered by the Rust language and libraries. For example, they
-
-- are not guaranteed to point to valid memory and are not even
- guaranteed to be non-null (unlike both `Box` and `&`);
-- do not have any automatic clean-up, unlike `Box`, and so require
- manual resource management;
-- are plain-old-data, that is, they don't move ownership, again unlike
- `Box`, hence the Rust compiler cannot protect against bugs like
- use-after-free;
-- are considered sendable (if their contents is considered sendable),
- so the compiler offers no assistance with ensuring their use is
- thread-safe; for example, one can concurrently access a `*mut int`
- from two threads without synchronization.
-- lack any form of lifetimes, unlike `&`, and so the compiler cannot
- reason about dangling pointers; and
-- have no guarantees about aliasing or mutability other than mutation
- not being allowed directly through a `*const T`.
-
-Fortunately, they come with a redeeming feature: the weaker guarantees
-mean weaker restrictions. The missing restrictions make raw pointers
-appropriate as a building block for implementing things like smart
-pointers and vectors inside libraries. For example, `*` pointers are
-allowed to alias, allowing them to be used to write shared-ownership
-types like reference counted and garbage collected pointers, and even
-thread-safe shared memory types (`Rc` and the `Arc` types are both
-implemented entirely in Rust).
-
-There are two things that you are required to be careful about
-(i.e. require an `unsafe { ... }` block) with raw pointers:
-
-- dereferencing: they can have any value: so possible results include
- a crash, a read of uninitialised memory, a use-after-free, or
- reading data as normal.
-- pointer arithmetic via the `offset` [intrinsic](#intrinsics) (or
- `.offset` method): this intrinsic uses so-called "in-bounds"
- arithmetic, that is, it is only defined behaviour if the result is
- inside (or one-byte-past-the-end) of the object from which the
- original pointer came.
-
-The latter assumption allows the compiler to optimize more
-effectively. As can be seen, actually *creating* a raw pointer is not
-unsafe, and neither is converting to an integer.
-
-### References and raw pointers
-
-At runtime, a raw pointer `*` and a reference pointing to the same
-piece of data have an identical representation. In fact, an `&T`
-reference will implicitly coerce to an `*const T` raw pointer in safe code
-and similarly for the `mut` variants (both coercions can be performed
-explicitly with, respectively, `value as *const T` and `value as *mut T`).
-
-Going the opposite direction, from `*const` to a reference `&`, is not
-safe. A `&T` is always valid, and so, at a minimum, the raw pointer
-`*const T` has to point to a valid instance of type `T`. Furthermore,
-the resulting pointer must satisfy the aliasing and mutability laws of
-references. The compiler assumes these properties are true for any
-references, no matter how they are created, and so any conversion from
-raw pointers is asserting that they hold. The programmer *must*
-guarantee this.
-
-The recommended method for the conversion is
-
-```
-let i: u32 = 1;
-// explicit cast
-let p_imm: *const u32 = &i as *const u32;
-let mut m: u32 = 2;
-// implicit coercion
-let p_mut: *mut u32 = &mut m;
-
-unsafe {
- let ref_imm: &u32 = &*p_imm;
- let ref_mut: &mut u32 = &mut *p_mut;
-}
-```
-
-The `&*x` dereferencing style is preferred to using a `transmute`.
-The latter is far more powerful than necessary, and the more
-restricted operation is harder to use incorrectly; for example, it
-requires that `x` is a pointer (unlike `transmute`).
-
-
-
-## Making the unsafe safe(r)
-
-There are various ways to expose a safe interface around some unsafe
-code:
-
-- store pointers privately (i.e. not in public fields of public
- structs), so that you can see and control all reads and writes to
- the pointer in one place.
-- use `assert!()` a lot: since you can't rely on the protection of the
- compiler & type-system to ensure that your `unsafe` code is correct
- at compile-time, use `assert!()` to verify that it is doing the
- right thing at run-time.
-- implement the `Drop` for resource clean-up via a destructor, and use
- RAII (Resource Acquisition Is Initialization). This reduces the need
- for any manual memory management by users, and automatically ensures
- that clean-up is always run, even when the task panics.
-- ensure that any data stored behind a raw pointer is destroyed at the
- appropriate time.
