i would not be at all surprised if the nix kernel (with or without the AC stuff) ends up being the basis for continuing evolution of plan9.
Subject: [9fans] Go tip build fails
FWIW may be it would make more sense to install Plan 9 (9front) then?
+[9fans] Installing Go
+Subject: [9fans] Go testing and resource exhaustion
+[dev] trying to get surf working on Raspberry pi
+I have not good result for bell-labs version.
+[drone-list] gender question
+Subject: [9fans] is lsub web server up?
+Subject: [9fans] werc performance with rc on linux
+Subject: [9fans] p9p on Retina Macs
+Yeah, I forgot to mention that. I'm using plan9port on Mac OS X.
+(#plan9) TimKack → Fish: Got a fossil/fossil: fsSnapshot: corrupted meta data now - I think it came from that I took away the -V (I want to send off snaps to venti)
+Subject: [9fans] Acme real estate on 15" macbook pro?
+Behaviour is clearly broken, but it's not clear exactly what is broken.
+Package Management for Go
+can someone take a look at this bug on p9p?
+i'd really like things to tab complete because I have no idea of the API
+Fast compilation times[8]
+This worked very well under Mavericks.
+Log: Edited wiki page 9pi through web user interface.
+I briefly looked at 9front and 9atom. I thought I would query this group about the two. Is one better maintained than the other? Does one have better hardware support than the other?
+Hi, I'm using golang to code a 9p filesystem on linux.
+In spite of some really great ideas, I think we'd all agree that Plan-9 has no real future.
+I now have 9Front running fine, and, in fact, I am renewing a port of an OO language extension to it.