-use rustc::lint::*;
-use rustc::{declare_lint, lint_array};
-use syntax::ast::*;
-use syntax::codemap::Span;
-use syntax::symbol::LocalInternedString;
use crate::utils::span_lint;
+use rustc_ast::ast::{Item, ItemKind, UseTree, UseTreeKind};
+use rustc_lint::{EarlyContext, EarlyLintPass};
+use rustc_session::{declare_lint_pass, declare_tool_lint};
+use rustc_span::source_map::Span;
+use rustc_span::symbol::Ident;
-/// **What it does:** Checks for imports that remove "unsafe" from an item's
-/// name.
-///
-/// **Why is this bad?** Renaming makes it less clear which traits and
-/// structures are unsafe.
-///
-/// **Known problems:** None.
-///
-/// **Example:**
-/// ```rust,ignore
-/// use std::cell::{UnsafeCell as TotallySafeCell};
-///
-/// extern crate crossbeam;
-/// use crossbeam::{spawn_unsafe as spawn};
-/// ```
declare_clippy_lint! {
+ /// **What it does:** Checks for imports that remove "unsafe" from an item's
+ /// name.
+ ///
+ /// **Why is this bad?** Renaming makes it less clear which traits and
+ /// structures are unsafe.
+ ///
+ /// **Known problems:** None.
+ ///
+ /// **Example:**
+ /// ```rust,ignore
+ /// use std::cell::{UnsafeCell as TotallySafeCell};
+ ///
+ /// extern crate crossbeam;
+ /// use crossbeam::{spawn_unsafe as spawn};
+ /// ```
pub UNSAFE_REMOVED_FROM_NAME,
style,
"`unsafe` removed from API names on import"
}
-pub struct UnsafeNameRemoval;
-
-impl LintPass for UnsafeNameRemoval {
- fn get_lints(&self) -> LintArray {
- lint_array!(UNSAFE_REMOVED_FROM_NAME)
- }
-}
+declare_lint_pass!(UnsafeNameRemoval => [UNSAFE_REMOVED_FROM_NAME]);
impl EarlyLintPass for UnsafeNameRemoval {
fn check_item(&mut self, cx: &EarlyContext<'_>, item: &Item) {
- if let ItemKind::Use(ref use_tree) = item.node {
+ if let ItemKind::Use(ref use_tree) = item.kind {
check_use_tree(use_tree, cx, item.span);
}
}
.expect("use paths cannot be empty")
.ident;
unsafe_to_safe_check(old_name, new_name, cx, span);
- }
- UseTreeKind::Simple(None, ..) |
- UseTreeKind::Glob => {},
+ },
+ UseTreeKind::Simple(None, ..) | UseTreeKind::Glob => {},
UseTreeKind::Nested(ref nested_use_tree) => {
for &(ref use_tree, _) in nested_use_tree {
check_use_tree(use_tree, cx, span);
}
- }
+ },
}
}
cx,
UNSAFE_REMOVED_FROM_NAME,
span,
- &format!("removed \"unsafe\" from the name of `{}` in use as `{}`", old_str, new_str),
+ &format!(
+ "removed `unsafe` from the name of `{}` in use as `{}`",
+ old_str, new_str
+ ),
);
}
}
-fn contains_unsafe(name: &LocalInternedString) -> bool {
+#[must_use]
+fn contains_unsafe(name: &str) -> bool {
name.contains("Unsafe") || name.contains("unsafe")
}