-
-As an example, we give a reimplementation of owned boxes by wrapping
-`malloc` and `free`. Rust's move semantics and lifetimes mean this
-reimplementation is as safe as the `Box` type.
-
-```
-#![feature(unsafe_destructor)]
-
-extern crate libc;
-use libc::{c_void, size_t, malloc, free};
-use std::mem;
-use std::ptr;
-
-// Define a wrapper around the handle returned by the foreign code.
-// Unique<T> has the same semantics as Box<T>
-pub struct Unique<T> {
- // It contains a single raw, mutable pointer to the object in question.
- ptr: *mut T
-}
-
-// Implement methods for creating and using the values in the box.
-
-// NB: For simplicity and correctness, we require that T has kind Send
-// (owned boxes relax this restriction).
-impl<T: Send> Unique<T> {
- pub fn new(value: T) -> Unique<T> {
- unsafe {
- let ptr = malloc(mem::size_of::<T>() as size_t) as *mut T;
- // we *need* valid pointer.
- assert!(!ptr.is_null());
- // `*ptr` is uninitialized, and `*ptr = value` would
- // attempt to destroy it `overwrite` moves a value into
- // this memory without attempting to drop the original
- // value.
- ptr::write(&mut *ptr, value);
- Unique{ptr: ptr}
- }
- }
-
- // the 'r lifetime results in the same semantics as `&*x` with
- // Box<T>
- pub fn borrow<'r>(&'r self) -> &'r T {
- // By construction, self.ptr is valid
- unsafe { &*self.ptr }
- }
-
- // the 'r lifetime results in the same semantics as `&mut *x` with
- // Box<T>
- pub fn borrow_mut<'r>(&'r mut self) -> &'r mut T {
- unsafe { &mut *self.ptr }
- }
-}
-
-// A key ingredient for safety, we associate a destructor with
-// Unique<T>, making the struct manage the raw pointer: when the
-// struct goes out of scope, it will automatically free the raw pointer.
-//
-// NB: This is an unsafe destructor, because rustc will not normally
-// allow destructors to be associated with parameterized types, due to
-// bad interaction with managed boxes. (With the Send restriction,
-// we don't have this problem.) Note that the `#[unsafe_destructor]`
-// feature gate is required to use unsafe destructors.
-#[unsafe_destructor]
-impl<T: Send> Drop for Unique<T> {
- fn drop(&mut self) {
- unsafe {
- // Copy the object out from the pointer onto the stack,
- // where it is covered by normal Rust destructor semantics
- // and cleans itself up, if necessary
- ptr::read(self.ptr as *const T);
-
- // clean-up our allocation
- free(self.ptr as *mut c_void)
- }
- }
-}
-
-// A comparison between the built-in `Box` and this reimplementation
-fn main() {
- {
- let mut x = box 5i;
- *x = 10;
- } // `x` is freed here
-
- {
- let mut y = Unique::new(5i);
- *y.borrow_mut() = 10;
- } // `y` is freed here
-}
-```
-
-Notably, the only way to construct a `Unique` is via the `new`
-function, and this function ensures that the internal pointer is valid
-and hidden in the private field. The two `borrow` methods are safe
-because the compiler statically guarantees that objects are never used
-before creation or after destruction (unless you use some `unsafe`
-code...).
-
-# Inline assembly
-
-For extremely low-level manipulations and performance reasons, one
-might wish to control the CPU directly. Rust supports using inline
-assembly to do this via the `asm!` macro. The syntax roughly matches
-that of GCC & Clang:
-
-```ignore
-asm!(assembly template
- : output operands
- : input operands
- : clobbers
- : options
- );
-```
-
-Any use of `asm` is feature gated (requires `#![feature(asm)]` on the
-crate to allow) and of course requires an `unsafe` block.
-
-> **Note**: the examples here are given in x86/x86-64 assembly, but
-> all platforms are supported.
-
-## Assembly template
-
-The `assembly template` is the only required parameter and must be a
-literal string (i.e `""`)
-
-```
-#![feature(asm)]
-
-#[cfg(any(target_arch = "x86", target_arch = "x86_64"))]
-fn foo() {
- unsafe {
- asm!("NOP");
- }
-}
-
-// other platforms
-#[cfg(not(any(target_arch = "x86", target_arch = "x86_64")))]
-fn foo() { /* ... */ }
-
-fn main() {
- // ...
