1 error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
2 --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:34:17
4 LL | let _ = boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap();
5 | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&boxed_slice[1]`
7 note: the lint level is defined here
8 --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:3:9
10 LL | #![deny(clippy::get_unwrap)]
13 error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
14 --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:35:17
16 LL | let _ = some_slice.get(0).unwrap();
17 | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_slice[0]`
19 error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
20 --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:36:17
22 LL | let _ = some_vec.get(0).unwrap();
23 | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_vec[0]`
25 error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a VecDeque. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
26 --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:37:17
28 LL | let _ = some_vecdeque.get(0).unwrap();
29 | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_vecdeque[0]`
31 error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a HashMap. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
32 --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:38:17
34 LL | let _ = some_hashmap.get(&1).unwrap();
35 | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_hashmap[&1]`
37 error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a BTreeMap. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
38 --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:39:17
40 LL | let _ = some_btreemap.get(&1).unwrap();
41 | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_btreemap[&1]`
43 error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
44 --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:42:21
46 LL | let _: u8 = *boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap();
47 | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `boxed_slice[1]`
49 error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
50 --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:47:9
52 LL | *boxed_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
53 | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `boxed_slice[0]`
55 error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
56 --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:48:9
58 LL | *some_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
59 | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_slice[0]`
61 error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
62 --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:49:9
64 LL | *some_vec.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
65 | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vec[0]`
67 error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a VecDeque. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
68 --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:50:9
70 LL | *some_vecdeque.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
71 | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vecdeque[0]`
73 error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
74 --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:59:17
76 LL | let _ = some_vec.get(0..1).unwrap().to_vec();
77 | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vec[0..1]`
79 error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
80 --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:60:17
82 LL | let _ = some_vec.get_mut(0..1).unwrap().to_vec();
83 | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vec[0..1]`
85 error: aborting due to 13 previous errors