1 use crate::rustc::lint::{LateContext, LateLintPass, LintArray, LintPass};
2 use crate::rustc::{declare_tool_lint, lint_array};
4 use crate::rustc::hir::*;
5 use crate::utils::{is_adjusted, iter_input_pats, snippet_opt, span_lint_and_then};
6 use crate::rustc_errors::Applicability;
8 #[allow(missing_copy_implementations)]
12 /// **What it does:** Checks for closures which just call another function where
13 /// the function can be called directly. `unsafe` functions or calls where types
14 /// get adjusted are ignored.
16 /// **Why is this bad?** Needlessly creating a closure adds code for no benefit
17 /// and gives the optimizer more work.
19 /// **Known problems:** If creating the closure inside the closure has a side-
20 /// effect then moving the closure creation out will change when that side-
22 /// See https://github.com/rust-lang-nursery/rust-clippy/issues/1439 for more
27 /// xs.map(|x| foo(x))
29 /// where `foo(_)` is a plain function that takes the exact argument type of
31 declare_clippy_lint! {
32 pub REDUNDANT_CLOSURE,
34 "redundant closures, i.e. `|a| foo(a)` (which can be written as just `foo`)"
37 impl LintPass for EtaPass {
38 fn get_lints(&self) -> LintArray {
39 lint_array!(REDUNDANT_CLOSURE)
43 impl<'a, 'tcx> LateLintPass<'a, 'tcx> for EtaPass {
44 fn check_expr(&mut self, cx: &LateContext<'a, 'tcx>, expr: &'tcx Expr) {
46 ExprKind::Call(_, ref args) | ExprKind::MethodCall(_, _, ref args) => for arg in args {
47 check_closure(cx, arg)
54 fn check_closure(cx: &LateContext<'_, '_>, expr: &Expr) {
55 if let ExprKind::Closure(_, ref decl, eid, _, _) = expr.node {
56 let body = cx.tcx.hir.body(eid);
58 if let ExprKind::Call(ref caller, ref args) = ex.node {
59 if args.len() != decl.inputs.len() {
60 // Not the same number of arguments, there
61 // is no way the closure is the same as the function
64 if is_adjusted(cx, ex) || args.iter().any(|arg| is_adjusted(cx, arg)) {
65 // Are the expression or the arguments type-adjusted? Then we need the closure
68 let fn_ty = cx.tables.expr_ty(caller);
70 // Is it an unsafe function? They don't implement the closure traits
71 ty::FnDef(..) | ty::FnPtr(_) => {
72 let sig = fn_ty.fn_sig(cx.tcx);
73 if sig.skip_binder().unsafety == Unsafety::Unsafe || sig.skip_binder().output().sty == ty::Never {
79 for (a1, a2) in iter_input_pats(decl, body).zip(args) {
80 if let PatKind::Binding(_, _, ident, _) = a1.pat.node {
81 // XXXManishearth Should I be checking the binding mode here?
82 if let ExprKind::Path(QPath::Resolved(None, ref p)) = a2.node {
83 if p.segments.len() != 1 {
84 // If it's a proper path, it can't be a local variable
87 if p.segments[0].ident.name != ident.name {
88 // The two idents should be the same
98 span_lint_and_then(cx, REDUNDANT_CLOSURE, expr.span, "redundant closure found", |db| {
99 if let Some(snippet) = snippet_opt(cx, caller.span) {
100 db.span_suggestion_with_applicability(
102 "remove closure as shown",
104 Applicability::MachineApplicable,