- foo();
- // ...
-}
-```
-
-(The `feature(asm)` and `#[cfg]`s are omitted from now on.)
-
-Output operands, input operands, clobbers and options are all optional
-but you must add the right number of `:` if you skip them:
-
-```
-# #![feature(asm)]
-# #[cfg(any(target_arch = "x86", target_arch = "x86_64"))]
-# fn main() { unsafe {
-asm!("xor %eax, %eax"
- :
- :
- : "eax"
- );
-# } }
-```
-
-Whitespace also doesn't matter:
-
-```
-# #![feature(asm)]
-# #[cfg(any(target_arch = "x86", target_arch = "x86_64"))]
-# fn main() { unsafe {
-asm!("xor %eax, %eax" ::: "eax");
-# } }
-```
-
-## Operands
-
-Input and output operands follow the same format: `:
-"constraints1"(expr1), "constraints2"(expr2), ..."`. Output operand
-expressions must be mutable lvalues:
-
-```
-# #![feature(asm)]
-# #[cfg(any(target_arch = "x86", target_arch = "x86_64"))]
-fn add(a: int, b: int) -> int {
- let mut c = 0;
- unsafe {
- asm!("add $2, $0"
- : "=r"(c)
- : "0"(a), "r"(b)
- );
- }
- c
-}
-# #[cfg(not(any(target_arch = "x86", target_arch = "x86_64")))]
-# fn add(a: int, b: int) -> int { a + b }
-
-fn main() {
- assert_eq!(add(3, 14159), 14162)
-}
-```
-
-## Clobbers
-
-Some instructions modify registers which might otherwise have held
-different values so we use the clobbers list to indicate to the
-compiler not to assume any values loaded into those registers will
-stay valid.
-
-```
-# #![feature(asm)]
-# #[cfg(any(target_arch = "x86", target_arch = "x86_64"))]
-# fn main() { unsafe {
-// Put the value 0x200 in eax
-asm!("mov $$0x200, %eax" : /* no outputs */ : /* no inputs */ : "eax");
-# } }
-```
-
-Input and output registers need not be listed since that information
-is already communicated by the given constraints. Otherwise, any other
-registers used either implicitly or explicitly should be listed.
-
-If the assembly changes the condition code register `cc` should be
-specified as one of the clobbers. Similarly, if the assembly modifies
-memory, `memory` should also be specified.
-
-## Options
-
-The last section, `options` is specific to Rust. The format is comma
-separated literal strings (i.e `:"foo", "bar", "baz"`). It's used to
-specify some extra info about the inline assembly:
-
-Current valid options are:
-
-1. **volatile** - specifying this is analogous to `__asm__ __volatile__ (...)` in gcc/clang.
-2. **alignstack** - certain instructions expect the stack to be
- aligned a certain way (i.e SSE) and specifying this indicates to
- the compiler to insert its usual stack alignment code
-3. **intel** - use intel syntax instead of the default AT&T.
-
-# Avoiding the standard library
-
-By default, `std` is linked to every Rust crate. In some contexts,
-this is undesirable, and can be avoided with the `#![no_std]`
-attribute attached to the crate.
-
-```ignore
-// a minimal library
-#![crate_type="lib"]
-#![no_std]
-# // fn main() {} tricked you, rustdoc!
-```
-
-Obviously there's more to life than just libraries: one can use
-`#[no_std]` with an executable, controlling the entry point is
-possible in two ways: the `#[start]` attribute, or overriding the
-default shim for the C `main` function with your own.
-
-The function marked `#[start]` is passed the command line parameters
-in the same format as C:
-
-```
-#![no_std]
-#![feature(lang_items)]
-
-// Pull in the system libc library for what crt0.o likely requires
-extern crate libc;
-
-// Entry point for this program
-#[start]
-fn start(_argc: int, _argv: *const *const u8) -> int {
- 0
-}
-
-// These functions and traits are used by the compiler, but not
-// for a bare-bones hello world. These are normally
-// provided by libstd.
-#[lang = "stack_exhausted"] extern fn stack_exhausted() {}
-#[lang = "eh_personality"] extern fn eh_personality() {}
-#[lang = "panic_fmt"] fn panic_fmt() -> ! { loop {} }
-# // fn main() {} tricked you, rustdoc!
