use std::ptr;
+use clippy_utils::diagnostics::span_lint_and_then;
+use clippy_utils::in_constant;
+use if_chain::if_chain;
use rustc_hir::def::{DefKind, Res};
-use rustc_hir::{Expr, ExprKind, ImplItem, ImplItemKind, Item, ItemKind, Node, TraitItem, TraitItemKind, UnOp};
+use rustc_hir::def_id::DefId;
+use rustc_hir::{
+ BodyId, Expr, ExprKind, HirId, Impl, ImplItem, ImplItemKind, Item, ItemKind, Node, TraitItem, TraitItemKind, UnOp,
+};
use rustc_infer::traits::specialization_graph;
use rustc_lint::{LateContext, LateLintPass, Lint};
+use rustc_middle::mir::interpret::{ConstValue, ErrorHandled};
use rustc_middle::ty::adjustment::Adjust;
-use rustc_middle::ty::{AssocKind, Ty};
+use rustc_middle::ty::{self, AssocKind, Const, Ty};
use rustc_session::{declare_lint_pass, declare_tool_lint};
use rustc_span::{InnerSpan, Span, DUMMY_SP};
use rustc_typeck::hir_ty_to_ty;
-use crate::utils::{in_constant, qpath_res, span_lint_and_then};
-use if_chain::if_chain;
-
// FIXME: this is a correctness problem but there's no suitable
// warn-by-default category.
declare_clippy_lint! {
- /// **What it does:** Checks for declaration of `const` items which is interior
+ /// ### What it does
+ /// Checks for declaration of `const` items which is interior
/// mutable (e.g., contains a `Cell`, `Mutex`, `AtomicXxxx`, etc.).
///
- /// **Why is this bad?** Consts are copied everywhere they are referenced, i.e.,
+ /// ### Why is this bad?
+ /// Consts are copied everywhere they are referenced, i.e.,
/// every time you refer to the const a fresh instance of the `Cell` or `Mutex`
/// or `AtomicXxxx` will be created, which defeats the whole purpose of using
/// these types in the first place.
/// The `const` should better be replaced by a `static` item if a global
/// variable is wanted, or replaced by a `const fn` if a constructor is wanted.
///
- /// **Known problems:** A "non-constant" const item is a legacy way to supply an
+ /// ### Known problems
+ /// A "non-constant" const item is a legacy way to supply an
/// initialized value to downstream `static` items (e.g., the
/// `std::sync::ONCE_INIT` constant). In this case the use of `const` is legit,
/// and this lint should be suppressed.
///
- /// When an enum has variants with interior mutability, use of its non interior mutable
- /// variants can generate false positives. See issue
- /// [#3962](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/3962)
+ /// Even though the lint avoids triggering on a constant whose type has enums that have variants
+ /// with interior mutability, and its value uses non interior mutable variants (see
+ /// [#3962](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/3962) and
+ /// [#3825](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/3825) for examples);
+ /// it complains about associated constants without default values only based on its types;
+ /// which might not be preferable.
+ /// There're other enums plus associated constants cases that the lint cannot handle.
///
/// Types that have underlying or potential interior mutability trigger the lint whether
/// the interior mutable field is used or not. See issues
/// [#5812](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/5812) and
- /// [#3825](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/3825)
///
- /// **Example:**
+ /// ### Example
/// ```rust
/// use std::sync::atomic::{AtomicUsize, Ordering::SeqCst};
///
// FIXME: this is a correctness problem but there's no suitable
// warn-by-default category.
declare_clippy_lint! {
- /// **What it does:** Checks if `const` items which is interior mutable (e.g.,
+ /// ### What it does
+ /// Checks if `const` items which is interior mutable (e.g.,
/// contains a `Cell`, `Mutex`, `AtomicXxxx`, etc.) has been borrowed directly.
///
- /// **Why is this bad?** Consts are copied everywhere they are referenced, i.e.,
+ /// ### Why is this bad?
+ /// Consts are copied everywhere they are referenced, i.e.,
/// every time you refer to the const a fresh instance of the `Cell` or `Mutex`
/// or `AtomicXxxx` will be created, which defeats the whole purpose of using
/// these types in the first place.
