error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:34:17 | LL | let _ = boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap(); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&boxed_slice[1]` | note: lint level defined here --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:3:9 | LL | #![deny(clippy::get_unwrap)] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:35:17 | LL | let _ = some_slice.get(0).unwrap(); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_slice[0]` error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:36:17 | LL | let _ = some_vec.get(0).unwrap(); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_vec[0]` error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a VecDeque. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:37:17 | LL | let _ = some_vecdeque.get(0).unwrap(); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_vecdeque[0]` error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a HashMap. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:38:17 | LL | let _ = some_hashmap.get(&1).unwrap(); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_hashmap[&1]` error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a BTreeMap. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:39:17 | LL | let _ = some_btreemap.get(&1).unwrap(); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_btreemap[&1]` error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:42:21 | LL | let _: u8 = *boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap(); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `boxed_slice[1]` error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:47:9 | LL | *boxed_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1; | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `boxed_slice[0]` error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:48:9 | LL | *some_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1; | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_slice[0]` error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:49:9 | LL | *some_vec.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1; | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vec[0]` error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a VecDeque. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:50:9 | LL | *some_vecdeque.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1; | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vecdeque[0]` error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:59:17 | LL | let _ = some_vec.get(0..1).unwrap().to_vec(); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vec[0..1]` error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:60:17 | LL | let _ = some_vec.get_mut(0..1).unwrap().to_vec(); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vec[0..1]` error: aborting due to 13 previous errors