-```
-
-To override the compiler-inserted `main` shim, one has to disable it
-with `#![no_main]` and then create the appropriate symbol with the
-correct ABI and the correct name, which requires overriding the
-compiler's name mangling too:
-
-```ignore
-#![no_std]
-#![no_main]
-#![feature(lang_items)]
-
-extern crate libc;
-
-#[no_mangle] // ensure that this symbol is called `main` in the output
-pub extern fn main(argc: int, argv: *const *const u8) -> int {
- 0
-}
-
-#[lang = "stack_exhausted"] extern fn stack_exhausted() {}
-#[lang = "eh_personality"] extern fn eh_personality() {}
-#[lang = "panic_fmt"] fn panic_fmt() -> ! { loop {} }
-# // fn main() {} tricked you, rustdoc!
-```
-
-
-The compiler currently makes a few assumptions about symbols which are available
-in the executable to call. Normally these functions are provided by the standard
-library, but without it you must define your own.
-
-The first of these three functions, `stack_exhausted`, is invoked whenever stack
-overflow is detected. This function has a number of restrictions about how it
-can be called and what it must do, but if the stack limit register is not being
-maintained then a task always has an "infinite stack" and this function
-shouldn't get triggered.
-
-The second of these three functions, `eh_personality`, is used by the
-failure mechanisms of the compiler. This is often mapped to GCC's
-personality function (see the
-[libstd implementation](std/rt/unwind/index.html) for more
-information), but crates which do not trigger a panic can be assured
-that this function is never called. The final function, `panic_fmt`, is
-also used by the failure mechanisms of the compiler.
-
-## Using libcore
-
-> **Note**: the core library's structure is unstable, and it is recommended to
-> use the standard library instead wherever possible.
-
-With the above techniques, we've got a bare-metal executable running some Rust
-code. There is a good deal of functionality provided by the standard library,
-however, that is necessary to be productive in Rust. If the standard library is
-not sufficient, then [libcore](core/index.html) is designed to be used
-instead.
-
-The core library has very few dependencies and is much more portable than the
-standard library itself. Additionally, the core library has most of the
-necessary functionality for writing idiomatic and effective Rust code.
-
-As an example, here is a program that will calculate the dot product of two
-vectors provided from C, using idiomatic Rust practices.
-
-```
-#![no_std]
-#![feature(globs)]
-#![feature(lang_items)]
-
-# extern crate libc;
-extern crate core;
-
-use core::prelude::*;
-
-use core::mem;
-
-#[no_mangle]
-pub extern fn dot_product(a: *const u32, a_len: u32,
- b: *const u32, b_len: u32) -> u32 {
- use core::raw::Slice;
-
- // Convert the provided arrays into Rust slices.
- // The core::raw module guarantees that the Slice
- // structure has the same memory layout as a &[T]
- // slice.
- //
- // This is an unsafe operation because the compiler
- // cannot tell the pointers are valid.
- let (a_slice, b_slice): (&[u32], &[u32]) = unsafe {
- mem::transmute((
- Slice { data: a, len: a_len as uint },
- Slice { data: b, len: b_len as uint },
- ))
- };
-
- // Iterate over the slices, collecting the result
- let mut ret = 0;
- for (i, j) in a_slice.iter().zip(b_slice.iter()) {
- ret += (*i) * (*j);
- }
- return ret;
-}
-
-#[lang = "panic_fmt"]
-extern fn panic_fmt(args: &core::fmt::Arguments,
- file: &str,
- line: uint) -> ! {
- loop {}
-}
-
-#[lang = "stack_exhausted"] extern fn stack_exhausted() {}
-#[lang = "eh_personality"] extern fn eh_personality() {}
-# #[start] fn start(argc: int, argv: *const *const u8) -> int { 0 }
-# fn main() {}
-```
-
-Note that there is one extra lang item here which differs from the examples
-above, `panic_fmt`. This must be defined by consumers of libcore because the
-core library declares panics, but it does not define it. The `panic_fmt`
-lang item is this crate's definition of panic, and it must be guaranteed to
-never return.
-
-As can be seen in this example, the core library is intended to provide the
-power of Rust in all circumstances, regardless of platform requirements. Further
-libraries, such as liballoc, add functionality to libcore which make other
-platform-specific assumptions, but continue to be more portable than the
-standard library itself.