///
/// The `const` value should be stored inside a `static` item.
///
- /// **Known problems:** When an enum has variants with interior mutability, use of its non
+ /// ### Known problems
+ /// When an enum has variants with interior mutability, use of its non
/// interior mutable variants can generate false positives. See issue
/// [#3962](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/3962)
///
/// [#5812](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/5812) and
/// [#3825](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/3825)
///
- /// **Example:**
+ /// ### Example
/// ```rust
/// use std::sync::atomic::{AtomicUsize, Ordering::SeqCst};
/// const CONST_ATOM: AtomicUsize = AtomicUsize::new(12);
"referencing `const` with interior mutability"
}
+fn is_unfrozen<'tcx>(cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, ty: Ty<'tcx>) -> bool {
+ // Ignore types whose layout is unknown since `is_freeze` reports every generic types as `!Freeze`,
+ // making it indistinguishable from `UnsafeCell`. i.e. it isn't a tool to prove a type is
+ // 'unfrozen'. However, this code causes a false negative in which
+ // a type contains a layout-unknown type, but also a unsafe cell like `const CELL: Cell<T>`.
+ // Yet, it's better than `ty.has_type_flags(TypeFlags::HAS_TY_PARAM | TypeFlags::HAS_PROJECTION)`
+ // since it works when a pointer indirection involves (`Cell<*const T>`).
+ // Making up a `ParamEnv` where every generic params and assoc types are `Freeze`is another option;
+ // but I'm not sure whether it's a decent way, if possible.
+ cx.tcx.layout_of(cx.param_env.and(ty)).is_ok() && !ty.is_freeze(cx.tcx.at(DUMMY_SP), cx.param_env)
+}
+
+fn is_value_unfrozen_raw<'tcx>(
+ cx: &LateContext<'tcx>,
+ result: Result<ConstValue<'tcx>, ErrorHandled>,
+ ty: Ty<'tcx>,
+) -> bool {
+ fn inner<'tcx>(cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, val: &'tcx Const<'tcx>) -> bool {
+ match val.ty.kind() {
+ // the fact that we have to dig into every structs to search enums
+ // leads us to the point checking `UnsafeCell` directly is the only option.
+ ty::Adt(ty_def, ..) if Some(ty_def.did) == cx.tcx.lang_items().unsafe_cell_type() => true,
+ ty::Array(..) | ty::Adt(..) | ty::Tuple(..) => {
+ let val = cx.tcx.destructure_const(cx.param_env.and(val));
+ val.fields.iter().any(|field| inner(cx, field))
+ },
+ _ => false,
+ }
+ }
+
+ result.map_or_else(
+ |err| {
+ // Consider `TooGeneric` cases as being unfrozen.
+ // This causes a false positive where an assoc const whose type is unfrozen
+ // have a value that is a frozen variant with a generic param (an example is
+ // `declare_interior_mutable_const::enums::BothOfCellAndGeneric::GENERIC_VARIANT`).
+ // However, it prevents a number of false negatives that is, I think, important:
+ // 1. assoc consts in trait defs referring to consts of themselves
+ // (an example is `declare_interior_mutable_const::traits::ConcreteTypes::ANOTHER_ATOMIC`).
+ // 2. a path expr referring to assoc consts whose type is doesn't have
+ // any frozen variants in trait defs (i.e. without substitute for `Self`).
+ // (e.g. borrowing `borrow_interior_mutable_const::trait::ConcreteTypes::ATOMIC`)
+ // 3. similar to the false positive above;
+ // but the value is an unfrozen variant, or the type has no enums. (An example is
+ // `declare_interior_mutable_const::enums::BothOfCellAndGeneric::UNFROZEN_VARIANT`
+ // and `declare_interior_mutable_const::enums::BothOfCellAndGeneric::NO_ENUM`).
+ // One might be able to prevent these FNs correctly, and replace this with `false`;
+ // e.g. implementing `has_frozen_variant` described above, and not running this function
+ // when the type doesn't have any frozen variants would be the 'correct' way for the 2nd
+ // case (that actually removes another suboptimal behavior (I won't say 'false positive') where,
+ // similar to 2., but with the a frozen variant) (e.g. borrowing
+ // `borrow_interior_mutable_const::enums::AssocConsts::TO_BE_FROZEN_VARIANT`).
