use rustc_errors::Diagnostic;
use rustc_hir::def_id::{DefId, CRATE_DEF_ID, LOCAL_CRATE};
use rustc_hir::CRATE_HIR_ID;
-use rustc_infer::infer::{InferCtxt, TyCtxtInferExt};
+use rustc_infer::infer::{DefiningAnchor, InferCtxt, TyCtxtInferExt};
use rustc_infer::traits::util;
use rustc_middle::traits::specialization_graph::OverlapMode;
use rustc_middle::ty::fast_reject::{DeepRejectCtxt, TreatParams};
return None;
}
- let infcx = tcx.infer_ctxt().build();
- let selcx = &mut SelectionContext::intercrate(&infcx);
+ let infcx =
+ tcx.infer_ctxt().with_opaque_type_inference(DefiningAnchor::Bubble).intercrate().build();
+ let selcx = &mut SelectionContext::new(&infcx);
let overlaps =
overlap(selcx, skip_leak_check, impl1_def_id, impl2_def_id, overlap_mode).is_some();
if !overlaps {
// In the case where we detect an error, run the check again, but
// this time tracking intercrate ambiguity causes for better
// diagnostics. (These take time and can lead to false errors.)
- let infcx = tcx.infer_ctxt().build();
- let selcx = &mut SelectionContext::intercrate(&infcx);
+ let infcx =
+ tcx.infer_ctxt().with_opaque_type_inference(DefiningAnchor::Bubble).intercrate().build();
+ let selcx = &mut SelectionContext::new(&infcx);
selcx.enable_tracking_intercrate_ambiguity_causes();
Some(overlap(selcx, skip_leak_check, impl1_def_id, impl2_def_id, overlap_mode).unwrap())
}
impl_def_id: DefId,
) -> ty::ImplHeader<'tcx> {
let tcx = selcx.tcx();
- let impl_substs = selcx.infcx().fresh_substs_for_item(DUMMY_SP, impl_def_id);
+ let impl_substs = selcx.infcx.fresh_substs_for_item(DUMMY_SP, impl_def_id);
let header = ty::ImplHeader {
impl_def_id,
impl1_def_id, impl2_def_id, overlap_mode
);
- selcx.infcx().probe_maybe_skip_leak_check(skip_leak_check.is_yes(), |snapshot| {
+ selcx.infcx.probe_maybe_skip_leak_check(skip_leak_check.is_yes(), |snapshot| {
overlap_within_probe(selcx, impl1_def_id, impl2_def_id, overlap_mode, snapshot)
})
}
overlap_mode: OverlapMode,
snapshot: &CombinedSnapshot<'tcx>,
) -> Option<OverlapResult<'tcx>> {
- let infcx = selcx.infcx();
+ let infcx = selcx.infcx;
if overlap_mode.use_negative_impl() {
if negative_impl(infcx.tcx, impl1_def_id, impl2_def_id)
debug!("overlap: intercrate_ambiguity_causes={:#?}", intercrate_ambiguity_causes);
let involves_placeholder =
- matches!(selcx.infcx().region_constraints_added_in_snapshot(snapshot), Some(true));
+ matches!(selcx.infcx.region_constraints_added_in_snapshot(snapshot), Some(true));
- let impl_header = selcx.infcx().resolve_vars_if_possible(impl1_header);
+ let impl_header = selcx.infcx.resolve_vars_if_possible(impl1_header);
Some(OverlapResult { impl_header, intercrate_ambiguity_causes, involves_placeholder })
}
// Do `a` and `b` unify? If not, no overlap.
debug!("equate_impl_headers(impl1_header={:?}, impl2_header={:?}", impl1_header, impl2_header);
selcx
- .infcx()
+ .infcx
.at(&ObligationCause::dummy(), ty::ParamEnv::empty())
.eq_impl_headers(impl1_header, impl2_header)
.map(|infer_ok| infer_ok.obligations)
"implicit_negative(impl1_header={:?}, impl2_header={:?}, obligations={:?})",
impl1_header, impl2_header, obligations
);
- let infcx = selcx.infcx();
+ let infcx = selcx.infcx;
let opt_failing_obligation = impl1_header
.predicates
.iter()