Refactors with peel_blocks

[rust.git] / clippy_lints / src / assertions_on_constants.rs

diff --git a/clippy_lints/src/assertions_on_constants.rs b/clippy_lints/src/assertions_on_constants.rs
index 5235b2642d18c3236d1ba10629f5dec4d12a0fad..b7f414742f1566bd69731f71ce323c6364c7b947 100644 (file)
--- a/clippy_lints/src/assertions_on_constants.rs
+++ b/clippy_lints/src/assertions_on_constants.rs
@@ -1,27 +1,32 @@
 use clippy_utils::consts::{constant, Constant};
 use clippy_utils::diagnostics::span_lint_and_help;
+use clippy_utils::higher;
 use clippy_utils::source::snippet_opt;
-use clippy_utils::{is_direct_expn_of, is_expn_of, match_panic_call};
+use clippy_utils::{is_direct_expn_of, is_expn_of, match_panic_call, peel_blocks};
 use if_chain::if_chain;
 use rustc_hir::{Expr, ExprKind, UnOp};
 use rustc_lint::{LateContext, LateLintPass};
 use rustc_session::{declare_lint_pass, declare_tool_lint};
 
 declare_clippy_lint! {
-    /// **What it does:** Checks for `assert!(true)` and `assert!(false)` calls.
+    /// ### What it does
+    /// Checks for `assert!(true)` and `assert!(false)` calls.
     ///
-    /// **Why is this bad?** Will be optimized out by the compiler or should probably be replaced by a
+    /// ### Why is this bad?
+    /// Will be optimized out by the compiler or should probably be replaced by a
     /// `panic!()` or `unreachable!()`
     ///
-    /// **Known problems:** None
+    /// ### Known problems
+    /// None
     ///
-    /// **Example:**
+    /// ### Example
     /// ```rust,ignore
     /// assert!(false)
     /// assert!(true)
     /// const B: bool = false;
     /// assert!(B)
     /// ```
+    #[clippy::version = "1.34.0"]
     pub ASSERTIONS_ON_CONSTANTS,
     style,
     "`assert!(true)` / `assert!(false)` will be optimized out by the compiler, and should probably be replaced by a `panic!()` or `unreachable!()`"
@@ -113,19 +118,11 @@ enum AssertKind {
 /// where `message` is any expression and `c` is a constant bool.
 fn match_assert_with_message<'tcx>(cx: &LateContext<'tcx>, expr: &'tcx Expr<'_>) -> Option<AssertKind> {
     if_chain! {
-        if let ExprKind::If(cond, then, _) = expr.kind;
+        if let Some(higher::If { cond, then, .. }) = higher::If::hir(expr);
         if let ExprKind::Unary(UnOp::Not, expr) = cond.kind;
         // bind the first argument of the `assert!` macro
         if let Some((Constant::Bool(is_true), _)) = constant(cx, cx.typeck_results(), expr);
-        // block
-        if let ExprKind::Block(block, _) = then.kind;
-        if block.stmts.is_empty();
-        if let Some(block_expr) = &block.expr;
-        // inner block is optional. unwrap it if it exists, or use the expression as is otherwise.
-        if let Some(begin_panic_call) = match block_expr.kind {
-            ExprKind::Block(inner_block, _) => &inner_block.expr,
-            _ => &block.expr,
-        };
+        let begin_panic_call = peel_blocks(then);
         // function call
         if let Some(arg) = match_panic_call(cx, begin_panic_call);
         // bind the second argument of the `assert!` macro if it exists