I replied on golang-nuts.
There is no issue here.
I'm not sure if this distinction is a valid one.
+I'd rather not.
+Oops.
+Not that I have any real definitive answer, but I can hazard a guess...
+That makes sense.
+I don't remember seeing that happen ever before.
+i don't look at build failures at all anymore because they are all false positives.
+Grumble grumble.
+I don't remember the last time I saw a sam-fans message.
+I'll fix it.
+working as intended; please don't file an issue.
+sure
+I would love it if someone would create a well-tested emacs Go module.
+Honestly it sounds like you have not written any Go programs.
+I'm not convinced this needs to be in the standard library.
+I haven't thought about it yet.
+Don't do that.
+Don't overthink this.
+I don't know what you are arguing for or against.
+We understand your point of view.
+Thanks for letting us know.