-
-# Interacting with the compiler internals
-
-> **Note**: this section is specific to the `rustc` compiler; these
-> parts of the language may never be fully specified and so details may
-> differ wildly between implementations (and even versions of `rustc`
-> itself).
->
-> Furthermore, this is just an overview; the best form of
-> documentation for specific instances of these features are their
-> definitions and uses in `std`.
-
-The Rust language currently has two orthogonal mechanisms for allowing
-libraries to interact directly with the compiler and vice versa:
-
-- intrinsics, functions built directly into the compiler providing
- very basic low-level functionality,
-- lang-items, special functions, types and traits in libraries marked
- with specific `#[lang]` attributes
-
-## Intrinsics
-
-> **Note**: intrinsics will forever have an unstable interface, it is
-> recommended to use the stable interfaces of libcore rather than intrinsics
-> directly.
-
-These are imported as if they were FFI functions, with the special
-`rust-intrinsic` ABI. For example, if one was in a freestanding
-context, but wished to be able to `transmute` between types, and
-perform efficient pointer arithmetic, one would import those functions
-via a declaration like
-
-```
-# #![feature(intrinsics)]
-# fn main() {}
-
-extern "rust-intrinsic" {
- fn transmute<T, U>(x: T) -> U;
-
- fn offset<T>(dst: *const T, offset: int) -> *const T;
-}
-```
-
-As with any other FFI functions, these are always `unsafe` to call.
-
-## Lang items
-
-> **Note**: lang items are often provided by crates in the Rust distribution,
-> and lang items themselves have an unstable interface. It is recommended to use
-> officially distributed crates instead of defining your own lang items.
-
-The `rustc` compiler has certain pluggable operations, that is,
-functionality that isn't hard-coded into the language, but is
-implemented in libraries, with a special marker to tell the compiler
-it exists. The marker is the attribute `#[lang="..."]` and there are
-various different values of `...`, i.e. various different "lang
-items".
-
-For example, `Box` pointers require two lang items, one for allocation
-and one for deallocation. A freestanding program that uses the `Box`
-sugar for dynamic allocations via `malloc` and `free`:
-
-```
-#![no_std]
-#![feature(lang_items)]
-
-extern crate libc;
-
-extern {
- fn abort() -> !;
-}
-
-#[lang = "owned_box"]
-pub struct Box<T>(*mut T);
-
-#[lang="exchange_malloc"]
-unsafe fn allocate(size: uint, _align: uint) -> *mut u8 {
- let p = libc::malloc(size as libc::size_t) as *mut u8;
-
- // malloc failed
- if p as uint == 0 {
- abort();
- }
-
- p
-}
-#[lang="exchange_free"]
-unsafe fn deallocate(ptr: *mut u8, _size: uint, _align: uint) {
- libc::free(ptr as *mut libc::c_void)
-}
-
-#[start]
-fn main(argc: int, argv: *const *const u8) -> int {
- let x = box 1i;
-
- 0
-}
-
-#[lang = "stack_exhausted"] extern fn stack_exhausted() {}
-#[lang = "eh_personality"] extern fn eh_personality() {}
-#[lang = "panic_fmt"] fn panic_fmt() -> ! { loop {} }
-```
-
-Note the use of `abort`: the `exchange_malloc` lang item is assumed to
-return a valid pointer, and so needs to do the check internally.
-
-Other features provided by lang items include:
-
-- overloadable operators via traits: the traits corresponding to the
- `==`, `<`, dereferencing (`*`) and `+` (etc.) operators are all
- marked with lang items; those specific four are `eq`, `ord`,
- `deref`, and `add` respectively.
-- stack unwinding and general failure; the `eh_personality`, `fail`
- and `fail_bounds_checks` lang items.
-- the traits in `std::markers` used to indicate types of
- various kinds; lang items `send`, `sync` and `copy`.
-- the marker types and variance indicators found in
- `std::markers`; lang items `covariant_type`,
- `contravariant_lifetime`, `no_sync_bound`, etc.
-
-Lang items are loaded lazily by the compiler; e.g. if one never uses
-`Box` then there is no need to define functions for `exchange_malloc`
-and `exchange_free`. `rustc` will emit an error when an item is needed
-but not found in the current crate or any that it depends on.
+This content has moved into
+[the Rust Programming Language book](book/unsafe.html).