Actually that's the way it's supposed to work.
that was me.
if you're going to do something about it, great.
+I think.
+Some extra work is required.
+that's a bigger job than you might think.
+We can fix the code, probably.
+This is misleading.
+it took me just as long to install the windows software as it did to write the plan 9 software.
+All things being equal, maybe I'd like there to be more Plan 9 users.
+Sorry, I don't think there's much we can do.
+The bikeshed has already been painted, and the painter has gone.
+Being stuck using Solaris makes being stuck using Linux look like a birthday party.
+also, plan9front claims to include a working go compiler. what did they do?
+I don't think we'd scale to a thousand nodes very well.
+Buh?
+Feature lists are great, but don't forget that there's always an implementation cost.
+Sorry, no luck.
+Now, now, be fair.
+I wish...
+We tried that.
+Dude, wake up!
+Looks like a bug to me.
+You think Windows runs in polynomial time?
+Also, backups are good.
+if you want something in particular, you could always port it.
+Suppose you subscribe to the Kernighan & Plauger thesis that programs should be clear.
+NOT LGTM
+Even if we'd made a horrible mistake, though, we cannot change it now as that would break the compatibility promise we have made with Go 1.
+Your source is mistaken.
+This sounds like an intriguing and fun way to structure a program.
+Chording works too: or example, copy is hold down mouse button, highlight, type option, type command, let go of mouse button.
+Very nice.
+looks fine.
+Thanks, but I'd prefer not to do this.
+Interesting, thanks.
+Ouch
+Please don't.
+Test?
+sure
+NOT LGTM sorry
+i lost the ability to use rio a few years ago when they moved wireless configuration into the gnome window manager, making it impossible to have rio and a network connection at the same time.
projects / plan9front.git / blobdiff