use expr::rewrite_call;
use macros::convert_try_mac;
use rewrite::{Rewrite, RewriteContext};
-use utils::{first_line_width, last_line_extendable, last_line_width, mk_sp, wrap_str};
+use utils::{first_line_width, last_line_extendable, last_line_width, mk_sp,
+ trimmed_last_line_width, wrap_str};
use std::cmp::min;
use std::iter;
let first_child_shape = if extend {
let overhead = last_line_width(&parent_rewrite);
- let offset = parent_rewrite.lines().rev().next().unwrap().trim().len();
+ let offset = trimmed_last_line_width(&parent_rewrite);
match context.config.chain_indent() {
IndentStyle::Visual => parent_shape.offset_left(overhead)?,
IndentStyle::Block => parent_shape.block().offset_left(offset)?,
last_line_width(&parent_rewrite)
} else {
rewrites.iter().fold(0, |a, b| a + b.len()) + parent_rewrite.len()
- };
+ } + suffix_try_num;
let one_line_budget = if rewrites.is_empty() && !context.config.chain_split_single_child() {
shape.width
} else {
let all_in_one_line = !parent_rewrite_contains_newline
&& rewrites.iter().all(|s| !s.contains('\n'))
&& almost_total < one_line_budget;
- let last_shape = if rewrites.is_empty() {
- // We only have a single child.
- first_child_shape
- } else {
- match context.config.chain_indent() {
- IndentStyle::Visual => other_child_shape.sub_width(shape.rhs_overhead(context.config))?,
- IndentStyle::Block => other_child_shape,
- }
+ let last_shape = match context.config.chain_indent() {
+ IndentStyle::Visual => other_child_shape.sub_width(shape.rhs_overhead(context.config))?,
+ IndentStyle::Block => other_child_shape,
};
let last_shape = last_shape.sub_width(suffix_try_num)?;
+
+ // Rewrite the last child. The last child of a chain requires special treatment. We need to
+ // know whether 'overflowing' the last child make a better formatting:
+ //
+ // A chain with overflowing the last child:
+ // ```
+ // parent.child1.child2.last_child(
+ // a,
+ // b,
+ // c,
+ // )
+ // ```
+ //
+ // A chain without overflowing the last child (in vertical layout):
+ // ```
+ // parent
+ // .child1
+ // .child2
+ // .last_child(a, b, c)
+ // ```
+ //
+ // In particular, overflowing is effective when the last child is a method with a multi-lined
+ // block-like argument (e.g. closure):
+ // ```
+ // parent.child1.chlid2.last_child(|a, b, c| {
+ // let x = foo(a, b, c);
+ // let y = bar(a, b, c);
+ //
+ // // ...
+ //
+ // result
+ // })
+ // ```
+
+ // `rewrite_last` rewrites the last child on its own line. We use a closure here instead of
+ // directly calling `rewrite_chain_subexpr()` to avoid exponential blowup.
let rewrite_last = || rewrite_chain_subexpr(last_subexpr, total_span, context, last_shape);
let (last_subexpr_str, fits_single_line) = if all_in_one_line || extend_last_subexr {
+ // First we try to 'overflow' the last child and see if it looks better than using
+ // vertical layout.
parent_shape.offset_left(almost_total).map(|shape| {
if let Some(rw) = rewrite_chain_subexpr(last_subexpr, total_span, context, shape) {
+ // We allow overflowing here only if both of the following conditions match:
+ // 1. The entire chain fits in a single line expect the last child.
+ // 2. `last_chlid_str.lines().count() >= 5`.
let line_count = rw.lines().count();
let fits_single_line = almost_total + first_line_width(&rw) <= one_line_budget;
- if fits_single_line && (line_count >= 5 && fits_single_line || extend_last_subexr) {
+ if fits_single_line && line_count >= 5 {
(Some(rw), true)
} else {
+ // We could not know whether overflowing is better than using vertical layout,
+ // just by looking at the overflowed rewrite. Now we rewrite the last child
+ // on its own line, and compare two rewrites to choose which is better.
match rewrite_last() {
Some(ref new_rw) if !fits_single_line => (Some(new_rw.clone()), false),
Some(ref new_rw) if new_rw.lines().count() >= line_count => {