9fs: remove juke, kfs and snap targets, caching for other and dump

[plan9front.git] / lib / rsc

diff --git a/lib/rsc b/lib/rsc
index 9d843fa861fd4f0b0f2343710c93bfa9ddfbced7..8c944e49f6397cc58e0b342c2ffb001a4330a4c9 100644 (file)
--- a/lib/rsc
+++ b/lib/rsc
@@ -205,3 +205,22 @@ Thank you for writing a 3rd party tool.
 It's true that there are no plans yet, but I think it's also true that we need to start planning.
 Yes, that's confusing.
 Please do not spend time on this.
+Maybe this is true, but I haven't seen it.
+The fundamental design question here is whether the benefit outweighs the complexity being added.
+Enough with the religion. Please.
+It should just work.
+Sorry for not replying earlier. I don't really know.
+Great.
+This seems OK.
+Let's take our time and do it right (whatever that is).
+Really we're just behind on triaging bugs.
+I'll dig the code up and post it somewhere. I never made it truly usable.
+Will follow up off list.
+Wait a second.
+I think it's always been this way.
+I would wait until there's a more established pattern of a problem before introducing additional mechanisms.
+How easily can you write a test?
+We broke the rule, and we shouldn't have. Our bad.
+ML is indeed a fantastic language for writing compilers.
+We can't keep the code running indefinitely.
+Have you filed a bug about this?