+ // I chose this way because unfrozen enums as assoc consts are rare (or, hopefully, none).
+ err == ErrorHandled::TooGeneric
+ },
+ |val| inner(cx, Const::from_value(cx.tcx, val, ty)),
+ )
+}
+
+fn is_value_unfrozen_poly<'tcx>(cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, body_id: BodyId, ty: Ty<'tcx>) -> bool {
+ let result = cx.tcx.const_eval_poly(body_id.hir_id.owner.to_def_id());
+ is_value_unfrozen_raw(cx, result, ty)
+}
+
+fn is_value_unfrozen_expr<'tcx>(cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, hir_id: HirId, def_id: DefId, ty: Ty<'tcx>) -> bool {
+ let substs = cx.typeck_results().node_substs(hir_id);
+
+ let result = cx.tcx.const_eval_resolve(
+ cx.param_env,
+ ty::Unevaluated {
+ def: ty::WithOptConstParam::unknown(def_id),
+ substs,
+ promoted: None,
+ },
+ None,
+ );
+ is_value_unfrozen_raw(cx, result, ty)
+}
+
#[derive(Copy, Clone)]
enum Source {
Item { item: Span },
}
}
-fn verify_ty_bound<'tcx>(cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, ty: Ty<'tcx>, source: Source) {
- // Ignore types whose layout is unknown since `is_freeze` reports every generic types as `!Freeze`,
- // making it indistinguishable from `UnsafeCell`. i.e. it isn't a tool to prove a type is
- // 'unfrozen'. However, this code causes a false negative in which
- // a type contains a layout-unknown type, but also a unsafe cell like `const CELL: Cell<T>`.
- // Yet, it's better than `ty.has_type_flags(TypeFlags::HAS_TY_PARAM | TypeFlags::HAS_PROJECTION)`
- // since it works when a pointer indirection involves (`Cell<*const T>`).
- // Making up a `ParamEnv` where every generic params and assoc types are `Freeze`is another option;
- // but I'm not sure whether it's a decent way, if possible.
- if cx.tcx.layout_of(cx.param_env.and(ty)).is_err() || ty.is_freeze(cx.tcx.at(DUMMY_SP), cx.param_env) {
- return;
- }
-
+fn lint(cx: &LateContext<'_>, source: Source) {
let (lint, msg, span) = source.lint();
span_lint_and_then(cx, lint, span, msg, |diag| {
if span.from_expansion() {
impl<'tcx> LateLintPass<'tcx> for NonCopyConst {
fn check_item(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, it: &'tcx Item<'_>) {
- if let ItemKind::Const(hir_ty, ..) = &it.kind {
+ if let ItemKind::Const(hir_ty, body_id) = it.kind {
let ty = hir_ty_to_ty(cx.tcx, hir_ty);
- verify_ty_bound(cx, ty, Source::Item { item: it.span });
+
+ if is_unfrozen(cx, ty) && is_value_unfrozen_poly(cx, body_id, ty) {
+ lint(cx, Source::Item { item: it.span });
+ }
}
}
fn check_trait_item(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, trait_item: &'tcx TraitItem<'_>) {
- if let TraitItemKind::Const(hir_ty, ..) = &trait_item.kind {
+ if let TraitItemKind::Const(hir_ty, body_id_opt) = &trait_item.kind {
let ty = hir_ty_to_ty(cx.tcx, hir_ty);
+
// Normalize assoc types because ones originated from generic params
// bounded other traits could have their bound.
let normalized = cx.tcx.normalize_erasing_regions(cx.param_env, ty);
- verify_ty_bound(cx, normalized, Source::Assoc { item: trait_item.span });
+ if is_unfrozen(cx, normalized)
+ // When there's no default value, lint it only according to its type;
+ // in other words, lint consts whose value *could* be unfrozen, not definitely is.
+ // This feels inconsistent with how the lint treats generic types,
+ // which avoids linting types which potentially become unfrozen.
