request.
If you want to request that a specific person reviews your pull request,
-you can add an `r?` to the message. For example, [Steve][steveklabnik] usually reviews
+you can add an `r?` to the pull request description. For example, [Steve][steveklabnik] usually reviews
documentation changes. So if you were to make a documentation change, add
r? @steveklabnik
-to the end of the message, and @rust-highfive will assign [@steveklabnik][steveklabnik] instead
-of a random person. This is entirely optional.
+to the end of the pull request description, and [@rust-highfive][rust-highfive] will assign
+[@steveklabnik][steveklabnik] instead of a random person. This is entirely optional.
After someone has reviewed your pull request, they will leave an annotation
on the pull request with an `r+`. It will look something like this:
to fix the issue.
* The dark blue **final-comment-period** label marks bugs that are using the
- RFC signoff functionality of [rfcbot][rfcbot] and are currently in the final
+ RFC signoff functionality of [rfcbot] and are currently in the final
comment period.
* Red, **I**-prefixed labels indicate the **importance** of the issue. The
label.
* The gray **proposed-final-comment-period** label marks bugs that are using
- the RFC signoff functionality of [rfcbot][rfcbot] and are currently awaiting
+ the RFC signoff functionality of [rfcbot] and are currently awaiting
signoff of all team members in order to enter the final comment period.
* Pink, **regression**-prefixed labels track regressions from stable to the