+ // One could check whether a unfrozen type have a *frozen variant*
+ // (like `body_id_opt.map_or_else(|| !has_frozen_variant(...), ...)`),
+ // and do the same as the case of generic types at impl items.
+ // Note that it isn't sufficient to check if it has an enum
+ // since all of that enum's variants can be unfrozen:
+ // i.e. having an enum doesn't necessary mean a type has a frozen variant.
+ // And, implementing it isn't a trivial task; it'll probably end up
+ // re-implementing the trait predicate evaluation specific to `Freeze`.
+ && body_id_opt.map_or(true, |body_id| is_value_unfrozen_poly(cx, body_id, normalized))
+ {
+ lint(cx, Source::Assoc { item: trait_item.span });
+ }
}
}
fn check_impl_item(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, impl_item: &'tcx ImplItem<'_>) {
- if let ImplItemKind::Const(hir_ty, ..) = &impl_item.kind {
- let item_hir_id = cx.tcx.hir().get_parent_node(impl_item.hir_id);
+ if let ImplItemKind::Const(hir_ty, body_id) = &impl_item.kind {
+ let item_hir_id = cx.tcx.hir().get_parent_node(impl_item.hir_id());
let item = cx.tcx.hir().expect_item(item_hir_id);
match &item.kind {
- ItemKind::Impl {
+ ItemKind::Impl(Impl {
of_trait: Some(of_trait_ref),
..
- } => {
+ }) => {
if_chain! {
// Lint a trait impl item only when the definition is a generic type,
// assuming a assoc const is not meant to be a interior mutable type.
),
))
.is_err();
+ // If there were a function like `has_frozen_variant` described above,
+ // we should use here as a frozen variant is a potential to be frozen
+ // similar to unknown layouts.
+ // e.g. `layout_of(...).is_err() || has_frozen_variant(...);`
+ let ty = hir_ty_to_ty(cx.tcx, hir_ty);
+ let normalized = cx.tcx.normalize_erasing_regions(cx.param_env, ty);
+ if is_unfrozen(cx, normalized);
+ if is_value_unfrozen_poly(cx, *body_id, normalized);
then {
- let ty = hir_ty_to_ty(cx.tcx, hir_ty);
- let normalized = cx.tcx.normalize_erasing_regions(cx.param_env, ty);
- verify_ty_bound(
- cx,
- normalized,
- Source::Assoc {
- item: impl_item.span,
+ lint(
+ cx,
+ Source::Assoc {
+ item: impl_item.span,
},
);
}
}
},
- ItemKind::Impl { of_trait: None, .. } => {
+ ItemKind::Impl(Impl { of_trait: None, .. }) => {
let ty = hir_ty_to_ty(cx.tcx, hir_ty);
// Normalize assoc types originated from generic params.
let normalized = cx.tcx.normalize_erasing_regions(cx.param_env, ty);
- verify_ty_bound(cx, normalized, Source::Assoc { item: impl_item.span });
+
+ if is_unfrozen(cx, ty) && is_value_unfrozen_poly(cx, *body_id, normalized) {
+ lint(cx, Source::Assoc { item: impl_item.span });
+ }
},
_ => (),
}
}
// Make sure it is a const item.
- match qpath_res(cx, qpath, expr.hir_id) {
- Res::Def(DefKind::Const | DefKind::AssocConst, _) => {},
+ let item_def_id = match cx.qpath_res(qpath, expr.hir_id) {
+ Res::Def(DefKind::Const | DefKind::AssocConst, did) => did,
_ => return,
};
needs_check_adjustment = false;
break;
},
- ExprKind::Unary(UnOp::UnDeref, _) => {
+ ExprKind::Unary(UnOp::Deref, _) => {
// `*e` => desugared to `*Deref::deref(&e)`,
// meaning `e` must be referenced.
// no need to go further up since a method call is involved now.
cx.typeck_results().expr_ty(dereferenced_expr)
};
- verify_ty_bound(cx, ty, Source::Expr { expr: expr.span });
+ if is_unfrozen(cx, ty) && is_value_unfrozen_expr(cx, expr.hir_id, item_def_id, ty) {
+ lint(cx, Source::Expr { expr: expr.span });
+ }
}
}
}
projects / rust.git / blobdiff